{"id":213,"date":"2024-02-12T17:20:51","date_gmt":"2024-02-12T23:20:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/thepostsecularwest\/?p=213"},"modified":"2024-02-12T17:20:51","modified_gmt":"2024-02-12T23:20:51","slug":"make-harvard-religious-again","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/thepostsecularwest\/2024\/02\/make-harvard-religious-again\/","title":{"rendered":"Make Harvard Religious Again"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<\/head>
Commentators often bemoan the attention that\u2019s paid to Harvard in our cultural discourse.<\/span><\/p>\n
Harvard, <\/span>it\u2019s<\/span><\/a> sometimes<\/span><\/a> said<\/span><\/a>, educates a tiny fraction of American students and its significance is drastically overstated.<\/span><\/p>\n
Surely, this line of argument runs, we should be paying more attention to the places that educate the vast majority of students: non-selective colleges and universities, most of them public, whose policies help determine the shape of the American citizenry and workforce far more than Harvard\u2019s ever could.<\/span><\/p>\n
The rejoinder, of course, is that what happens at Harvard has a tendency of trickling down to the rest of American academia. Love it or hate it (and I think most Americans probably tend to hate Harvard as a symbol of an out-of-touch elite but would also be pretty excited if a family member got to go there), Harvard matters.<\/span><\/p>\n
My undergraduate alma mater, the University of Chicago, is certainly less iconic, although its campus is more beautiful and its commitment to intellectual inquiry more pure.<\/span><\/p>\n
Chicago\u2019s president, Paul Alivisatos, was not invited to testify before Congress about antisemitism like Claudine Gay of Harvard and her peers from MIT and Penn. Not coincidentally, unlike his peers from Harvard and Penn, he is still in office.<\/span><\/p>\n