Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Pagan
Jason Arday, Con Man

Jason Arday, Con Man

Last updated on: September 15, 2026 at 9:55 am by Tom Swiss

0 Comments

Jason Arday, Con Man 2026-09-15T09:55:55-04:00 Tom Swiss

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In the system of masculine archetypes we’ve previously discussed, the Con Man is the shadow of the Trickster.

Of the various shadow archetypes we’ve discussed, I have always had a bit of a soft spot for the Con Man. Like the Trickster, the Con Man is free from social conventions and unbound by the usual rules. When the Con Man is merely tricking the elderly out of their savings, or embezzling from a small company before disappearing to a country without an extradition treaty and leaving owner-operators and employees in the lurch, his behavior serves no higher end.

But sometimes the Con Man’s mark is a person or institution of Authority. In such a case, his behavior undermines that authority, and thus even if he is not consciously working with the Sacred Trickster, he may unknowingly serve the Trickster’s ends. (But then, don’t we all?)

The suicide of Jason Arday is a very sad thing. The degree to which he may have been consciously engaged in Con Man behavior, and to what degree he was suffering from a pathological compulsion to lie — some variant of Factitious disorder (“Munchausen syndrome”) or Narcissistic personality disorder — will be endlessly debated. His fraud robbed taxpayers and students of their due, blocked more worthy candidates from the jobs he took, and arguably gave false hope to the parents of severely disabled kids. He did not deserve to die, but what he did was bad.

But it also serves to demonstrate that the Emperor of Elite Academic Respectability is not clothed in raiment too fine for the average Joe to perceive, but is in truth stark naked. And the Trickster always loves a good Naked Emperor moment.

If you haven’t been following the Arday story: in 2023, the University of Cambridge proudly crowed that this “renowned sociologist” would become the youngest black person ever appointed to a professorship there. (Noting, with the language that was almost mandatory during “peak woke”, that “Cambridge has achieved some notable gains in attempting to diversify the landscape, but there is so much more to be done.”)

Photo via University of Cambridge. Fair use.

Already the Cambridge announcement contained details that were hard to credit: Arday supposedly “overcame illiteracy in his late teens”, “was unable to speak until he was 11” and “therapists and career advisers predicted he would spend his adult life in assisted living and require lifelong support”.

And he claimed not just this extraordinary academic transformation, but extraordinary athletic feats — in 2010, he claimed to have run 30 marathons in 35 days and to have raised over £5m with such charity work. A contemporaneous story in The Guardian notes:

It’s an unlikely story, [Arday] concedes, one that has made headlines and changed his life irrevocably. But he believes he was always going to do something great. “I knew I was destined to do something,” he says with a smile. “But I didn’t know it’d be this, admittedly.”

Extraordinary claims, certainly. Was there extraordinary evidence to support them? Well, no, as it turns out.

By last fall, Times Higher Education was working on a story about evidence that Arday had plagiarized parts of his Ph.D. thesis and several journal articles. He had even, it was claimed, put plagiarized text into material he claimed to be quoting from subjects he had supposedly interviewed.

But Arday called in the heavy legal guns of Carter-Ruck to use the threat of action under the UK’s absurd defamation laws to get the magazine to cancel the story.

Arday’s fraud was thus able to fester and grow; it strikes me that it may have been better for everyone, Arday included, if it had been revealed sooner. Instead, the marks got taken further and further in.

The story got weirder and weirder, with Arday making such claims of harassment as being attacked by a knife-wielding attacker — an attacker who somehow did not show up on video surveillance. He claimed that someone left a pig’s head in a cardboard box outside his parents’ home and that he reported it to police, who investigated and found a local butcher who sold a whole hog on the morning of the incident; the police denied any such investigation.

The Social Justice Bezzle

The Arday saga reveals an important part of the MO of the Con Man: tell the mark what they want to hear. Flatter them. (See also: the AI boom, where sycophantic LLMs make users feel like geniuses.) The mark then has strong incentive to believe then Con Man is insightful, honest, and accurate in his appraisals. In order to protect their own ego the mark will defend the con man when the truth starts to come out.

In this case, Arday let elite academia believe that it is a force for social progress — empowering the powerless, fighting “white supremacy”, and bringing justice to the world. Academics are the good guys, opposing the sorts of baddies who wave knives at and send pig’s heads to innocent black men.

As Arday said after his appointment to Cambridge, “We’re talking about thousand-year-old white establishments. And anytime you’re a person of colour that penetrates those legacy spaces, it can be difficult for some people to digest or manage. Our mission, in some respects, is very simple. It goes back to what we’ve always tried to do, which is to democratise education information and redistribute resources as far and wide as possible to those most in need.”

Who wouldn’t want to be part of that glorious struggle?

So it’s not surprising — intensely problematic, but not surprising — that when the truth came to light, Cambridge called the claims a “vile smear campaign to undermine his credibility,” and an open letter in support of the fraudster gained such supporters as the UK’s Green party leader, Zack Polanski. On-line discussion still has many supporters of Arday, many of whom seem to be more interested in the virtue signaling they can do by defending his legacy than in the facts of the case.

By coincidence, in the same month as the Arday denouement, another black academic published an insightful and revealing piece about the state of academia and “wokeness”. Tyler Austin Harper’s “Why I Quit the Tenure Track”, in the September 2026 issue of The Atlantic, describes his former employer Bates College as “…a place where current and future elites paid—or were paid—for the privilege of cosplaying as radicals, victims, or both.”

[I]t is no coincidence that wokeness blossomed at prestigious American colleges at the very moment when those schools were facing rising discontent over student debt and tuition costs. For the academic aristocracy, touting fealty to Black Lives Matter, #MeToo, trans rights, and other progressive movements served as a convenient distraction from the intractable economic and social issues that the colleges themselves were perpetuating. This allowed higher education to reclaim the moral high ground after Occupy Wall Street and the 2016 Bernie Sanders campaign—to say nothing of the anti-elite fury that gave rise to Donald Trump—had kicked mud all over academia’s ivy-twined walls. Even better, embracing social-justice rhetoric and adopting schemes to boost faculty diversity were cheap. Cheaper, anyway, than lowering tuition or hiring more tenure-track professors.

Academia’s self-image as a force for justice and progress left it vulnerable to a fraudster who would re-enforce that image. We should take the lesson of that example to heart.

Previous Post

August 5, 2026

Starwood 2026 -- This Is Not A Review

Next Post

October 2, 2026 Chess Grifters, Chinese Rooms, and AI

What Hebrew word, meaning "vanity" or "meaningless," is frequently used in Ecclesiastes?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Torah Hevel Shalom Ruach