Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Pagan
Our Problem With Immigration: Inconsistency

Our Problem With Immigration: Inconsistency

Last updated on: July 4, 2018 at 2:36 pm by Tom Swiss

Our Problem With Immigration: Inconsistency 2018-07-04T14:36:26-04:00 Tom Swiss

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

At some point in your life, you may have had a job like this: you showed up your first day, and your supervisor showed you around and told you a bunch of rules and procedures. To get anything out of the supply cabinet, you need to file a written request with Alice; requests for vacation time need to go to Bob; for petty cash for small purchases, see Charlie.

But in the first few weeks, you learned how things really worked. No one ever actually puts requests to Alice in writing beforehand, they just take what they need from the cabinet and then leave her a note after. Bob delegates vacation requests to his assistant Dave, so you’ll get better results going directly to him. And you can never get ahold of Charlie, he’s always in some meeting or another, but if you make your purchase and take your receipt to Eve she will reimburse you.

The practical, de facto rules were different than the official, de jure ones.

And then…a new manager came along, and said “This flouting of proper procedure is unacceptable! These rules are in place for a reason and from now on they will be followed to the letter. Anyone breaking them will be terminated!”

And the thing is, that new manager isn’t wrong. The rules were in place and everyone knew them, and even an anarchist like me has to agree that there need to be some rules in the workplace. (Anarchists just want them set by mutual agreement of the workers, rather than by managers working on behalf of capitalists.)

And the situation may be bad for the company. It might be especially hard on some employees — like poor Fred in accounting who’s always having to clean up the paperwork over these violations and is getting sort of peeved about it. Indeed a lot of folks think Fred is the one who ratted them out to management, and are upset at him about it.

But that new manager isn’t right, either, because the way that the de facto rules evolved shows that the de jure rules were not working.

This sort of conflict between de jure and de facto rules sets the stage for backlash if the de facto rules don’t work either, if they just shift the problem around — or if someone who values rules for their own sake comes to be in charge.

Which takes us to immigration.

Image by Nick Youngson, CC BY-SA 3.0, via creative-commons-images.com

There are a complex set of rules for legal immigration to the United States. And they don’t work very well. Over the past few decades businesses ranging from agriculture to construction to software development have routinely skirted them — sometimes out of practical necessity, sometimes out of greed — and a set of de facto rules evolved.

Many people came here in violation of the de jure rules but in compliance with the de facto ones. They were no more unethical to do so than our hypothetical office workers were in taking their reimbursement requests to Eve. Many of them built lives here in compliance with those de facto rules.

And many American citizens benefited. The supply of labor in fields like agriculture and construction expanded, the cost fell, and so we got cheaper food and buildings. (And software.) And most of the illegal workers got more opportunity than they had in their home countries.

(I am declining to jump on the euphemism treadmill and refer to these folks as “undocumented”, because that does not mean the same thing. One can be in a country legally and not be documented, though bureaucratic error or loss of documents; one can have documents and yet be there illegally by violating some condition of immigration.)

But many American citizens did not benefit. Immigrants in general, and particularly those here illegally, lack bargaining power, and are often willing to settle for a lower standard of living; so they are exploitable in the capitalist race to the bottom. As the supply of labor expands, wages for workers at the bottom of the pile are dragged down.

As George J. Borjas, professor of economics and social policy at the Harvard Kennedy School, explains, “[I]mmigration redistributes wealth from those who compete with immigrants to those who use immigrants — from the employee to the employer.”

And in a partisan environment where Democrats long ago made a deliberate decision to abandon white working-class voters in favor of a coalition of white college-educated professionals and feminists along with African Americans and, later, Latino Americans, pressure built for an anti-immigrant backlash.

Pressure that a narcissistic sociopathic conman and reality TV star was only too happy to use to his advantage.

But those upset about the harmful effects immigration policy have had on them and their communities, are no more unethical than our hypothetical accountant Fred who was getting the short end of the stick in the office situation.

Can we see that both those who came here illegally but in compliance with the de facto rules, and those upset about how the de facto rules have failed them, have legitimate grievances with the power structure?

So what is the answer?

In our office scenario, if the new bosses are to be effective they cannot mindless enforce the old failed de jure rules; they must create a better set. And they cannot punish those who obeyed the old facto rules. They must at least offer a period of amnesty.

But those people whose behavior caused Fred to bear an extra burden owe him something. At the very least, an apology; better, some sort of restitution. He can’t be made the target of recrimination for complaining to the new bosses, not if the company is going to succeed.

Better laws going forward. Amnesty for those who have come here illegally and built a life. Restitution to those who have been harmed by illegal immigration. Mutual forgiveness and basic respect for people trying to make a decent life for themselves, and an understanding the the obstacle is neither immigrants wanting to cheat nor native workers who don’t want to share, but the exploitation of the owning classes.

The odds, my friends, are not good.

Religion & Politics

immigration

Previous Post

June 21, 2018

Incarceration Separates Families

Next Post

July 3, 2018 Throwing The Flag In The Trash

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 2017 52 Makeup 2020 52 Makeup Always Roaming With A Hungry Heart Art Because I Could Not Stop For Death Caught On Video COVID-19 Culture Discordianism Ethics, Virtue, and Right Living History Magic(k), Ritual, and Mysticism My Blogging Life and Times Philosophy Podcast Poetry Random Wednesdays Religion & Politics Seasonal Musings Techno-Pagan Theology Uncategorized Warrior Path Zen

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 March 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 September 2024 August 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 October 2022 September 2022 June 2022 April 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did fire from heaven consume to prove Elijah's God was real?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Sacrifice on Mount Carmel A chariot A golden calf The temple