The Dangers of Homeschooling: Part 2

Last updated on: January 15, 2015 at 7:30 am by Preston Sprinkle

The Dangers of Homeschooling: Part 2 2015-01-15T07:30:37-06:00 Preston Sprinkle

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A few weeks ago, I posted a blog titled “The Dangers of Homeschooling” and I promised to follow up with a blog about the benefits of homeschooling. Sorry for the delay! I had planned to post the second blog a week after the

Image courtesy of FreeDigitalPhotos.net

first, but the whole Christmas/New Year thing hit and I’m just now waking up. In any case, I’m going to post the anticipated blog “The Benefits of Homeschooling” tomorrow.

But first, I want to respond to some of the criticism I received for first blog, some of which I’ve deleted due to my new comment policy—yes, it works retroactively.

Some readers thought that I was too harsh on homeschoolers in my first blog and have simply had a bad experience with a selective minority. (The large majority of readers, though, thought it was fine.) I’m not sure if these critics read the last paragraph of my blog where I acknowledged that we (aka, my wife) actually home school all of our four kids. Obviously—I thought it was obvious—I see potential value in homeschooling. I therefore still stand by everything I said in the original blog, since I wasn’t saying that home school will lead to the problems mentioned, but may potentially contribute to certain behaviors if the parents aren’t proactively aware of such potential dangers.

I would even add that if you are so zealous about homeschooling and get upset at the mention of any potential problems that homeschooling may bring, then there’s an even better chance that your blindness will cultivate more problems than the ones mentioned in my previous blog. We all need to be self-critical of the way we do things. Business owners, marketers, teachers, doctors—whatever your vocation, whatever your passion—if you want success, you should never become comfortable and think you’re nailing it. Fellow homeschoolers: We own it to the spiritual health of our kids to look for blind spots in our educational method.

Also, some critics were unimpressed by my blog since I didn’t provide sufficient research and statistics. I have two responses to this critique.

First, there’s a difference between quantitative and qualitative research. Quantitative looks at stats, numbers, and other data that can be precisely measured, while qualitative research looks at descriptions, impressions, and other factors that are difficult to measure (yet are equally helpful). My blog was more of the latter. It was my impression based on years of teaching college students who were home schooled, Christian schooled, and public schooled, and talking to many pastors whose churches are filled with all three as well. For what it’s worth, most pastors I know have said that the home school question has been a major source of disunity among their congregants, which any Christian should see as sad. Usually—speaking qualitatively not quantitatively—it’s the “home school only” crowd who are the primary causes of such division.

Second, I’m not sure how one would perform quantitative (statistical) research on the stuff I was talking about. How would you measure with stats and data whether an educational method was more prone to foster self-righteousness, judgmentalism, and social awkwardity (remember: I don’t think homeschooling necessarily produces socially awkward kids)? I think my critics were wanting me to show the educational value of homeschooling, but I never questioned this.

Lastly, one person liked the post but thought the title was misleading: “The Dangers of Homeschooling.” In his view, it made it sound like homeschooling necessarily leads to the problems I mentioned in the blog, even though, as he acknowledged, my actually post wasn’t so black and white. And this is true. It’s a fair critique. But for what it’s worth, I often pick blog titles that provoke thought and draw people in. This is a basic rule in the blogger’s handbook: Avoid dull titles. (And long ones too, for that matter.) When I title a blog, I do so to draw readers in with the hopes that the content of the actual blog will clarify what I mean by the title. In this case, the content of my blog shows that I was addressing the potential dangers of homeschooling—not the inevitable dangers that will come true with every single kid who was ever schooled by his parents.

So let’s call it a draw. The title was a bit overstated. But it got your attention, no?

Stay tuned tomorrow for my third and final (I think?) blog on this topic: “The Benefits of Homeschooling.”

Previous Post

January 9, 2015

An Open Conversation on Mixed Orientation

Next Post

January 16, 2015 The Benefits of Homeschooling

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 40 Questions A Letter to my congregation adoption Alan Chambers Alcohol America american Jesus andrew marin angels Anne Paulk Annihilation apology Apostles creed atonement AudioFeed Balkhu Baptism bastard being biblical believer's baptism bible Bible College biblical love biblical studies Boise book review Books buzzwords called celibacy Center for Pastoral Theologians Charis charleston shooting cherubim christian movies Christian teens Christianeze Christmas church Church Refugees civil rights college debt communal faith Conditional Immortality conference david gushee debt free education Dechurched derwin gray desiring the kingdom Discipleship Don Miller Dones ecclesia and ethics Erasing Hell Esther eternal conscious torment Eternity Bible College ethnic diversity ETS eunuch evangelicalism Fight Four Views on Hell Francis Chan Francis Watson Free Bible Resources French Quarter grace gran torino gun control haters hell holy war homeschool homosexuality house church immigration Incarnation individualism Infant Baptism interpretation Intersex Israel James Dunn james smith Jerry Fallwell Jr. Jessica Minassian Jesus Jesus refugee Joey Dodson John MacArthur John Piper John Stott Josh Packard Joshua Ryan Butler judgment Justification Karl Barth Ken Wilson Kevin DeYoung Lance Hancock Leper lesbian LGBT LGBTQ Life Love God liturgy living in a gray world Luke 22 martin luther king mary magdalene Matthew Vines Megan DeFranza Michael Bird millennials Ministry Missions mixed orientation marriage movies Multiethnic churches Music Festival My Exodus N.T. Wright nationalism New Perspective New Year resolution nonviolence obedience Old Testament Online Biblical Training orlando massacre Pacifism parenting pastoral ministry Pastoral Theologian patriotism people to be loved personal relationship with Jesus politics poverty Prayer Preston Sprinkle Project Bayview public square Q Conference qualifications for ministry Racial Reconciliation radio show Reading reading plan real Christianity Reformed refugee refugee crisis rick hogaboam robb bell robert gagnon Romans Romans 13 Romans 9 sam allberry same sex attraction sanctification school segrated churches seraphim sex Sex Difference in Christian Theology sexual fluidity Shawn Gordon short term missions Skeletons in God's Closet Slums Sodom Speaking syrian refugee crisis technology teen girls texting The Bible Project The Gospel Coalition the high definition leader theology Third Way Tim Mackie Touch Nepal trols UK Tour Uncategorized Urban Ministry Us vs. Us Vieux Carre Baptist Church violence vocation Waiting warfare welcome the stranger women women in ministry worship songs writing

Select a Month August 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who recognized Jesus as "the Christ" in the Temple as an infant?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Simeon Zechariah Peter Joseph