Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Pagan
Politics and Religion
Two Wrongs Don’t Make A Right

Two Wrongs Don’t Make A Right

Last updated on: December 7, 2023 at 12:10 am by Tom Swiss

0 Comments

Two Wrongs Don’t Make A Right 2023-12-07T00:10:34-04:00 Tom Swiss

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Mom always said — and quite likely your mom said it too — that two wrongs don’t make a right.

These days, such a thought is considered dangerous, liable to get you accused of “bothsidesing” or “whataboutism”. Whether the two sides in question are the Republicians and Democrats, or Russia and Ukrine, or Israel and Hamas, you are expected to take a side, ignore its sins, and call for the destruction of the other side.

But it is a deep pathology to be unable to say that both sides in a dispute — whether it is a dysfunctional personal relationship, a political rivalry, or a war — are engaged in wrongdoing.

Even if you believe that one of the parties was the original instigator or aggressor, it is vital to be able to see how a long-running cycle of attacks and reprisals degrades the moral character of both sides.

As Buddhaghosa wrote, striking out in anger is like picking up a burning ember or excrement to throw at the enemy: you only burn yourself or make yourself stink.

So imagine the state of two disputants who have been through many cycles of this, burning themselves and covering themselves in shit.

Let us imagine that we walk into a room to find two men fighting, and not in accordance with Marquess of Queensberry rules. Let’s call them Smith and Jones.

Mair, Paul Hector: De arte athletica II. Public domain image via Wikimedia Commons

As we walk in, Jones trips Smith and kicks him in the ribs while he’s down. In response, when Smith regains his feet he kicks Jones in the groin. In response, Jones seizes Smith’s ear in his teeth and rips it. In response, Smith gouges Jones’s eye.

Because we walked into the room at a point where Jones was attacking Smith with a “dirty” tactic, our sympathies might lie with Smith as a victim of Jones’s attack. But we didn’t see that just a second before that, Smith threw a bottle at Jones’s head. But before that Jones reached for a knife. But before that…and so on.

At this point in a cycle of escalation, it hardly matters who started it.

And a cycle like this can continue until one participant is dead and the other is hideously maimed. So it is in the interests of both sides to stop it.

But in the heat of battle, of anger over the “unfair” tactics used by the other and with a perception (be it true or false) that the other side is an existential threat and cannot be negotiated with, it’s difficult for the combatants to realize this.

The best hope is for a neutral third party, trusted by both sides, to intervene and break things up, interrupting the escalation cycle. But in a highly partisan environment, where remaining neutral is considered a sin, it may be that no such third party may be found.

If no one from the outside is going to save our disputants from each other and from their own darkest impulses, deescalation can only begin with them. And the party who is in the better position to initiate that, is the stronger of the combatants.

In the Israel-Hamas conflict, it’s obvious that Israel is the stronger party — thanks in part to the unconditional backing of the United States. Pointing this out, and suggesting that resolving the conflict has to start with the Israeli/US side, is not a justification of the terror tactics employed by either side. It is a recognition of fundamental realities.

And this is an observation that also applies to our far less consequential personal conflicts. When we are dealing with an annoying coworker, or a problematic family member (especially around the holidays), being willing and able to de-escalate the conflict — to not return a wrong for a wrong — is a sign of strength, not of weakness.

Politics and Religion

Ethics, Virtue, and Right Living

Previous Post

September 28, 2023

The Flautist In The Woods

Next Post

December 20, 2023 Symbolic Magic And The Dead In Arlington

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"taking on the role of the mailman in several games of postal chessOK, I gotta ..."

lowtechcyclist

Chess Grifters, Chinese Rooms, and AI

"Welcome back! Looking forward to new posts from you. I like the idea of an ..."

Laurie

Partnering Up in 2026

"What's the attendance at Starwood these days?"

Penny Moulder

For Best Magical Resilts, Set Your ..."

"1. It wasn't a metaphor. To suggest otherwise is blatant dishonesty; and seems to be ..."

Encrypted Dude

Deconstructing the Bears Vs. Men Memeplex

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2017 52 Makeup 2020 52 Makeup Always Roaming With A Hungry Heart Art Because I Could Not Stop For Death Caught On Video COVID-19 Culture Discordianism Ethics, Virtue, and Right Living History Magic(k), Ritual, and Mysticism My Blogging Life and Times Philosophy Podcast Poetry Random Wednesdays Religion & Politics Seasonal Musings Techno-Pagan Theology Uncategorized Warrior Path Zen

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 March 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 September 2024 August 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 October 2022 September 2022 June 2022 April 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was Boaz's wife?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Sarah Orpah Ruth Naomi