Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

The Freethinker

Home
Nonreligious
In Australia, Anglicans have a serious domestic abuse problem

In Australia, Anglicans have a serious domestic abuse problem

Last updated on: June 14, 2021 at 8:56 pm by Barry Duke

In Australia, Anglicans have a serious domestic abuse problem 2021-06-14T20:56:15+02:00 Barry Duke

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

IT’S been known for years that a shockingly high rate of domestic violence among practicing Anglicans in Australia was the church’s dirty little secret – until 2017 when an ABC News investigation blew the lid off the issue, and was promptly accused of ‘waging war on Christianity’.

Image via YouTube

In response to the exposé, then Anglican Primate of Australia, Archbishop Philip Freier, above, said that victims of domestic violence deserved an apology from the church.

What followed was an official probe by the Church, and last week it released the National Anglican Family Violence Research Report that confirmed that
the incidence of domestic abuse is greater amongst Anglicans in Australia than the general population.

The report also found that perpetrators used Biblical teachings to justify abuse, and that those who attended church regularly were more likely to have been in an abusive relationship than those who didn’t.

A few weeks later after the ABC News exposé, the General Synod of the Anglican Church apologised to victims, acknowledging they had been let down by church leaders and teachings, and promised to undertake independent research into the nature and extent of family violence in Anglican communities.

Clergy wives then began telling their stories to the news outlet. They spoke of husbands insisting their role as women was to submit to “male headship” — a literal interpretation of the Bible whereby the man is the “head” of the woman.

ABC News reported the doctrine was being used by perpetrators to justify their abuse on these theological grounds, as well as others relating to forgiveness and the sanctity of marriage.

The new research confirmed this, finding:

Christian teachings sometimes contribute to and potentially amplify situations of domestic violence.

The report says that strict teachings:

On marriage as a lifelong commitment, the submission of the wife to the husband, unconditional forgiveness, and suffering for Christ – whether they are taught by church leaders, internalised by victim survivors, or co-opted by abuser in this way – are harmful for those who experience abuse.

It also found nine out of ten clergy believed abusers misused biblical teachings to support abuse – and eight out of ten recognised the doctrine of male headship was a factor “at least some of the time”.

Image via Wiki CC

In a weekend op-ed written for The Sydney Morning Herald, Julia Baird, above, said*:*

It’s a stunning finding, worse than predicted, and horrific to think that what should be a place of refuge could be in fact a place of peril for women, and that, despite some recent efforts and the fact that evidence of this has been reported on for years, many clergy remain in denial about it.

She added:

The Christian faith is one of mercy, love and acceptance, so these findings are understandably anathema to the faithful. Awareness has grown markedly in recent years, some action has been taken, clergy training programs run, protocols drafted and agreed.

But where is the urgency, the garment-tearing, the rage, shame, fury and thunder from the church, that this is happening in its ranks? Why do anything else at all until this is resolved? Where is the suggestion from archbishops (as there was in Sydney over marriage equality) that clergy rush to the pulpit to denounce the abuse violence of women …?

The muted response from leaders was one of sadness, but survivors need to see sweeping action, and recognition of the true depth and breadth of the problem.

Baird pointed out:

Defensive denial has long been, and remains, a hallmark of the church’s response to reports of abuse in their midst, and to evidence that the doctrine of headship – that men are the heads of women, and women are to submit to their authority – is weaponised regularly by abusers.

When Baird first started writing about Scripture-based domestic abuse six years ago she unleashed a tsunami of anger and denial. The rage that ensued “was palpable.” A theologian, Claire Smith, and a minister, Karl Faase, both quickly wrote articles saying this kind of abuse does not occur in the church – or only extremely rarely.

The aggression of the pushback was jaw-dropping – male commentators, priests, archbishops, pundits, all rounding up to say the church did not have a problem with abuse of women, and in fact the ABC was inventing it and conducting a war on Christianity. We were accused of being “illogical” and “hysterical”.

Then the clergy wives – infuriated by the denials – came in droves. As they spoke, plainly, painfully and courageously of being raped, controlled, attacked, and being told as Christian women they should submit, the blokes of the church got lost in a distracting sideshow about whether some flawed, decades-old American research showed that women in churches were safer. It still amazes me.

Last Wednesday the new Archbishop of Sydney, Kanishka Raffel, responded to the report on Twitter, saying:

All forms of domestic abuse are incompatible with scripture and Christian faith.

Simon Smart, Executive Director of the Centre for Public Christianity, said he was encouraged that the Anglican Church was taking intimate partner violence seriously.

It’s clear that domestic violence in its multiple forms is a major challenge for our society and the church is not immune from the problem – it may even be especially susceptible to it, given that perpetrators misuse Christian teaching for abusive purposes.

The Anglican church is the first church to step forward and look deeply into this issue, and that is a hopeful sign that it might be able to take steps to do something to protect vulnerable people – something churches should be in the business of doing.

The National Anglican Family Violence Research Report was conducted by researchers from Charles Sturt University, who surveyed more than 2,000 men and women aged over 18 in December 2019.

Asked: “Have you been in a violent relationship with any partner”, 22 percent of Anglicans said yes, compared with 15 per cent of the broader public. But, notably, when presented with specific examples of abuse, 44 per cent of Anglicans said they had been victims of domestic violence, compared with 38 per cent of the general population.

• Please report any typos/errors to [email protected]

If you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee – and boy, do I get through a LOT of coffee keeping this site active – please click the link below.

I’d love a cup of coffee

Previous Post

June 13, 2021

India adds one more deity to its 33 million – 'Corona Mata'

Next Post

June 15, 2021 Arcane law stops British PM from advising Queen on Church of England matters

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Archive My Atheism News Opinion Reviews Uncategorized

Select a Month December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 March 2007 April 2006 February 2006

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I smashed a clay jar in the Valley of Ben Hinnom to illustrate coming destruction. What did this dramatic act symbolize?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The end of idolatry Breaking the covenant The breaking of Jerusalem The captivity

Books by This Author Books by The Freethinker

See All Titles »