Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

The Toolshed

Christians Should Stop Ripping Each Other Apart Over Politics

Last updated on: November 11, 2016 at 1:15 pm   by Timothy Willard

Christians Should Stop Ripping Each Other Apart Over Politics 2016-11-11T13:15:00-04:00 Timothy Willard

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I believe the Christian witness in the public square should emanate a transcendent beauty. Beauty in rhetoric, our speech, our writing, our interaction, our online presence, demands deference, not impudence.

We all of us desire a culture governed by virtue rather than vice. But we, in our public commentary of others, should be careful we do not remove culpability. You and I cannot forget the ripples our tweets, posts, and finger pointing make. We must decide if we value our political views more than our Christian witness.

Which way will we choose?

Hear the Cackle?

Have you ever heard a cackle of birds high up in the tree tops? Crows, an unlikely songbird, will often gang-up on an owl in order to annoy it so much that it will move on, away from their neighboring nests. Though owls make excellent rodent reducers, a benefit for humans, they like to feast on the babies of songbirds.

Owls will invade a crows nest, take their young, and eat them. In this way, the owl can abide as a constant pestilence to the treetop songbirds. You can see, therefore, why it’s completely understandable for the owl and the songbird to hold court, each contemptuously berating the other for their vile existence.

The Owl and the Nightingale

Thus is the context for the medieval poem The Owl and the Nightingale. The poem is the “earliest example in English of a popular literary form known as a verse contest.”

What is a verse contest? It is represented in the poem as the narrator overhears a comical debate between an owl and a nightingale about who’s song is more beautiful. The poem is written in Middle English, but you can find worthy translations on the web, or just buy this.

The Nightingale does not like the moralistic and grave Owl. The Owl, who listens to the Plaintiff with puffed chest and supreme arrogance, suggests the two settle the matter as is in harmony with their nature: by force. But the Nightingale does not fall for it, knowing the hawkish features of the Owl would rip it to shreds.

The Owl’s solution is met with more sophistry from the Nightingale, who, along with the Owl, begins to exchange demeaning quips and name-calling. In efforts to prove their points, the fowl reference the human world, touching on issues of marital infidelity, human infallibility, free will, love, and sin. The debate careens into a chaotic harangue, spurred on by the cackling avian spectators.

Here’s one exchange, to whet your whistle. The Nightingale says:

Grotesque thing,’ she said, ‘fly away! I feel bad at the sight of you. Certainly I often have to stop singing because of your foul appearance. My heart sinks, and my tongue falters, when you are close to me. I’d rather spit than sing about your awful guggling.’

The owl waited until it was evening; she couldn’t hold back any longer, because she was so angry that she could hardly breathe, and finally she spoke:

‘How does my song seem to you now? Do you think that I can’t sing just because I can’t twitter? You often insult me and say things to upset and embarrass me. If I held you in my talons—if only I could!–and you were off your branch, you’d sing a very different tune!’

Fortunately, the Wren suggests they employ the services of a mediator lest the debate spiral into violence. So, they fly off to Poresham to inquire with Master Nicholas, the recommended mediator.

We Are All Dirty Birds

I’ve surveyed some scholarship on this poem, and it’s fascinating. Delightfully, both C.S. Lewis and Owen Barfield’s names appeared in several discussions. Lewis, in fact, quoted the poem directly in a letter dated July 4, 1955 to Alastair Fowler.

Fun facts aside, the “moral of the story,” as it were, is not universally agreed upon, though most will acquiesce to the notion that the poem serves as comical commentary on the contentious nature of human beings. 

Interesting, this word “contentious.” When someone is contentious they are usually causing a heated argument. It has Latin and French origins, which we might translate striven: to struggle of fight vigorously against. Of course we can see “strife” there as well: anger or bitter disagreement over a fundamental issue.

I work from my front porch often. My front yard is basically a wood. The Pileated Woodpeckers, Finch, Bluebirds, Cardinals, Hummingbirds, Hawks, and Owls are all present–and a few I don’t recognize. The Owls often stir a cackle. I watch from the porch, the cacophony of flight and feathers, as the cackling debate ensues.

And I see the same cackling taking place on social media and blogs and news feeds.  

After I read this poem I was quick to point out the demise of popular rhetoric, be it the public square or the religious circle. How my heart swelled with the pride of the pointing finger. But how quickly the words of François Fénelon stung me:

“One is very imperfect, when one is so impatient with the imperfections of others.”

Our political times threaten to rip us apart. But, what should be our response and posture as Christians?

We can either heckle the Owl, rip the Nightingale to shreds, or seek another path–another Way. Which will it be?

Uncategorized

Christianity

friendship

nightingale

owls

Politics

rhetoric

Previous Post



November 4, 2016

Christians Should Consider a Political Posture of Silence

Next Post



November 17, 2016 Walk in Wisdom: Life's Secret Sauce


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Beauty Uncategorized World Religions

Select a Month March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 April 2021 March 2021 August 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "I am not ashamed of the gospel"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Paul Peter James John

Related posts from The Toolshed

Evangelical

Global Religion: The Future of Christianity

The Toolshed

Evangelical

Brave New Transhumanism World

The Toolshed

Evangelical

Christians Should Consider a Political Posture of Silence

The Toolshed

Evangelical

Why Politics of Despair Require Unfashionable Faith

The Toolshed

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube