Theatrical Theology? – Reflections on the Drama of Doctrine

Last updated on: February 14, 2012 at 8:51 am by Kurt Willems

Theatrical Theology? – Reflections on the Drama of Doctrine 2012-02-13T22:04:27-08:00 Kurt Willems

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

*The following is a guest post from Lawrence Garcia

A robust treatment of doctrine—what spirited understanding discovers at the end of its examination of the apostolic witness of the Christ event—is not enjoyed by many congregations of our time. Either it is wrongly conceived as something that “divides,” or in this age of over specialization, it is totally relinquished into the hands of an elite few, namely, those western academics who bear all the credentials qualifying them to handle such sacred elements. However, there is a drastic consequence for this doctrinal void that characterizes many pulpits: a culturally saturated church that fails to live and proclaim the truth as it is revealed in Jesus Christ. Fortunately, Kevin J. Vanhoozer’s The Drama of Doctrine: A Canonical Linguistic Approach to Christian Theology functions as a much-needed vaccine to this anti-doctrinal contagion currently plaguing the church, Vanhoozer writes:

This book sets forth new metaphors for theology (dramaturgy), Scripture (the script), theological understanding (performance), the church (the company), and the pastor (director).It argues that doctrine, far from being unrelated to life, serves the church by directing its members in the project of wise living, to the glory of God. It sets out to convince ministers and lay people alike not to dismiss doctrine as irrelevant, and to encourage theologians not to neglect the needs of the church. It aims to make the pastoral lamb lie down with the theological lion.

This dramatic metaphor for theology reminds us that theology is not reducible to mere cognitive-propositions (systematic approaches have often been guilty of this) that fall under an either/or rubric of “true and false,” a theory-laden framework that, as Vanhoozer rightly points out, runs roughshod over genre, silences the polyphonic “authorship” of Scripture, and proof-texts in order to fit Scripture into one monological scheme. Taking its cue from the cultural-linguistic theory—the “form of the church’s life and language that gives doctrines their substance and meaning”—Vanhoozer develops what he calls a “canonical-linguistic approach” which unlike its cousin sets theological meaning and truth within the Scriptural canon and not ecclesial culture. In sum, Scripture and doctrine are the church’s canonical script by which it is cast into a role within the wider Trinitarian Theo-drama of redemption where it is called to render a performance that is faithful between the two great “speech-acts” of redemption—the crucifixion/resurrection and the Parousia. Vanhoozer states:

Theology’s task is to equip disciples to speak and act in ways that correspond to the Gospel in particular contexts. Not Just any word or action will do. Not all words and acts are appropriate to the subject matter; not all words and acts achieve theo-dramatic “fit.” The drama of evangelical theology pertains to knowing how to interpret—which is to say, perform—the gospel in concrete situations. Doctrine’s role in the drama is to enable the church to build wisdom’s house: a pattern of speech and action that fits with creation and redemption alike to the glory of God.

Drama, this flexible metaphor for what we do with theology and doctrine, creates enough breathing room for the truthful assertions Scripture makes, but places them within a wider historical theater where God, his Christ, and Spirit are the star actors in a cosmic drama to which the [c]atholic church—the various interpretive communities that have existed throughout time and space since Pentecost—are called to render fitting performances for their specific role. Scripture thus functions like “stage directions for the church’s performance of the Gospel.” Scripture’s authority thus rests ultimately in the divine playwright—God himself—who employs his Spirit to direct the church’s evangelistic performance of the canonical script; the theologian functioning as a dramaturge—“the person responsible for helping the director [pastor] to make sense of the script both for the players and for the audience.”

Eventually, as actors in this theo-drama we will need to prepare to play our role for our particular cultural situation, and an uncreative rehearsal of previous performances will not suffice. First, to render fitting performances we will need to avoid hypocrisy, mere external renditions of our part; instead we must “become the role we play.” Second, we will need to realize our identities as “created persons recreated in Christ—[as] the high and holy calling of the actor/disciple, and the goal of spiritual formation.” Third and finally, developing a “disciple’s diet,” a doctrinally informed way of life that gives way to saintly character. Of course, all this in relation to the climactic speech-act of atonement, both substitutionary and victorious, whereby the one creator God enters into covenant and communion with humanity.

In a church-culture bereft of “thick” doctrinal readings of Scripture, Vanhoozer’s “The Drama of Doctrine” is a much needed theatrical-boost to our reasons to live out a doctrinally soaked vocation in a postmodern world which has lost its way. Vanhoozer’s dramatic approach to theology will aid in helping to mend the chasm between the church’s theory and practice. I cannot possibly recommend this book enough.

———————————————————————————————————————————————

Lawrence is the Senior Teaching-Pastor of Academia Church in Goodyear, Arizona. He is a pastor devoted to the educational growth of his congregants, and the raising up of a new generation of disciples, who will think, tell, and live out the Christian story. Lawrence is currently attending Liberty University.

the drama of doctrine

vanhoozer

Previous Post

February 14, 2012

Consumerism Destroys Calling: Reflections on Student Ministry from "Consuming Youth"

Next Post

February 14, 2012 A video for Valentine's Day - God is Love!

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category (Series) All Out War-Spiritual Warfare (Series) Church Plant Journal (Series) Dear Reader... (Series) Earthquakes...Signs of the Times? (Series) Entering the... Conversation (Series) Evangelical Culture Myths (Series) Everything is Meaningless [Pete Enns] (Series) Evolving Evangelicalism (Series) Hell Yes. Hell No! Who Cares? (Series) Hidden Worldviews (Series) If Evolution is Right, what about Adam? (Series) in less than 300 words (Series) Jesus and Nationalism (Series) Liberating Women for Ministry? (Series) Life-Changing Books (Series) Markers of Church Plant Movement (Series) Nonviolence 101 (Series) Philemon - Reconciliation (Series) Quote to Ponder (Series) Red Letter Dialogues (Series) Resource of the Week (SERIES) Revelation Sermons (Series) Share Something Sundays (Series) Simplicity in the Burbs: $2 a day (Series) The Binding of God [Open Theism] (Series) The Creed: Anabaptist Reflections (Series) Values for Church Leadership (Series) Video to Ponder Anabaptism Animal Advocacy Books Church Ministry Church Planting Community Culture Eschatology Eucharist Evangelical Reject Evolution Fundamentalism Greek Greg Boyd Guest Contributors Hell Holy Spirit Israel/Palestine Kingdom of God Lent Missional N. T. Wright Nationalism New Creation Nonviolence Open Mic Open Theism Parenting Passover Paul Philemon Podcast Politics Restorative Justice Revelation (the book of) Rob Bell Ron Martoia Sermon Shane Claiborne Social Justice Speaking Engagement Spiritual Warfare Spirituality Temple Theology Tim Geddert Tribulation Uncategorized universalism Video Blog Women in Ministry Worship Music Youth Ministry

Select a Month August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 October 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 December 2016 October 2016 August 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Jericho" mean in Hebrew?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Place of fragrance Mount of olives Place of salt Dry ground

Support this
Column