Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Theology in the Raw

What Christians Ought to Believe

Last updated on: May 20, 2016 at 5:00 am   by Preston Sprinkle

What Christians Ought to Believe 2016-05-19T14:49:56-06:00 Preston Sprinkle

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The follow post is written by my good friend and colleague, Josh Cramer, who reviews Dr. Michael 51yXls1tfSL.SX334_BO1,204,203,200Bird’s forthcoming book, What Christians Ought to Believe: An Introduction to Christian Doctrine Through the Apostles’ Creed (Zondervan: 2016).

 

This year I attended the National Day of Prayer at the Idaho Capitol, naively thinking it would be the Church gathering to pray for the nation. It wasn’t. Instead, it was a recommitment ceremony between Church and state. Or, a one-sided ceremony celebrating the Church’s commitment to America (I’m not sure that America is as committed as we are – it’s not us, it’s her). The normal rites followed: Pledge of Allegiance, National Anthem, “God Bless America”, “America, the Beautiful”, America as fallen “city on a hill”, confusion of nation with Church. I was encouraged that attendees were few and aging. The ceremony reminded me of the soul-shaping ceremony that the Church needs to be living weekly in worship, except idolatrous devotion to Country had replaced appropriate rites to God and Church. We are the Church, with a citizenship liturgy oriented to the Kingdom of God: Baptism, not the Pledge; Eucharist, not the National Anthem; our Lord’s Prayer, not “America, the Beautiful”; creeds, not “God Bless America”.

Australian scholar and theologian Michael Bird’s upcoming book – What Christians Ought to Believe: An Introduction to Christian Doctrine Through the Apostles’ Creed – reintroduces us to an important liturgy for Kingdom citizens. The Apostles’ Creed has been and will be a key citizenship rite for the Church long after America is gone. Christians have used it in worship for millennia and it remains a key ecumenical creed but too many American Christians would rather recite the Pledge than the creeds. Bird’s book is needed to reawaken our hypnotized souls to the beauty of God’s truth.

Bird is a New Testament scholar, an ally of NT Wright. Wright makes plenty of appearances here but so do theologians from various times and traditions – like Irenaus and Hans Urs von Balthasar, for starters. This is not the work of a biblical scholar disconnected from theology or the life of the Church. An introduction to the Apostles’ Creed, What Christians Ought to Believe also signals a theologically robust, ecumenically minded, missional Evangelicalism based on Scripture that resources the Church’s rich tradition.

Bird structures the book around the Creed. Chapters 1 and 2 explore Christian creeds and argue for their use in corporate worship and personal devotion. Chapters 3 through 14 explore the Creed’s affirmations: the nature of “belief” (chapter 3 – for Bird, belief is not just praying a prayer or reciting a creed), the Father (4), Jesus (5 through 11), the Spirit (12), the Church (13), and the purpose and end of creation (14). Most the book focuses on Christ, as does most of the Creed, which is sensible since it is a rite that shapes Christ’s Kingdom citizenry. I found myself learning about our God and worshipping Him as I read. The insights Bird gives for learning, devotion, and discipleship are helpful and profound. Chapter 9 – on the meaning of Christ’s death on the cross – was a favorite . There, Bird beautifully explores and values various atonement models and then invites us to live cruciform lives.

There are as many good things to say about this book as there are … other kinds of things to say about the National Day of Prayer gathering. Bird writes well and accessibly, at home quoting Irenaus/Pannenberg/Balthasar and Stephen Colbert/Joan Osborne/Star Wars. He combines solid biblical scholarship with good historical, churchly theology to ground the Creed in the Scripture’s story. He gives practical and political suggestions for how the Creed might impact Church and world; for Bird, the Creed is not a doctrinal statement divorced from action but a guide to faith and life. Also, Bird is theologically deep, connected to God’s saving acts in history, and tied to our individual lives and collective Church life through time and space. Nearly every time I put What Christians Ought to Believe down, I felt firmly connected to the Scriptures and the Church’s traditions and pondered ways to use the book in my community. My current suggestions: use it in adult Sunday School classes, reading groups, and other adult studies, with new believers, as a textbook for a college theology course, with a church staff to shape the church’s theology and worship life. You would also enjoy and grow from using it for personal study, though I suspect it is used best in community to help Evangelicals shape our worship. The Creed is one of our rites of citizenship, good at forming us as we submit to it, and Bird’s book is a good, biblical, practical guide through it.

Some minor issues. First, the book really starts with chapter 3. Chapters 1 and 2 are fine but things pick up when Bird dives into the Creed itself. I wonder if the material from the first two chapters could have been an introduction, appendix, or sprinkled through later chapters. Second, after reading Bird’s discussion of the creeds in chapter 1, I was not convinced that we were studying the right creed. Why the Apostles’ Creed and not the Nicene, which Bird points out is more complete and more ecumenical? He says that the Apostles’ Creed is more compact, but is that an argument? Third, in his discussion of Jesus’ descent to the dead in chapter 10, Bird explains an unconvincing understanding of Hell and Hades. New to the discussion, I needed more persuasion. If Bird wants to argue for a particular understanding of Jesus’ descent, then maybe an introduction is not the place.

That said, this is a really good book that the Church can use well. Bird shows us the story and character of God, points us to the Church we could and will be, and then encourages us to be that Church with practical suggestions included. I hope that God and Country ceremonies represent American Evangelicalism’s past; I pray that Bird and What Christians Ought to Believe represents global Evangelicalism’s future – biblical and theological, doctrinally sound and missional, Evangelical and ecumenical, gracious and truthful, intelligent and practical, inviting us into the full wonder of our large and loving God.

** Thanks to Preston for the chance to review the book and post on his blog. And thanks to Zondervan for the advance copy for review.*

Apostles creed

book review

Michael Bird

apostles creed

belief

book review

creeds

michael bird

Previous Post



May 16, 2016

UK Speaking Tour

Next Post



May 25, 2016 5 Reasons to Attend Eternity Bible College


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 40 Questions A Letter to my congregation adoption Alan Chambers Alcohol America american Jesus andrew marin angels Anne Paulk Annihilation apology Apostles creed atonement AudioFeed Balkhu Baptism bastard being biblical believer's baptism bible Bible College biblical love biblical studies Boise book review Books buzzwords called celibacy Center for Pastoral Theologians Charis charleston shooting cherubim christian movies Christian teens Christianeze Christmas church Church Refugees civil rights college debt communal faith Conditional Immortality conference david gushee debt free education Dechurched derwin gray desiring the kingdom Discipleship Don Miller Dones ecclesia and ethics Erasing Hell Esther eternal conscious torment Eternity Bible College ethnic diversity ETS eunuch evangelicalism Fight Four Views on Hell Francis Chan Francis Watson Free Bible Resources French Quarter grace gran torino gun control haters hell holy war homeschool homosexuality house church immigration Incarnation individualism Infant Baptism interpretation Intersex Israel James Dunn james smith Jerry Fallwell Jr. Jessica Minassian Jesus Jesus refugee Joey Dodson John MacArthur John Piper John Stott Josh Packard Joshua Ryan Butler judgment Justification Karl Barth Ken Wilson Kevin DeYoung Lance Hancock Leper lesbian LGBT LGBTQ Life Love God liturgy living in a gray world Luke 22 martin luther king mary magdalene Matthew Vines Megan DeFranza Michael Bird millennials Ministry Missions mixed orientation marriage movies Multiethnic churches Music Festival My Exodus N.T. Wright nationalism New Perspective New Year resolution nonviolence obedience Old Testament Online Biblical Training orlando massacre Pacifism parenting pastoral ministry Pastoral Theologian patriotism people to be loved personal relationship with Jesus politics poverty Prayer Preston Sprinkle Project Bayview public square Q Conference qualifications for ministry Racial Reconciliation radio show Reading reading plan real Christianity Reformed refugee refugee crisis rick hogaboam robb bell robert gagnon Romans Romans 13 Romans 9 sam allberry same sex attraction sanctification school segrated churches seraphim sex Sex Difference in Christian Theology sexual fluidity Shawn Gordon short term missions Skeletons in God's Closet Slums Sodom Speaking syrian refugee crisis technology teen girls texting The Bible Project The Gospel Coalition the high definition leader theology Third Way Tim Mackie Touch Nepal trols UK Tour Uncategorized Urban Ministry Us vs. Us Vieux Carre Baptist Church violence vocation Waiting warfare welcome the stranger women women in ministry worship songs writing

Select a Month August 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Gospel" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

God's Truth Sacred Story Good News Holy Word

Related posts from Theology in the Raw

Evangelical

Toward a Critical Review of Robert Song’s Covenant...

Theology in the Raw

Evangelical

Toward a Theology of Same-Sex Relationships

Theology in the Raw

Evangelical

People to Be...Misunderstood: A Response to the Gospel...

Theology in the Raw

Evangelical

Did God Kill Jesus?

Theology in the Raw

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube