Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Religion News
Guest Contributor Todd Flowerday: Fear is Useless; What is Needed is Trust

Guest Contributor Todd Flowerday: Fear is Useless; What is Needed is Trust

Last updated on: September 2, 2023 at 10:54 am by Dennis Knapp

0 Comments

Guest Contributor Todd Flowerday: Fear is Useless; What is Needed is Trust 2023-09-02T10:54:24-06:00 Dennis Knapp

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In the spirit of dialogue, I provided one of my critics a space to contribute. His essay is below. Thank you for reading.

Fear is useless; what is needed is trust

From the last thread, it’s no secret I was alarmed at Cardinal Burke’s seeming ignorance on the history of Church meetings–councils, synods, and other forms of consultation. In its broad sense, synodality happens all the time in the Church: parish councils, finance committees, and even the one-on-one experiences common in everyday life. Sometimes, democracy is practiced, as in the election of abbesses and abbots, religious superiors, and even a pope. Sometimes these meetings come to nothing. Sometimes, a person finds themselves deep in a conversion event, and their relationship with God has intensified or been renewed—all this without a vote or even an opinion.

Cardinal Burke penned an introduction to a self-published pamphlet listing a round number of concerns wrapped in questions and self-provided answers. He is free to do so. And he has his opinions, some of which are based on his knowledge of Church teaching, but others based on his personal experiences and his suspicions, of which none have really come to pass–at least in terms of changing Church teaching.

My reading of the synod documents is that the Church is on a path to reconsider how we present ourselves to the world. Our prime mission is not to attend to people already with us, but to evangelize the doubtful, the embittered, the skeptics, and yes–even the sinners.

The cardinal’s words are colored red. My responses follow.

“We are told that the Church which we profess, in communion with our ancestors in the faith from the time of the Apostles, to be One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic is now to be defined by synodality, a term which has no history in the doctrine of the Church and for which there is no reasonable definition.”

Cardinal Burke plays a little loose with two things here. First, Pope Francis has said that “synodality expresses the nature of the Church, its form, its style, its mission.” That is not a definition; it is an outward way of being, of presenting the Church to others, both Christians and non-believers.

If the Church is a barque, synodality is the painting of the boat, the width of its gangplank, the arrangement of the dining room, among other similar things. Most importantly, the assignment of friendly crew to welcome passengers. We aren’t talking about changing from steam to nuclear power, nor eliminating meals, nor asking people to swim to the boat. The boat and its journey remain the same.

As for the term synodality, it is an invented noun that does indeed have a meaning. Professor Jessica Murdoch was quoted here (https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/39731/what-is-synodality-experts-explain):

“Synodality as a concept really just means collegiality. It is the way in which the different parts of the Church come together as the mystical Body of Christ.”

Meetings of all sorts happen on all levels of the Church. Councils and popes work together to address major issues. Synods are convened for bishops to address regional matters or single topics. These have been regular occurrences for the past sixty years. Cadl Burke hasn’t objected this strenuously before. In fact, he has even participated in them.

On the diocesan level, bishops consult with many advisory boards. In parishes, pastors have committees and councils. Two people meet to share faith over a cup of coffee or a beer. Synodality is all of these, a notion that two or more people come together in faith (cf. Matthew 18:20) to further the mission of Jesus in some way, large or small.

Synodality and its adjective, synodal, have become slogans behind which a revolution is at work to change radically the Church’s self-understanding, in accord with a contemporary ideology which denies much of what the Church has always taught and practiced.

And yet, Cdl Burke offers no proof of his suspicions. And attributing that motive to the synod as a whole and its participants causes doubts to be raised about people who may have other issues wholly within the bounds of orthodoxy, who are honestly participating in the synod. This is imprudent on his part.

Synod supporters recognize the Catholic Church is in deep trouble. (Even some synod skeptics admit it too.) A council failed to realize its full potential. World Youth Days and other initiatives of St John Paul II have failed to stem the mass youth exodus from the faith.

A universal catechism assembled three decades ago doesn’t seem to have improved the state of religious education. People still complain about poor catechesis. A papacy by a well-regarded theologian ended in resignation and, on the part of many of his supporters, confusion about who is really the Bishop of Rome.

A generous allowance for an older style of worship has been rescinded, failing to meet its own goal of mutual enrichment of both forms of the Mass. Instead it deepened divisions within Roman Catholicism, especially in the US and western Europe.

It seems that most initiatives to recover tradition have been cheered by a small minority, and still: in the First World, the Church shrinks in membership and influence.

To many observers, even some traditionalists and conservatives, what we’ve been doing hasn’t worked. The old format of synods doesn’t seem to have budged the ship. The curia used to produce preliminary documents to guide the topics and narrow the discussion in synods. That process has been scuttled for this synod. It would seem we can’t do worse than try something new.

It is not a purely theoretical matter, for the ideology has already, for some years, been put into practice in the Church in Germany, spreading widely confusion and error and their fruit, division – indeed schism – , to the grave harm of many souls.

It is true that individual pastors have taken matters into their own hands here and there throughout the history of the Church. I knew a priest who ordained his own deacons—twelve of them—before the permanent diaconate was authorized in his diocese. He fancied himself a sort-of Jesus who needed twelve to assist him. Imagine the confusion when a new pastor was assigned and discovered he has a dozen “assistant clergy” operating in various roles.

Many bishops thought they were protecting the reputation and finances of their dioceses by handling crimes of their clergy silently. Many promised that predators would be handled and would do no more harm. They ignored the sound advice of their own priests and psychologists, choosing instead to listen to people who agreed with their policies. So-called orthodox bishops were outed for crimes of mismanagement, lying, and cooperating more readily with predators—and a few of them were even bounced out of their administrative role by their own sins. This is the scandal that has caused more harm than the odd opinion about women’s ordination.

Mistakes by pastors, even bishops, do indeed cause people to be chased away from the Church. I’m not sure that a gay person who imagines their relationship is accepted on some level is worse than someone who has experienced something so traumatic as rape by a priest and subsequently cannot bear to return to the Church.

Where Cdl. Burke misses the boat is to fail to look to people who are no longer with us. Indeed, I’d rather have same-sex couples and remarried persons coming to Mass, and experiencing the graces of liturgy, than to find them absent from the Sunday assembly. Are they really going to buy Bishop Barron’s latest book or visit this blog to get some come-to-Jesus moment? That’s hardly likely.

We know that the orthodox approach to silence, management, and vocations has also spread division. But we really can’t do nothing.

With the imminent Synod on Synodality, it is rightly to be feared that the same confusion and error and division will be visited upon the universal Church.

I don’t think this fear is grounded. We’ve experienced a lot of “confusion, error, and division” in the past few decades, some perpetrated by people who were once assessed as the “good guys.” We’ve lost a lot of people. I’d rather listen to the ones who left and assess the synodal direction based in part on that. Let’s not be afraid to ask ourselves: what have we done wrong?

In fact, it has already begun to happen through the preparation of the Synod at the local level. Only the truth of Christ, as it is handed down to us in the unchanging and unchangeable doctrine and discipline of the Church, can address effectively the situation by uncovering the ideology at work, by correcting the deadly confusion and error and division it is propagating, and by inspiring the members of the Church to undertake the true reform which is daily conversion to Christ alive for us in the Church’s teaching, her prayer and worship, and her practice of the virtues and discipline.

I suspect Pope Francis and others are well aware that some are advocating for moral adjustment on relationships, or an administrative development in ordaining women to the diaconate or more. These are not the only advocacies, nor are they by any means universally accepted, even by progressive Catholics. I also suspect that Pope Francis is willing to let Matthew 13:24-30 be in play here. If well-known teaching and policy as detailed in the Catechism hasn’t taken root, perhaps adult discussions will reinforce Church teaching. After all, are some bishops like Raymond Burke likely to be convinced to change their minds? I think not.

Dennis asked me to provide an accompanying image for this piece. I chose James Tissot’s late 19th century painting “Jesus Discourses with His Disciples.” It illustrates synodality well to me: people not in lockstep, some straggling behind, but for those who approach close to the Lord, his encouraging and gentle hand. No Christian need be afraid of that.

For myself, I pray a composition attributed to Saint Isidore of Seville, also used at the Second Vatican Council:

We stand before you, Holy Spirit,

conscious of our sinfulness,

but aware that we gather in your name.

Come to us, remain with us,

and enlighten our hearts.

Give us light and strength to know your will,

to make it our own, and to live it in our lives.

Guide us by your wisdom,

support us by your power,

for you are God,

sharing the glory of Father and Son.