Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

The Pangea Blog

Home

Home
Progressive Christian
A "Tough" Proposal – An Approach to Alleviating Poverty, 2 (Liberal and Conservative Approaches)

A "Tough" Proposal – An Approach to Alleviating Poverty, 2 (Liberal and Conservative Approaches)

Last updated on: July 6, 2011 at 8:10 pm by Kurt Willems

A "Tough" Proposal – An Approach to Alleviating Poverty, 2 (Liberal and Conservative Approaches) 2011-07-06T20:10:34-07:00 Kurt Willems

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This is the second of 3 posts that I plan to do regarding alleviating poverty. This will not be comprehensive in any way shape or form, but aims at doing some critical reflection on the situation we now find ourselves in as American citizens. Everything I write is an interaction with a book titled: Whatever It Takes: Geoffrey Canada’s Quest to Change Harlem and America; by Paul Tough (thus the title). Specifically this will be based on chapter two of this book titled: “Unequal Childhoods.” The first post was concerned with the overarching biblical summons to act on behalf of the poor. This post will now engage in dialogue with Tough’s ideas…

——————————————

Post II: Based on Tough’s essay, what are the similarities / differences in liberal and conservative answers to why people are poor? How are both lacking and what does he propose instead?

According to Tough, the liberal version of why people are poor is mostly a systemic issue. In other words, the conditions in which the people live in the ghettos and poor neighborhoods of America is what keeps people in poverty. He states: “This belief holds that it is the very structure of the American economy that denies poor people sufficient income, and so the appropriate and just solution is to counter those economic forces by providing the poor with what they lack: food, housing, and money” (24). On the opposite pole is the conservative perspective that basically puts accountability on the free individual. He states: “…American poverty is…caused by the bad decisions of poor people themselves and often perpetuated by the very programs designed to help relieve its effects… what the poor need is not handouts, but moral guidance and strict rules” (ibid). From Tough’s perspective both of these polarities are lacking. On the liberal side of the spectrum, Tough would point out that after years of government funding based on perceived and felt needs, the statistics of poverty have not improved as much as the optimism of liberalist ideals would have hoped. On the conservative side of the spectrum, Tough would be quick to demonstrate that it is not simply a morality boost that people in poverty need, you can make moral choices and still remain poor, what is needed is to determine what is causing the cycles to repeat generation after generation.

Tough, who is following the lead of Canada, believes that the solution to poverty and the generational cycle of the inner cities must be addressed by focusing on the children who are growing up in impoverished households. What became evident through many of the studies that he evaluated was that middle class children were often more advanced in the areas needed to be “successful” by American standards than were lower-class children. Heckman’s assessment of The Bell Curve demonstrated the following: “They are poor, this evidence suggested, not because they are genetically flawed, and not because the system denies them opportunities, but because they lack certain skills” (36). In other words, Tough believed that based on this evidence the approach taken must be one that focuses on the children and giving them equal opportunity to acquire the skills needed to end the cycles of their upbringing. For him, and others who take this approach, it does not mean simply ending all government programs that help keep families out of excessive poverty (such as welfare, medi-cal, etc.), but directing such energies to give the children opportunities to acquire the skills they will need in life. This is called the “human-capital” perspective. Tough gives a great summary of this transition:

One advantage of this new perspective was that it took the poverty debate out of the realm of morality… and into the realm of science. Political opinions on poverty had always seemed to be based mostly on gut feelings… The human-capital perspective, by contrast, said, Forget for a moment how different policies make you feel. Instead let’s examine what different policies and interventions actually accomplish (39).

Although the “human-capital” view is one that is full of potential, Tough’s article ends with a great challenge. The way that children develop cognitively within the household demonstrates that lower-class children have a disadvantage. The kids in this situation hear less words that are uttered to them directly as they attempt to build their vocabulary. Not only so, but Farah’s study indicates that such children typically lag in four areas: language, long-term memory, “working memory,” and “cognitive control” (see 46 for more details). The challenge is to now discern how to change the way poorer households operate.

What thoughts does this raise for you regarding how to break cycles of poverty?

Harlem Children's Zone

Previous Post

April 25, 2010

Angels Vs. Messengers... A War of Words? [Earthquakes…Signs of the Times, 6 (Mark 13)]

Next Post

April 29, 2010 The Son of Man Already "Came Back!" [Earthquakes…Signs of the Times, 7 (Mark 13)]

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category (Series) All Out War-Spiritual Warfare (Series) Church Plant Journal (Series) Dear Reader... (Series) Earthquakes...Signs of the Times? (Series) Entering the... Conversation (Series) Evangelical Culture Myths (Series) Everything is Meaningless [Pete Enns] (Series) Evolving Evangelicalism (Series) Hell Yes. Hell No! Who Cares? (Series) Hidden Worldviews (Series) If Evolution is Right, what about Adam? (Series) in less than 300 words (Series) Jesus and Nationalism (Series) Liberating Women for Ministry? (Series) Life-Changing Books (Series) Markers of Church Plant Movement (Series) Nonviolence 101 (Series) Philemon - Reconciliation (Series) Quote to Ponder (Series) Red Letter Dialogues (Series) Resource of the Week (SERIES) Revelation Sermons (Series) Share Something Sundays (Series) Simplicity in the Burbs: $2 a day (Series) The Binding of God [Open Theism] (Series) The Creed: Anabaptist Reflections (Series) Values for Church Leadership (Series) Video to Ponder Anabaptism Animal Advocacy Books Church Ministry Church Planting Community Culture Eschatology Eucharist Evangelical Reject Evolution Fundamentalism Greek Greg Boyd Guest Contributors Hell Holy Spirit Israel/Palestine Kingdom of God Lent Missional N. T. Wright Nationalism New Creation Nonviolence Open Mic Open Theism Parenting Passover Paul Philemon Podcast Politics Restorative Justice Revelation (the book of) Rob Bell Ron Martoia Sermon Shane Claiborne Social Justice Speaking Engagement Spiritual Warfare Spirituality Temple Theology Tim Geddert Tribulation Uncategorized universalism Video Blog Women in Ministry Worship Music Youth Ministry

Select a Month August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 October 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 December 2016 October 2016 August 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What miracle did Elisha perform for a widow?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Made fire fall Raised her son Multiplied oil Fed 5,000

Support this
Column