Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

The Pangea Blog

Home

Home
Progressive Christian
The Binding of God: Genesis 22 as a Test Case for Open Theism in the O.T. (part 8) [Problem of Evil]

The Binding of God: Genesis 22 as a Test Case for Open Theism in the O.T. (part 8) [Problem of Evil]

Last updated on: December 2, 2016 at 2:02 pm by Kurt Willems

The Binding of God: Genesis 22 as a Test Case for Open Theism in the O.T. (part 8) [Problem of Evil] 2016-12-02T14:02:07-08:00 Kurt Willems

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In what follows, you will read an “academic paper” in which I explore some elements of open theism (the link is to a brief introduction to open theism). This is a view of God’s foreknowledge that is controversial, but still in the evangelical family of belief. The most well known Christian leader who holds to this view is Greg Boyd. This will be a nine part series.

———————————————————————-

Why This Discussion Matters

Discussions about free will and sovereignty often lead to theological abstraction and argumentation, which rightfully leads one to wonder: What’s the point? Why talk about what God may or may not know? Why create more division over forms of Calvinism and Arminianism? Do we not remember that it is discussions like these that lead to church splits? While these questions represent my initial instincts, I have become convinced that these issues truly matter for the people of God. “The binding of God” offers a test case for thinking about God’s knowledge of how events will turn out, and his reliance on people who willingly choose to carry forward his mission through their obedience. This leads to the primary practical application that God’s openness yields.

The Problem of Evil

Suffering in the world is perhaps the greatest mystery that any person, culture, or nation has to face. No one is exempt from the reality that our world is broken. Shalom is a distant hope, but certainly not a lived experience. As we observed earlier, shalom was lost because humans freely chose to rebel against God’s original ordering of the world. Freedom created a crisis that has not relented. Through Abraham God began the work of responding to the brokenness in creation and through Christ’s resurrection and eventual return, shalom will be realized once again. But between now and then, we must deal with the problem of evil in a concrete fashion. C.S. Lewis, in his book The Problem of Pain states the following about evil in the world:

Christianity asserts that God is good; that He made all things good and for he sake of their goodness; that one of the creatures, by its very nature included the possibility of evil; and that creatures, availing themselves of this possibility, have become evil… It would, no doubt, have been possible for God to remove by miracle the results of the first sin ever committed by a human being; but this would not have been much good unless He was prepared to remove the results of the second sin, and of the third, and so on forever…[this] would have been a world in which nothing important ever depended on human choice, and in which choice itself would soon cease.[1]

What Lewis makes clear is that human freedom, not God, is the source of evil in the world. The problem with the question of suffering is that often a detached yet controlling God is attached as its source. Biblically speaking, God is not directly the source of evil, but rather he created the potential for evil in giving humanity free will (see also the above interpretation of Genesis 3). If God created humanity in any other fashion, we would be the equivalent of robotic androids that were preprogrammed for obedience to God. This would indeed have been a world in which choice and freedom would be nonexistent.

To take this issue to the practical level, we can examine one of the greatest evils in modern history, the Holocaust. Did God know with absolute certainty that Adolf Hitler would murder millions of Jews? If one holds to a view of classical foreknowledge, the answer to this question is yes. But if that is the case, it directs the blame on God. He is not off the hook. An intricate web of free will did not cause this atrocity, but God’s predetermined will did. Not only so, if such a theology leads to the belief that “there is a reason for everything,” then that leads us to the conclusion that God had a divine purpose in the execution of 6 million innocent people. Try having this discussion with a non-Christian; God inevitably comes out the bad guy.

Now if we believe that God only knew that the possibility existed that Adolf Hitler would choose an evil path, then the accountability is shifted mostly off of God and onto the individual. God’s resources are infinite but his choice to not coerce human volition leads to the natural consequences of rebellion. Such evil grieves the heart of God! Yet, he is committed to a free humanity so sometimes the natural outcome of a web of choices cause great devastation. And we should add that it was not merely Hitler who made the Holocaust happen, but there were hundreds of thousands of soldiers who enlisted and took part in a system of oppression. God certainly heard the cry of his people and felt greater pain than those who were burned in the furnaces of Auschwitz.[2] Consider the following reflection on a God who suffers with people in the face of evil in the world:

For a long time I knew that God is not the impassive, unresponsive, unchanging being portrayed by the classical theologians. I knew of the pathos of God. I knew of God’s response of delight and of his response of displeasure. But strangely, his suffering I never saw before. God is not only the God of the sufferers but also the God who suffers. The pain and fallenness of humanity have entered into his heart. Through the prism of my tears I have seen a suffering God.[3]

If we believe that God suffers with us in the midst of evil, then we can be assured that God is not the pain inflicter. He enters into time and space, into our space of anguish. If this is true, then we might discover that we are more motivated to partner with God in confronting evil with love. This is an invitation to activism! As the prophet Micah proclaimed: “He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the LORD require of you? To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God” (Micah 6.8).

[1]. C.S. Lewis, The Problem of Pain (San Francisco: HarperCollins, 1940, 2001), 63, 65.

[2]. Boyd, God of the Possible: A Biblical Introduction to the Open View of God, 98-99.

[3]. Nicholas Wolterstorff, Lament for a Son (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1987), 81.

(Series) The Binding of God [Open Theism]

Previous Post

September 1, 2011

Christendom Against the Kingdom of God (Jason Dye)

Next Post

September 4, 2011 Share Something Sundays – Tell Me About This Weekend’s Church Gathering (Sept 3, 11)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category (Series) All Out War-Spiritual Warfare (Series) Church Plant Journal (Series) Dear Reader... (Series) Earthquakes...Signs of the Times? (Series) Entering the... Conversation (Series) Evangelical Culture Myths (Series) Everything is Meaningless [Pete Enns] (Series) Evolving Evangelicalism (Series) Hell Yes. Hell No! Who Cares? (Series) Hidden Worldviews (Series) If Evolution is Right, what about Adam? (Series) in less than 300 words (Series) Jesus and Nationalism (Series) Liberating Women for Ministry? (Series) Life-Changing Books (Series) Markers of Church Plant Movement (Series) Nonviolence 101 (Series) Philemon - Reconciliation (Series) Quote to Ponder (Series) Red Letter Dialogues (Series) Resource of the Week (SERIES) Revelation Sermons (Series) Share Something Sundays (Series) Simplicity in the Burbs: $2 a day (Series) The Binding of God [Open Theism] (Series) The Creed: Anabaptist Reflections (Series) Values for Church Leadership (Series) Video to Ponder Anabaptism Animal Advocacy Books Church Ministry Church Planting Community Culture Eschatology Eucharist Evangelical Reject Evolution Fundamentalism Greek Greg Boyd Guest Contributors Hell Holy Spirit Israel/Palestine Kingdom of God Lent Missional N. T. Wright Nationalism New Creation Nonviolence Open Mic Open Theism Parenting Passover Paul Philemon Podcast Politics Restorative Justice Revelation (the book of) Rob Bell Ron Martoia Sermon Shane Claiborne Social Justice Speaking Engagement Spiritual Warfare Spirituality Temple Theology Tim Geddert Tribulation Uncategorized universalism Video Blog Women in Ministry Worship Music Youth Ministry

Select a Month August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 October 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 December 2016 October 2016 August 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

According to Ecclesiastes 2, what did the author try in search of meaning?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Worship, prayer, and sacrifice Teaching, healing, and prophecy Pleasure, work, and wisdom Fasting, solitude, and silence

Support this
Column