Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

The Freethinker

Home
Nonreligious
Chocolate company horrifies Christians with a ‘sexually intimate’ ad

Chocolate company horrifies Christians with a ‘sexually intimate’ ad

Last updated on: February 19, 2021 at 6:13 pm by Barry Duke

Chocolate company horrifies Christians with a ‘sexually intimate’ ad 2021-02-19T18:13:26+02:00 Barry Duke

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Images via YouTube

THE last time I featured homophobic crackpot Caroline Farrow, inset, she was having conniptions about Disneyland organising an LGBT event in Paris.

Now she’s outraged that a commercial being run by multinational confectionery company Cadbury not only features two men sharing a Crème Egg, but are doing so during the ‘holy’ Easter period! The Catholic prodnose is now on a mission to have the ad banned, saying in a petition – so far signed by more than 24,000 bigoted halfwits – that:

For those of all faiths and none, the Cadbury’s Creme Egg has become a synonymous part of Easter celebrations in the United Kingdom. Cadbury’s know full-well that their product is enjoyed by children and deliberately market it at this demographic, making this campaign even more irresponsible. Cadbury’s is traditionally a brand associated with families.

Headed “Cadburys are selling sex to children” the petition adds:

Exposing children to sexualised content constitutes a form of grooming. It is well-known that children will often copy what they see on the screen. Cadburys are a well-established household name who deliberately market their products towards families and children; therefore, it is unacceptable that they should seek to expose children to an image which is so clearly hyper-sexualised.

It goes on:

By featuring a gay couple, Cadbury’s are aiming to escape criticism by using the cover of ‘inclusiveness’ and ‘diversity’. Still, this sexually graphic advertisement has no place being shown on mainstream media where children can view it. Such sexual objectification is against the ASA’s code of conduct.

According to Christian site Premier:

Some say the advert should not feature a gay couple in an Easter advert because it is offensive to Christians, others say the advert is too explicit, regardless of the sexual orientation of the couple. On the other hand, some people have pointed out that kissing is frequently used between straight couples with far less complaints.

It quoted Farrow, who has panic attacks when she sees rainbow symbols, as saying:

Cadbury’s should not be seeking to hide under cover of LGBT rights to conduct a campaign which sexually objectifies individuals.

If the couple in question were heterosexual, the advertisement would likely be prohibited, given the sexually explicit and graphic nature of the kiss. A kiss can take many forms; this is not a mere peck on the cheek or familial show of affection but rather two adults snogging, using their lips and tongues to exchange the contents of a creme egg in an extremely sexually suggestive fashion.

It is gross and off-putting, regardless of the sex of the participants and given the overtly sexual nature of the kiss, would likely to be banned or censured if the couple were straight.

Many evangelical and Catholic Christians, as well as those of other faiths are likely to be offended by the advert, which deliberately seeks to undermine biblical and traditional Christian teaching about sex and sexuality. It’s important that Christians are not rail-roaded into accepting the prevailing liberal orthodoxy and even more important that brands which seek to have broad appeal.

The advert is celebrating 50 years of the Crème Egg and features various people eating Crème Eggs in different ways. A real-life gay couple – Callum Sterling and Dale K Moran – are seen dancing in a garden, then kissing and sharing a Crème Egg, with the voice-over saying:

Sharers? Yeah, we are down with that.

Sterling replied to the criticism on Instagram:

So it’s OK when an advert sexualises a woman to benefit the male gaze and make other women feel inadequate if they do not live up to this beauty standard. But it’s not OK, in 2021, to have an advert of a multi-racial (strike one) gay couple (strike two) on your screens for 10 seconds (strike three) eating/kissing/sexualised (strike four). Does anyone see how ridiculous this is? Like actual LOL.

Cadbury gave Premier this statement:

Cadbury has always been a progressive brand that spreads a message of inclusion, whether it is through its products or brand campaigns. We are proud of our Golden Goobilee advert which celebrates the many ways that everyone can enjoy a Cadbury Creme Egg. To illustrate this and showcase the joy our products bring, a clip of a real life couple sharing a Cadbury Creme Egg was included in the advert.

Image via OneBodyOneFaith

Luke Dowding, Executive Director of OneBodyOneFaith, an LGBT+ inclusive Christian group, told Premier he was delighted there were more LGBT+ people being represented in the media and added:

I think for Christians, perhaps what should be of more concern is the commercialisation of Easter.

He suggested that Christians should be more concerned about:

Issues of how chocolate is grown, how farmers are supported, whether chocolate is fairly traded are perhaps bigger issues that Christians might want to focus on.

Speaking about the claim that the product is often bought by children but has an advert which is ‘sexually explicit’, Dowding said:

I’m not sure the sharing of chocolate or the expression of a kiss could be expressed as ‘sexually explicit’, regardless of the orientation of the couple but I agree that there is media out there that perhaps is inappropriate for the consumption of children … it’s really is down to the parents to decide what they want their children to watch or not watch.

Image via YouTube

Mike Davidson, above, a Christian charlatan who heads a quack “gay cure” outfit based in Northern Ireland – Core Issues Trust – told Premier this advert was not the biggest problem:

I think there’s a great deal that would have to be removed if we want to protect children. I can well understand the need to defend and protect Judeo-Christian values in society, I’m just not sure that Easter eggs is the place to do it. Is that really the place where we want to have an argument about what we want to project in terms of the values that are important to us?

A loopy organisation called One Million Moms – created by designated hate group the American Family Association – has stuck its nose into the row and its asking its supporters to boycott Cadbury’s Crème Egg, and act to prevent the advert reaching US TV. The group wrote:

You might not like how the company celebrates the risen Saviour.

Cadbury makes a huge push to sell its Crème Eggs in America during the Easter season each year. A portion of each sale goes to help finance Cadbury’s social agenda that has nothing to do with chocolates and candies. If U.S. sales are strong, Cadbury just might bring this ad to American televisions for your children to see.

Curiously, the websites of One Million Mom and the AFA have been inaccessible for months, which is a pity because their paranoid content provided bloody good a belly laughs.

• Please report any typos/errors to [email protected]

If you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee – and boy, do I get through a LOT of coffee keeping this site active – please click the link below.

I’d love a cup of coffee

The American Family Association

Previous Post

February 18, 2021

'Blasphemy expert' called to testify at Polish musician's trial

Next Post

February 20, 2021 Anti-abortion group slammed for spreading lies about vaccinations

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Archive My Atheism News Opinion Reviews Uncategorized

Select a Month December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 March 2007 April 2006 February 2006

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who wrote many of the Psalms?

Select your answer to see how you score.

David Paul Moses Solomon

Books by This Author Books by The Freethinker

See All Titles »