Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

The Freethinker

Home
Nonreligious
Christian Legal Centre loses yet another ‘persecution’ case

Christian Legal Centre loses yet another ‘persecution’ case

Last updated on: February 26, 2021 at 11:11 pm by Barry Duke

Christian Legal Centre loses yet another ‘persecution’ case 2021-02-26T23:11:35+02:00 Barry Duke

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A CHRISTIAN magistrate sacked for his opposition to same-sex adoption has lost an appeal against his dismissal. The judgment comes close on the heels of the CLC’s disastrous Seyi Omooba case.

Image via YouTube

The Court of Appeal ruled that it was lawful for a Richard Page, above, a non-executive NHS director and magistrate to be sacked for expressing in the media that children do best when raised by a mother and a father.

Page, 74, was suspended from the magistracy and removed from his role at an NHS Trust, after explaining on television that he had been discriminated against for his Christian beliefs on parenting while presiding over a same-sex adoption case.

Following a six-year legal battle against the decisions to remove him, Page now intends to appeal the ruling to the Supreme Court.

Naturally Andrea Minichiello Williams, Chief Executive of the Christian Legal Centre, is furious:

This is the first time the Court of Appeal has endorsed the perverse distinction between unlawful discrimination for Christian beliefs and lawfully dismissing someone for offending an LGBT audience by expressing those beliefs.

This is simply an artificial way to exclude Christian beliefs from the protection of the law. Nobody would get away with applying a similar distinction to any other protected characteristic. You would not get away with dismissing a homosexual for coming out as a homosexual, and then saying: ‘we duly respect your sexual orientation as long as you keep it to yourself’.

This is an unfair and chilling decision, and the Supreme Court should put it right.

She further wailed:

The judgment sends a direct message to Christian public servants that if they allow their beliefs to influence their decision-making while in public office, they must self-censor and be silent, and are ultimately unfit for that office. If they express their beliefs in private to colleagues, they will be reprimanded, and if they then state those beliefs to the media, they will be sacked and will have their lives torn apart.

The idea that you can remove a director from the NHS based on a perception that members of the LGBT community may be offended by something he said in the media, is extraordinary and should concern us all.

In his judgment on Page’s claim against NHS Improvement, Lord Justice Underhill stated that:

The extent to which it is legitimate to expect a person holding a senior role in a public body to refrain from expressing views which may upset a section of the public is a delicate question.

He recognised that Page:

Had a particular interest in expressing publicly his views about same-sex adoption in the context of his removal as a magistrate, which was a legitimate matter of public debate and that he expressed his views ‘temperately’ in the media.

However, he judged that Page’s views on same sex-marriage and “homosexual activity”, might cause “offence.”.

The ruling suggested, for example, that Page should have “declined to answer” Piers Morgan’s questions on his beliefs during an interview on Good Morning Britain in 2016.

However, it was ruled that Page’s responses to Morgan’s questions justified his removal from his financial role in the NHS, as they might inadvertently:

Deter mentally ill gay people in the Trust’s catchment area from engaging with its services.

Lawyers representing Page had argued at the hearing in November 2020 that upholding his removal on these grounds would force Christians holding traditional views about sexual morality into silence, making it almost impossible for them to hold any kind of public office.

Concluding his judgment Lord Justice Underhill stated, however, that:

The issue raised by this case is not about what beliefs such a person holds but about the limits on their public expression. The freedom to express religious or any other beliefs cannot be unlimited.

In particular, so far as the present case is concerned, there are circumstances in which it is right to expect Christians (and others) who work for an institution, especially if they hold a high-profile position, to accept some limitations on how they express in public their beliefs on matters of particular sensitivity.

• Please report any typos/errors to [email protected]

If you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee – and boy, do I get through a LOT of coffee keeping this site active – please click the link below.

I’d love a cup of coffee

News

Andrea Minichiello Williams

Christian Legal Centre

Homophobia

Richard Page

Previous Post

February 26, 2021

Christian bigots left fuming over the passing of Biden's Equality Act

Next Post

February 27, 2021 Republicans mocked over 'idolatrous' golden Trump statue

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Archive My Atheism News Opinion Reviews Uncategorized

Select a Month December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 March 2007 April 2006 February 2006

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did Jesus use to heal a blind man in John 9?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A fig leaf His robe Olive oil Mud and saliva

Books by This Author Books by The Freethinker

See All Titles »