Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

The Pangea Blog

Home

Home
Progressive Christian
The Binding of God: Genesis 22 as a Test Case for Open Theism in the O.T. (part 7)

The Binding of God: Genesis 22 as a Test Case for Open Theism in the O.T. (part 7)

Last updated on: December 2, 2016 at 2:03 pm by Kurt Willems

The Binding of God: Genesis 22 as a Test Case for Open Theism in the O.T. (part 7) 2016-12-02T14:03:17-08:00 Kurt Willems

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In what follows, you will read an “academic paper” in which I explore some elements of open theism (the link is to a brief introduction to open theism). This is a view of God’s foreknowledge that is controversial, but still in the evangelical family of belief. The most well known Christian leader who holds to this view is Greg Boyd. This will be a nine part series.

———————————————————————-

Other Old Testament Considerations

If the story of Abraham and Isaac were the only example of God not knowing something that would come to pass, then “the binding of God” interpretation could be dismissed as inconsistent with the larger witness of the Old Testament. In reality, there are several instances that demonstrate God’s intimate involvement with humanity, which leads him to facing a partially open future. Noah, for instance is rooted in a situation where God regretted “that he had made humankind on the earth” (Genesis 6.6). This suggests that God hoped that things would have turned out a different way, but they did not. There are several other instances that point to the regretting of God about particular situations such as Saul’s kingship (1 Samuel 15.35). These indicate that God takes risks (see also our exploration of Genesis 3 above) by working with human free will, even if the possibility of flawed results exists as a natural consequence.[1] As Greg Boyd states: “…the only way to deny that God takes risks is to maintain that everything that occurs in world history is exactly what God wanted to occur.”[2]

Not only is God a risk taker, but he also asks questions about future events and their outcomes (see: Numbers 14.11 and Hosea 8.5). This certainly implies that from God’s sovereign perspective that the future is not completely settled. At other times, God experiences surprise (this is not to say it caught him off guard, but that he did not know that such would come to pass with certainty). Jeremiah depicts God as having thought that Israel would return to his righteous covenant, when they did not (3.6-7, 19-20). God, as understood by the open view, knew that this outcome was a possibility, but perhaps held out hope that his people would not actualize disobedience at such a level. Boyd states: “If the future consists in part of possibilities, then God can infallibly think that a particular possibility has the greatest chance of occurring, even if it turns out that a less likely possibility actually occurs.”[3]

Another example of God facing a partially open future is that God often speaks in conditional terms. A clear example of this is found in Exodus 13.17 which states: “If they face war, they might change their minds and return to Egypt.” Clearly God is speaking in terms of a possibility, not a settled matter.[4] Egypt in itself may give us a model for thinking about the dynamics of God’s relationship with his covenant people.

God’s Sovereignty Conditioned in Relationship

Walter Brueggemann gives us a way of thinking about the merging between the sovereignty of God and the dynamic relationship he has with humanity in general and Israel in particular (in the Old Testament). He notes a God who is “sovereign in relationship” rather than being distant.[5] This sovereignty is such that God’s grace and mercy have been identified with a particular people, Israel – who were rescued from slavery in Egypt. God chose to identify with their plight in fidelity with their suffering, which is given as a function of sovereignty and enfleshed through open-ended engagement with this people.[6]

An example of this open-ended engagement is demonstrated by God’s action as a just judge (notice the concreteness of this image). A judge invites a system of justice: either the pharaonic or covenantal.[7] Pharaoh’s justice is oppressive slavery and economic hierarchy. The Lord’s justice is egalitarian, always in fidelity with the vulnerable. Israel was liberated into true justice, only to eventually use their freedom to turn from God’s sovereign design by imposing “forced labor” for the construction of the Temple. Liberated slaves created a social hierarchy that resembles the Pharaoh-Judge rather than YHWH-Judge.[8] Israel walked away from the blessing of cult and relationship with their just Judge. Throughout the Old Testament God would “hear the cry” of his rebellious people and then “liberate” them from calamity that was cause by their choosing of Pharaoh’s way over God. In this way, God related to his people in sovereignty while allowing them the freedom to go their own way.

The Binding of God and a Partially Open Future

It has been demonstrated that the Old Testament has several examples of God allowing people to exercise their freedom. Therefore, God often needed to find out information about them that he would not otherwise have at his disposal. This is evident in “the binding of God” passage in Genesis 22 and throughout the Hebrew Bible. The Bible seems to teach that God faces a partially open future because he has granted humans free will. This does not necessarily mean that there are not settled matters in the future such as prophecy and fulfillment, but that individual choices are not predetermined as such would be paradoxical. God’s sovereignty in relationship gives us the assurance that he is capable of working with humanity to bring the drama of redemption (as initiated in the covenant with Abraham) to its eventual resolution. This will mean the eventual blessing of every square inch of the cosmos. So, although God may be in a bind in that he has chosen not to coerce people into obedience (and therefore may not know every decision we will make), he is willing to walk with us to the mountain of sacrifice to discover if our hearts truly belong to his purposes in the world. The God who is bound is the God who makes us free!

[1]. Gregory A. Boyd, God of the Possible: A Biblical Introduction to the Open View of God (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Books, 2000), 55-57.

[2]. Ibid., 58.

[3]. Ibid., 61.

[4]. Ibid., 69.

[5]. Walter Brueggemann, Old Testament Theology: An Introduction, The Library of Biblical Theology (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 2008), 85ff.

[6]. Ibid., 86-88.

[7]. Ibid.

[8]. Ibid., 105.

(Series) The Binding of God [Open Theism]

Previous Post

August 24, 2011

Bill Hybels Responds to Being Called "Anti-Gay"

Next Post

August 25, 2011 Giving Children Ditch-Water Can Change the World [OR] Please Watch the Video I'm Featured In and Share it Like Crazy! #twakeover

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category (Series) All Out War-Spiritual Warfare (Series) Church Plant Journal (Series) Dear Reader... (Series) Earthquakes...Signs of the Times? (Series) Entering the... Conversation (Series) Evangelical Culture Myths (Series) Everything is Meaningless [Pete Enns] (Series) Evolving Evangelicalism (Series) Hell Yes. Hell No! Who Cares? (Series) Hidden Worldviews (Series) If Evolution is Right, what about Adam? (Series) in less than 300 words (Series) Jesus and Nationalism (Series) Liberating Women for Ministry? (Series) Life-Changing Books (Series) Markers of Church Plant Movement (Series) Nonviolence 101 (Series) Philemon - Reconciliation (Series) Quote to Ponder (Series) Red Letter Dialogues (Series) Resource of the Week (SERIES) Revelation Sermons (Series) Share Something Sundays (Series) Simplicity in the Burbs: $2 a day (Series) The Binding of God [Open Theism] (Series) The Creed: Anabaptist Reflections (Series) Values for Church Leadership (Series) Video to Ponder Anabaptism Animal Advocacy Books Church Ministry Church Planting Community Culture Eschatology Eucharist Evangelical Reject Evolution Fundamentalism Greek Greg Boyd Guest Contributors Hell Holy Spirit Israel/Palestine Kingdom of God Lent Missional N. T. Wright Nationalism New Creation Nonviolence Open Mic Open Theism Parenting Passover Paul Philemon Podcast Politics Restorative Justice Revelation (the book of) Rob Bell Ron Martoia Sermon Shane Claiborne Social Justice Speaking Engagement Spiritual Warfare Spirituality Temple Theology Tim Geddert Tribulation Uncategorized universalism Video Blog Women in Ministry Worship Music Youth Ministry

Select a Month August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 October 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 December 2016 October 2016 August 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who prophesied the exact birthplace of the Messiah?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Micah Jeremiah Isaiah Daniel

Support this
Column