The New Testament Was An Afterthought

Last updated on: January 6, 2022 at 9:52 am by Dennis Knapp

The New Testament Was An Afterthought 2022-01-06T09:52:01-06:00 Dennis Knapp

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The New Testament (NT) was not an historical inevitability. At best, the NT was a product of God’s passive will, not His active will. If one takes an infinitesimal amount of time to evaluate the historical record, this truth becomes crystal clear. In this post, I posit that, contrary to the current assumption that sees the NT as an historically inevitability, it was in fact not. On the contrary, the historical record shows the NT a byproduct of opportunity born out of necessity. Moreover, the Church was (and is) a part of God’s active will and exists with or without the written works she produced.

Evangelicals have typically given little consideration to the formation of the New Testament and its possible implications on a doctrine of Scripture. Most evangelical consideration of canon history, if considered at all, assumes the existence of a New Testament canon from the very beginning of Christianity itself, or at least when the first document of the New Testament was completed (Allert, C. D. (2007). A high view of scripture?: The authority of the Bible and the formation of the New Testament).

The First New Testament List A Reaction

According to some scholars, the NT was a product of necessity. Church authorities sought to collect an authoritative list of approved books to counter the heretic Marcion’s (mid-second century) compilation of altered ones. Marcion rejected the whole of the Old Testament and believed it the work of an evil deity. He removed all references to the Old Testament in his New Testament. Other scholars, Allert included, see Marcion’s influence on the NT canon to a lesser degree. Agreement exists that Marcion’s list of books did engender a response. In response to heresy, the borders of orthodoxy become defined. The borders of the NT canon required definition.

The NT was composed between 50 and 100 AD. The earliest list of 27 NT books (our current canon) appears in the Thirty-Ninth Festal Letter of Athanasius of Alexandria in 367 AD. The first councils to recognize this list: the Council of Rome in 382 AD and the Council of Hippo in 393 AD. Please note the time: the three centuries since Christ’s earthly ministry and over 250 years since the death of the Apostle John in 100 AD for the Church to produce a modern list.

The New Testament Up For Debate

And what of the content of the New Testament canon? Of the many works produced in the first 150 years of Christianity, some were universally included (the Gospels, Acts, and writings of Paul), others included reluctantly (James, Jude, 2 Peter, 3 John, Hebrews, and the Book of Revelation), and still others rejected (the Didache, the Shepherd of Hermas, Gospel of the Hebrew, and Acts of Paul) (Eusebius Book III, Chapter 25).

Furthermore, the Apostles left the Church no table of contents. Those who came after (through apostolic succession) had the task to determine the final canon. Scripture contains no list of inspired books either explicitly or implicitly. There exists no biblical justification for the content of the Bible. All who read and cherish the NT rely on the Church to inform them what books belong in it.

There exists no biblical justification for the content of the Bible. All who read and cherish the NT rely on the Church to inform them what books belong in it.

A New Testament Never Commanded By Jesus

Jesus never commanded a word of His to be written down. He commanded the Apostles to preach, not to write. The writing came later (as demonstrated above). The Church decided to write down the story of the life of Jesus, not in response to Jesus’ command, but in response to a need born out of necessity. Jesus commanded his followers preach because those who heard could NOT read, but they could listen—listen to His Church.

The Church existed decades before a single letter written in the NT. Those in the Church wrote every word of the NT and those in the Church eventually determined the approved content of the NT. Moreover, as the Church’s book, the proper interpretation of the NT (and the whole Bible) belongs to the Church. Jesus established a Church, not a book club. God allowed the Church to write and compile a book. He never commanded its creation and the Church exists with or without it.

Like what you read? Please check out my other writing here.

Please like and follow me on Facebook.

Previous Post

December 23, 2021

Confession in the Early Church: Fact or Fiction?

Next Post

January 6, 2022 The Jesus Prerogative: On Women Priests

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Arius Atheists Catholic Apologetics Catholic Culture Catholic History Catholic Humor Catholic Poetry Catholic Politics Catholic Theology Dr. James White Faith Alone Joe Heschmeyer Kamala Harris Martin Luther Pope Francis Preborn Children President Biden Science and Catholicism Sola Scriptura Synod of Synodality Trinity

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which tribe did NOT ask for land on the east side of Jordan?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Manasseh Gad Issachar Reuben