Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Sports and Religion
Olympics 2024: Celebrating Dionysius at The Lord’s Table?

Olympics 2024: Celebrating Dionysius at The Lord’s Table?

Last updated on: August 2, 2024 at 11:44 am by Anthony Costello

0 Comments

Olympics 2024: Celebrating Dionysius at The Lord’s Table? 2024-08-02T11:44:53-07:00 Anthony Costello

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Editors Note: This is a guest post by Christian author and speaker Kaon Serjani.

Immediately following the Opening Ceremony of the Paris 2024 Olympics, there was global controversy among Christians who interpreted certain segments as a mockery of Da Vinci’s The Last Supper. Some organizers clarified that it was intended to depict Bacchanalia, an ancient Roman festival honoring (Dionysus). Throughout history, Bacchanalia has involved dancing, singing, and revelry, focused on the worship of Dionysus, the Olympian god revered in Greco-Roman religion as the deity of nature, fertility, vegetation, wine, and ecstasy. According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, Bacchanalia also means “orgy.”

The Intent of the Organizer’s Imagery

For those unfamiliar with Da Vinci’s painting, it portrays the biblical account of Jesus sharing his last Passover meal with his disciples, where he discusses the forthcoming sacrifice he will make to atone for the sins of humanity. This image holds significant importance in Christian faith, and the portrayal of this scene in a mocking manner parallels the mockery Jesus endured in the hours leading up to his crucifixion.

Art historian, Sasha Grishin, who is professor emeritus at the Australian National University, said for The New York Times that

The idea of the central figure with a halo and a group of followers on either side — it’s so typical of ‘The Last Supper’ iconography that to read it in any other way might be a little foolhardy

“An Olympic Scene Draws Scorn. Did it Really Parody ‘The Last Supper?'” by Yan Zhuang

The ambiguity of the organizers’ intentions has finally been resolved. The producers of the Opening Ceremony admitted in a statement that

For the ‘Festivities’ segment, Thomas Jolly took inspiration from Leonardo da Vinci’s famous painting to create the setting,

and then added that

Clearly, there was never an intention to show disrespect towards any religious group or belief … [Jolly] is not the first artist to make a reference to what is a world-famous work of art. From Andy Warhol to ‘The Simpsons,’ many have done it before him.

“Paris Olympic Producers Say ‘Las Supper’ Inspired The Opening Ceremony Scene” by Stephanie Kaloi

After hearing from all parties—the organizers, Christian leaders, and independent observers—it appears unnecessary to decide whether the show depicted The Last Supper or Bacchanalia. It encompassed both. This dual portrayal may itself be enlightening. The event celebrated Dionysus at the table of Jesus’s last supper with his disciples, making the show not just a mockery of Christianity but also an affirmation of ancient Greek paganism. It can be seen as a statement of substitution, replacing the former with the latter.

A Pagan Parody of “The Last Supper?”

But Why Dionysius?

Why Dionysus? If we give it some thought, it appears to be a deliberate choice rather than a coincidence. When the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche critiqued Christianity in the 19th century and called for a return to pagan culture, he selected Dionysus as his ideal among the Olympian gods. Nietzsche viewed Dionysus as a counterpart to Jesus, famously coining the phrase “Dionysus against the Crucified.” For Nietzsche, “The god on the cross [Christ] is a curse on life,” while “Dionysus … is a promise of life.”

Nietzsche explained,

We few or many who again dare to live in a demoralized world, we pagan in faith: we are probably also first to grasp what a pagan faith is . . . We believe in Olympus—and not in the ‘Crucified.’

Nietzsche, The Will to Power

Thus, despite his generic anti-religious stance, Nietzsche clarified there was one kind of religious man he did not exclude from his philosophy of life: the pagan.

The scene that sparked controversy during the Opening Ceremony seemed to endorse a revival of pre-Christian morality, evoking the Greek pagan era through a Nietzschean lens. It openly suggested celebrating Dionysus over Jesus. One fundamental reason for this perspective stems from Jesus’s advocacy for an exclusive moral framework that delineates clear boundaries between right and wrong in various aspects of human life, including sexuality—a stance that conflicts with the sentiments of many in the West today.

No serious historian disputes that Western civilization has been deeply influenced by Christian morals for millennia. Larry W. Hurtado argued in his 2017 book that since the first century, Jesus has been depicted as a “destroyer of the gods.” Hurtado illustrates how Jesus’ movement introduced a distinctive religious identity with ethical principles that set it apart from Greek religions. If Jesus, and consequently Christianity, were merely one among many moral interpretations, Nietzsche would probably not have objected. In The Birth of Tragedy, Nietzsche observed, in paganism, an inclusive and pluralistic religious culture where multiple moralities coexisted. No pagan god asserted dominance over any other; each presided over their own domain of life: for example, the god of war did not interfere with the god of fertility, and there was no “claim to priority of rank.”

The Christian God, on the other hand, in alignment with the Jewish concept of deity, exalted Himself above all other gods, condemning them as false deities. In Thus Spake Zarathustra, Nietzsche wrote that

That happened, when the most godless word issued from one of the gods themselves—the word: ‘There is one god. Thou shalt have no other god before me!’

Consequently, Nietzsche blamed Judeo-Christian faith for the demise of pagan gods and accused it of advocating an exclusive morality. In The Will to Power, he went even further to add

I have declared war on the anemic Christian ideal…, not with the aim of destroying it but only of putting an end to its tyranny and clearing the way for new ideals, for more robust ideals.

Olympics 2024 and The New Old Ideals of Neopaganism

English philosopher Frederick Copleston concurred that

Dionysus, for Nietzsche, symbolizes the unbridled stream of life itself, breaking down all barriers and disregarding all restraints.

Copleston, A History of Philosophy, Vol. VII

The Festivals of Dionysus in ancient Athens are known in history for gatherings where societal norms were challenged and behaviors, typically taboo, such as indulging in sexual activities, were embraced. Christianity, from its inception, opposed this ethos. That is why, the “will to a single morality” is for Nieztsche “a tyranny over other types.” Within this context, featuring Dionysus at “The Last Supper” during the Opening Ceremony serves as a Nietzschean declaration aimed at overthrowing the perceived “tyranny” of Christian ideals and ethics. It is the pagan reassertion over its one-time conqueror. As Chesterton once quipped, “Paganism was the biggest thing, Christianity was bigger, everything since has been comparatively small.” Well, in Paris, paganism made the most recent attempt to get big again.

Both Christianity and Nietzsche’s paganism aim at the salvation of humanity, each with soteriological objectives. Giles Fraser in his book Redeeming Nietzsche, agrees that “Nietzsche uses Dionysus to articulate a post-Christian soteriology parallel to ‘traditional’ atonement theology.” While Christianity seeks to redeem humanity from the consequences of sin, Nietzsche sought to liberate humanity from Christianity itself, which he perceived as attributing inherent sinfulness to every individual. Christianity aims to unite humanity with Christ, whereas Nietzsche seeks a connection with Dionysus. Christianity aims to save humanity from sin and guilt through the crucifixion; Nietzsche aims to liberate humanity from sin and guilt by denying their existence.

Hence, the Opening Ceremony aligned with Nietzsche’s Dionysian ethos, which seeks to replace Christian morality. This event is not an isolated incident; instead, it highlights a profound, ongoing struggle for the soul of the West: the struggle between God and the gods.

About the Author:

Kaon Serjani studied journalism at University of Tirana and later completed an MA in Christian Apologetics and Ethics at Denver Seminary in the US. For 15 years, he was engaged in evangelism through Cru ministry until the summer of 2022, when, together with his wife, he founded the Institute for Faith and Cultural Engagement, an initiative aimed at creating a safe environment for raising questions about faith and receiving credible answers. Kaon is passionate about literature, philosophy, apologetics and theology and particularly answering the heartfelt questions and objections people have about the Christian faith. He has an expertise on the philosophy of German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche. Kaon is married to Danjela, has two young boys, and they live in Tirana, Albania.

Sports and Religion

Apologetics

Cultural Apologetics

Philosophy of Religion

Previous Post

June 28, 2024

Paganism Book Review: Response to "Under The Ancient Oaks"