A Truly Awful Story

Last updated on: June 29, 2017 at 4:59 pm by John C Holbert

A Truly Awful Story 2017-06-29T16:59:49-05:00 John C Holbert

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Benyamin_Reich,_Akedah ( Lectionary for July 2, 2017)

One of the very first sermons I published for all to see used this text as its inspiration (see my first book, Preaching Old Testament, 1988). I had preached that sermon several times in various ecclesiastical settings and had without fail received very positive responses from many of the listeners. It is without doubt an extremely dramatic tale, climaxing with that terrifying knife suspended over the throat of the helpless Isaac, stopped in the nick of time by the divine angel who announces that now YHWH knows that Abraham really does “fear God” since he has “not withheld your son, your only son, from me” (Gen. 22:12).

I vividly remember the time I preached this as a story sermon, that is merely telling it without comment, following the course the fabulously written account establishes. The location was a small town in south Texas. During the sermon itself, all the lights in the church went out and the sanctuary was plunged into darkness! Talk about dramatic! I did not use notes, so in many ways the unexpected gloom was more than perfect to create an ambiance of dread and spine-tingling expectation. I assure you that I did not plan the outage, but I was quite pleased that it had happened. However, some members of the congregation were somehow uncomfortable with the lack of light, so I watched–while continuing to preach and trying not to laugh—as two of the ushers crept back to a closet, extracted from that space a wedding candelabra, proceeded to light the thing with a rather loud lighter, and tried to move back toward the altar with the now- blazing light source, assuming that their bringing of the light to the front was less distracting than their clumsy footfalls on the tiled aisle! One parishioner after the service said to me, “I wanted so badly to trip them, but I was afraid that our church would burn down!”

In the darkness of that sanctuary, when Abraham raises his fateful knife, clearly ready to murder his son, the tension and horror were palpable. Employing all my limited stage skills, I had the congregation, as they say, “in the palm of my hand,” if that does not sound too grandiose.

But to what end? Though the sermon tried to portray what I think the text was doing, I began after that to question the use of this text at all for preaching. Its dangers now seemed to me palpable. The point of the text appears to be that Abraham, the towering patriarch of Israel, is tested by YHWH to discover whether or not he is worthy of the task for which he has been called, namely to be the founder of God’s uniquely chosen people. After all, up to now in the cycle of Abraham’s story, his actions have been far less than stellar. He has lied about Sarah, the matriarch of Israel twice; he has laughed in the face of YHWH’s promise for a great progeny; he has twice risked that promise by, first, sending his supposed only heir into the wilderness to die, and, second, sending that heir again to die at the request of the jealous Sarah. In neither case did he ask God to act differently; he simply acted mutely in two attempts to murder Ishmael.

In Gen. 22, it has been said that this is Abraham’s third attempt to kill a promised heir, but since this time the heir is Isaac, the child of laughter, he is quite directly and forcefully stopped by YHWH in the very act. Shalom Spiegel’s wonderful 1950 collection of rabbinic commentary on this scene, The Last Trial, details the deep engagement that the sages had, and continue to have, with this story. In many of the comments Spiegel catalogues, the rabbis are desperately concerned with what happened to Isaac after this traumatic event. They recognized immediately that Abraham left the mountain alone (Gen. 22:19!), and their rich imaginations wondered about the abandoned son, left on Moriah to ponder his father’s absurd and monstrous attempt to kill him. And their wondering led to my own. Is this story not redolent of child abuse? Might it also lead one to accuse YHWH of divine child abuse? What sort of God is it who denies a child to a vastly aged couple, then grants them the miracle of a son, and then demands that the father murder that very son? The intent of the story may be to highlight the extraordinary faith of Abraham, but the dark means by which the story presents that intent has become for me too dangerous to use in our modern days of violence within families, especially spousal and child abuse. How can I commend to my congregations a story of faith that suggests that child murder will demonstrate that faith most conclusively?

In short, I no longer use this text for preaching, despite its familiarity, and despite its long connection to the New Testament’s basic story of Jesus’s death as a supposed part of God’s plan for salvation, a notion I find frankly reprehensible itself. Kierkegaard had an memorable phrase he employed in an attempt to describe what was going in Gen. 22. It may be found in his anguished volume Fearand Trembling. The story, said the Danish philosopher, is an example of “the teleological suspension of the absolute.” If I understand the phrase, I suppose he means, “all bets are off.” What you thought you knew about God, what you have up to now learned about God, must be thrown out the window in the face of God’s quite absurd demand of Abraham to murder the child of the promise. Faith, then, he says, can be nothing less than a great leap across the void that inevitably separates what we think we know about God and what God actually is.

If the odd Dane be right, then I admit I want no part of such a God. Any God who would ask me to kill my son as some sort of test of my faith is not God but some twisted and evil demon. This text plainly horrifies me, and I wish to Go 800px-John_R.Gunn(Size_reduced) d it were not in the Bible at all. Preach it if you must, but hedge it round with all manner of caveats and apologies to blunt its foul force. Better yet, do not preach it at all.

(Images from Wikimedia Commons)

Uncategorized

Previous Post

June 23, 2017

The Pain of Prophecy: A Reflection on Jeremiah 20:7-18

Next Post

June 30, 2017 Dueling Prophets on the Fourth of July: Jeremiah 28

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz