What is Fr. Martin’s Endgame?

Last updated on: May 30, 2024 at 6:08 am by Dennis Knapp

0 Comments

What is Fr. Martin’s Endgame? 2024-05-30T06:08:28-06:00 Dennis Knapp

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This weekend, I watched the 2021 documentary Building a Bridge, based on the 2018 book of the same name by Fr. James Martin, SJ. As I watched the documentary, I found myself agreeing with some of the points concerning compassion and kindness. However, Building the Bridge left me with more questions than answers as to how the Church ought to build a bridge to the Catholics within the LGBT community, especially if said Catholics see themselves as made by God as LGBT.

For this article, I ask the questions that often came into my head during my viewing. I highlight some of the comments made by Fr. Martin that stood out to me. Finally, I ask Fr. Martin directly what his endgame is concerning the Catholic Church bridge towards Catholics who consider themselves first and foremost members of the LGBT community.

Unwelcomed, Excluded, and Insulted Towards Respect, Compassion, and Sensitivity

In the documentary, and in his book, Fr. Martin reports that many Catholics who identify as LGBT hold many strong feelings towards the institutional Church. In his book, he states:

But many LGBT Catholics have told me that they have felt hurt by the institutional church—unwelcomed, excluded, and insulted.

He goes on to challenge the Church to treat LGBT Catholics with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Here, Fr. Martin echoes the words of the Catechism of the Catholic Church paragraph 2358:

The number of men and women who have deep-seated homosexual tendencies is not negligible. This inclination, which is objectively disordered, constitutes for most of them a trial. They must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided. These persons are called to fulfill God’s will in their lives and, if they are Christians, to unite to the sacrifice of the Lord’s Cross the difficulties they may encounter from their condition.

Moreover, if this represents the crux of Fr. Martin’s call to the institutional Church (and the Catholics with her) to build their side of the bridge, I fully support it. However, the catechism goes on in paragraph 2359 to address the bridge’s other half:

Homosexual persons are called to chastity. By the virtues of self-mastery that teach them inner freedom, at times by the support of disinterested friendship, by prayer and sacramental grace, they can and should gradually and resolutely approach Christian perfection.

Therefore, just as the Church (and those in her) must exercise respect, compassion, and sensitivity, those who identify as LGBT Catholics must live lives of chastity, self-mastery, prayer, and sacramental grace (as must all Catholics).

Would Fr. Martin agree with this assessment?

Does Sensitivity Mean Change?

In the chapter on sensitivity of the Church towards LGBT Catholics, Fr. Martin takes to task the insensitive use of the words objectively disordered in paragraph 2358 of Catechism (see above).

Our sexuality, in a sense, touches everything we do, including the way we love, even with the sexual expression of that love is neither involved nor even contemplated. So to call a person’s sexuality “objectively disordered” is to tell a person that all of his or her love, even the most chaste, is disordered. That seems unnecessarily cruel.

He contends that the use of such language produces harm in those who hear and read it and therefore ought to change. In June 2017, Fr. Martin reported in an interview that he liked the term “differently ordered,” proposed to him by an Italian theologian.

Now, ordered and disordered, in this context, come from an understanding of natural law, and as Fr. Martin claims, he does not see himself as a theologian. However, as a Catholic priest (and Jesuit), Fr. Martin is more a theologian than almost all lay Catholics. Furthermore, those who agree with him also see him as such, regardless of whether he sees it himself. Given these facts, changing the precise language of the Catechism out of a sense of sensitivity reframes all Catholic teaching on human sexuality.

Is this what the non-theologian Fr. Martin, SJ, proposes?

**“I’m Not Supposed to Support It…”**

As Fr. Martin goes about promoting his book and speaking in various places, many people come to him and ask if he plans on attending the approaching local Pride parade. One man even pleads with him that his presence as a priest is desperately needed there. In response, Fr. Martin states that he must first obtain the approval of his superior before attending such an event. He thinks such approval unlikely (he later informs us his superiors denied his request), as he may “get a photo taken in front of a gay marriage sign” and laments, “I’m not supposed to support it…” He did not state he cannot support it, only that he’s not “supposed to support it.”

Moreover, in his book, Fr. Martin intentionally omits any lengthy discussion on the Church’s teaching on same-sex relations and same-sex marriage. The reason: the two sides (the Church and the LGBTQ community) stand too far apart to allow for any kind of bridge building on these issues. Yet, when Fr. Martin does quote the Catechism on the nature of same-sex relations, he only speaks of how insensitive and hurtful the language is. Therefore, Fr. Martin understands that the Church and the LGBTQ community (and Catholics in those community) stand too far apart, however, the Church acts cruelly in the language it uses and ought to change it.

Does the non-theologian Fr. Martin not understand that changing the language on same-sex relations changes Church teaching? Maybe he does…

Fr. Martin, What is Your Endgame?

Fr. Martin, what is your ultimate end goal in building a bridge between the Church and LGBT Catholics who identify with the LGBT community first and the Church second (or not at all)? You rightly state in the documentary, and book, that all baptized Catholics have a place within the Church. You also state that the Church teaches things regarding same-sex relations that bar the building of any bridges, a distance too far to cross. However, in your book, you call out the Church’s insensitive and cruel language in calling same-sex relations “objectively disordered” and indicated in an interview that you prefer the phrase “differently ordered.” As you know, such a change in language entails a change in the Church’s understanding of human sexuality. In the spirit of respect, compassion, and sensitivity must the Church change its views in order to build a true bridge. To some, it appears so.

Final Thoughts…

For my final thoughts, I affirm what the Church teaches regarding respect, compassion, and sensitivity towards those within the LGBT Catholic community. I fully embrace what the Catechism states in paragraphs 2357, 2358, and 2359. While watching the documentary and reading the book, these questions often crossed my mind:

Does Fr. Martin agree with the assessment that all Catholics must live lives of chastity, self-mastery, prayer, and sacramental grace (LGBT Catholics included)?
Out of a sense of sensitivity, should the Church reframe all Catholic teaching on human sexuality?

It seems clear to me that ultimately Fr. Martin seeks to change Church teaching; not directly, but through a push for respect, compassion, and sensitivity beyond that reflected in the Catechism. Only by changing the Church’s teaching on human sexuality can the true bridge be built. To me, this seems Fr. Martin’s ultimate endgame.

If wrong, I stand ready for his correction.