Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

The Pangea Blog

Home

Home
Progressive Christian
The End of Theological Discussion (Guest Post – Nathan McCorkindale)

The End of Theological Discussion (Guest Post – Nathan McCorkindale)

Last updated on: July 6, 2011 at 7:16 pm by Kurt Willems

The End of Theological Discussion (Guest Post – Nathan McCorkindale) 2011-07-06T19:16:08-07:00 Kurt Willems

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Some days I feel like calling for an end to all theological discussion. I hate the way that theology spirals into nasty battles about whose got the corner market on truth.

When I told my co-workers at a a steel manufacturing warehouse that I was quitting to study theology the response I got was, “What is theology?” Literally theology means, “words about God” from the Greek ‘Theos‘ (God) and ‘Logos‘ (words). But is that enough? I believe that it isn’t. The trouble is that when theology is understood as words about God our debates quickly degenerate into a battle of words. We just end up spilling ink and blood over the meanings and ideas. We argue about what one dead white man said over another, walk out the door and don’t change a thing. We feel self righteous that we have successfully defended “the truth” against the “other.”

Here’s the thing. Theology is not our words about God. Theology is our convictions. Convictions are the things that we believe deeply and are critical to our identity. Convictions are the thing that shapes the way we live in the world.

James McClendon writes that theology is the discovery, understanding, articulation, and clarification of the convictions of a convictional community (in this case, the Christian church), including the discovery and critical revision of their relation to one another and to other fields of knowledge (1).

Convictions is a big word. They are central to our identity, even if we do not know what they are until they are challenged. For this reason McClendon challenges us to search out what our convictions are, and discover them.

After we discover our convictions we then need to learn how to understand how our convictions fit together.

Once we are aware of our convictions we also need to articulate them (e.g. “I believe that Jesus is fully God”). Convictions are of no use, if we are unable to speak them in a way that people around us can understand what they are and why they are important.

Finally, is the process of clarification. Perhaps in the process of understanding and articulation we will find that our theology of prayer and theology of God’s sovereignty are like (to use Gonzalez’s term) hot ice cream. We may discover that we cannot keep our theological system the way we thought we could because of new information that has come to light, or a contradiction in the way that things are.

This clarification will always cause discomfort and pain. We do not easily give up our convictions. So we must decide. Will I be open to reworking my theology? Will I return to the Scriptures, the community, the tradition and see if or how my convictions need to change?

Or will I retreat and close my eyes and ears to the challenges to my conviction? Will I lash out at those who question the validity of my convictions? Will I perpetuate a cycle of angry blogs and criticism of those who think differently, because something that has been said challenges what I hold as a core conviction.

Convictions are more than intellectual assent. This, I believe, is why theological debates can degenerate so quickly. Not everything we believe about God is a conviction. There are many beliefs about God that we are willing to take a new look at the evidence and change.

Convictions though, those are protected. Convictions shape the way we live, they drive our evangelism, our prayer, our trust in God. When our convictions are challenged it is natural to respond quickly and angrily. Something essential to our life of faith is being challenged.

Here is where I land. There can be no end to theological discussion. This blog is evidence of the importance of it. Here we have people from all over the world joining together to discuss and debate with each other about the most important subject/object we can know, the person of God.

We need each other to sharpen us. We need each other to challenge our convictions.

I hope though, that we will realize that this is what we are doing. We are poking holes in each others deeply held beliefs, the beliefs that have shaped the way that we understand God’s activity and relationship with us. So my prayer, hope and encouragement to all of us bloggers is twofold.

First, be sensitive to the way in which we engage each other, since we are going way beyond just words, to people’s core beliefs. There is great discomfort in being challenged to rethink things that you have always believed. Secondly, be open to having people challenge your convictions. If our first response is to get angry, defensive, self-righteous, then maybe we need to stop for a moment and enter the process of discovery. This does not mean that our conviction must change. That is to be discovered in our community as we understand, articulate, and clarify our conviction.

I promise that the reworking of our convictions will be painful. But convictions shape how we live in ways that intellectual assent never will, and so we need to be open to the reality that each of us has convictions that the Holy Spirit would like to mold and change.

———————————–

Thanks to my good friend Nathan McCorkindale for this great article.

1)  James McClendon Ethics, 22.

Guest Contributors

Theology

Previous Post

March 2, 2011

Rob Bell Controversy - Your Questions, My Answers OR Why this is a Pastoral Issue!

Next Post

March 7, 2011 Orthodoxy and Exclusion (Guest Article, Alan Molineaux)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category (Series) All Out War-Spiritual Warfare (Series) Church Plant Journal (Series) Dear Reader... (Series) Earthquakes...Signs of the Times? (Series) Entering the... Conversation (Series) Evangelical Culture Myths (Series) Everything is Meaningless [Pete Enns] (Series) Evolving Evangelicalism (Series) Hell Yes. Hell No! Who Cares? (Series) Hidden Worldviews (Series) If Evolution is Right, what about Adam? (Series) in less than 300 words (Series) Jesus and Nationalism (Series) Liberating Women for Ministry? (Series) Life-Changing Books (Series) Markers of Church Plant Movement (Series) Nonviolence 101 (Series) Philemon - Reconciliation (Series) Quote to Ponder (Series) Red Letter Dialogues (Series) Resource of the Week (SERIES) Revelation Sermons (Series) Share Something Sundays (Series) Simplicity in the Burbs: $2 a day (Series) The Binding of God [Open Theism] (Series) The Creed: Anabaptist Reflections (Series) Values for Church Leadership (Series) Video to Ponder Anabaptism Animal Advocacy Books Church Ministry Church Planting Community Culture Eschatology Eucharist Evangelical Reject Evolution Fundamentalism Greek Greg Boyd Guest Contributors Hell Holy Spirit Israel/Palestine Kingdom of God Lent Missional N. T. Wright Nationalism New Creation Nonviolence Open Mic Open Theism Parenting Passover Paul Philemon Podcast Politics Restorative Justice Revelation (the book of) Rob Bell Ron Martoia Sermon Shane Claiborne Social Justice Speaking Engagement Spiritual Warfare Spirituality Temple Theology Tim Geddert Tribulation Uncategorized universalism Video Blog Women in Ministry Worship Music Youth Ministry

Select a Month August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 October 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 December 2016 October 2016 August 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many years between Abraham and David?

Select your answer to see how you score.

800 years 1200 years 1000 years 600 years

Support this
Column