{"id":1070,"date":"2024-04-03T02:46:33","date_gmt":"2024-04-03T06:46:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/theprodigalempire\/?p=1070"},"modified":"2024-04-02T13:46:53","modified_gmt":"2024-04-02T17:46:53","slug":"is-there-a-god-after-deconstruction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/theprodigalempire\/2024\/04\/is-there-a-god-after-deconstruction\/","title":{"rendered":"Is There a God After Deconstruction?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<\/head>
God After Deconstruction. Cover provided by Tom Oord<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/p>
Deconstruction has become a buzzword in American Christianity. This single word can be a beacon of light or the boogeyman under the bed. American Conservative Christianity have demonized the movement, most notably in recent months with a book by Alisa Childers and Tim Barnett<\/a>. Those who criticize the idea of deconstruction favor more conservative and traditional Christian expression in America.<\/p>\n
However, this traditional American expression of Christianity is the exact thing that people are deconstructing. In Oord and Fuller\u2019s book,\u00a0God After Deconstruction,\u00a0<\/em>they note that people are calling into question and doubting ideas about God, the Bible, and Christianity that were once considered immovable. They\u2019re careful to note that it is different from Derrida\u2019s philosophical deconstruction, although I think the fluidity of meaning is actually a great example of what Derrida was arguing for.<\/p>\n
In\u00a0God After Deconstruction,\u00a0<\/em>Oord and Fuller have looked over formal and anecdotal evidence for the reason as to why Christians are leaving their old religion. The rise of those who do not identify with any organized religion \u2013 the \u2018Nones\u2019 \u2013 shows that something is changing. From their research, they invite the reader to explore nine common reasons why people leave the faith while offering their solution \u2013 Open and Relational Theology.<\/p>\n