Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

The Freethinker

‘Pro-lifer’ lawyer says UK judges should ‘never do theology’

Last updated on: December 24, 2020 at 12:03 am   by Barry Duke

‘Pro-lifer’ lawyer says UK judges should ‘never do theology’ 2020-12-24T00:03:00+02:00 Barry Duke

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Image via YouTube

ROGER Kiska, above, a Canadian-Slovak lawyer who does work for the fanatical UK-based Christian Concern, has criticised a judge for not taking into account the Catholic beliefs of the family of a Polish man who is about to be taken off life life support because English doctors in the UK, where the man lives, believe that he will spend the rest of his life in a ‘minimally conscious’ state.

According to LifeSiteNews, the man’s wife agrees that he should be allowed to die, but his extended Catholic family in Poland want him kept alive.

The case, involving a patient identifed only P or RS, suffered severe brain damage after a heart attack at his home in England’s West Midlands in November.

Today (Wednesday), appeals court judges Lady Justice King and Lord Justice Peter Jackson accepted the view of a legal team for the University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust that it would be lawful to discontinue life-sustaining treatment for the man. According to a British “Quality of Life” assessment, his continued existence would not be “meaningful.”

However, the man’s extended family, including his mother and sister in Poland, and a sister and niece in England, object to his “state-sanctioned killing”, arguing that as a church-attending Roman Catholic who was opposed to both abortion and euthanasia, RS would not wish his life to end in this manner.

In a hearing held on December 15, Mr Justice Cohen sided with the NHS and RS’s wife and children, saying that removal of life support would be in RS’s “best interests.” Regarding the discrepancies between RS’s birth family’s statements about his Roman Catholic beliefs, and his wife’s belief that RS would not want to be kept alive in his current circumstances, Cohen decided that his wife knew him better than his birth family.

David Lock, QC, the solicitor for RS’s mother and birth family, argued, in his application for an appeal, that there had been a procedural error in that the patient’s beliefs were not sufficiently addressed. Lock stated that, had the hearing not been so rushed, the “tenets of the Catholic faith” would have been made clearer to the court.

Neither Lady Justice King nor Lord Justice Peter Jackson seemed sympathetic to this argument, especially as Lock did not state that there should have been expert testimony from an authority on Catholic teachings. Jackson said that Justice Cohen had acknowledged that the Catholic Church is in “favour of preserving life” and that Cohen had understood that.

Writing for LSN, Dorothy Cummings McLean said:

What is not clear from the application appeal is whether or not Cohen understood that the Catholic Church absolutely condemns the killing of vulnerable patients through the withdrawal of care leading to death by starvation and/or dehydration.

Lady Justice King, known for her role in the “state-sanctioned killing of Alfie Evans,” argued that RS was estranged from his birth family, a point which Lock contested. It is clear, however, that RS’s wife is estranged from her in-laws, for she has not spoken to RS’s mother since her marriage to RS 17 years ago.

McLean said:

King also seemed to argue that RS was not a faithful Catholic, having married a divorcee and was therefore not being able to receive Holy Communion. It was, however, pointed out during the application that RS habitually went to Mass once a month.

Meanwhile, according to the extended family’s testimony, repeated in Lord Justice Jackson’s decision, RS had been very compassionate towards ailing, elderly relations, opposed abortion and euthanasia, and that it was a matter of great pain to him that he had not been able to get an annulment and resume receiving Holy Communion.

In his judgment Lord Justice Jackson disagreed with all of Lock’s arguments that procedural errors had occurred and that a new hearing should be held. He also said that it had been shown to the court that RS had made personal decisions against the tenets of the Catholic faith, and so his wife’s private letter to the judge about their premarital relationship did not determine the decision.

Lady Justice King agreed with Jackson’s judgement and expressed condolences, first to RS’s wife and children, and then to his birth family. None of the family members were visible during the online session.

Kiska argues that that Lady Justice King’s remark’s doubting RS’s adherence to Catholic beliefs about end-of-life care, given his marriage to a divorcee, was:

A secular inference that was really inappropriate. My opinion is that judges should never do theology.

After the judgement, Lock stated that RS’s mother would like to travel to Britain from Poland to say good-bye to her son before his death and noted that this may take some time, given the current travel restrictions and quarantine. King acknowledged this wish, but made it clear that there was “no stay on the order.”

A court order forbids the publication of the names of RS and his family members. Recording the court session would have been a criminal offence.

• Please report any typos/errors to [email protected]

If you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee – and boy, do I get through a LOT of coffee keeping this site active – please click the link below.

I'd love a cup of coffeeI’d love a cup of coffee

News

Euthanasia

Medical decisions

Roger Kiska

Theology

Previous Post



December 23, 2020

'Papa Yule' brings joy to whites-only 'church' mired in a racism row

Next Post



December 24, 2020 Abuse victim says German nuns rented out children for sex


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Archive My Atheism News Opinion Reviews Uncategorized

Select a Month December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 March 2007 April 2006 February 2006


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did Job famously say in response to loss: "The Lord gave and..."?

Select your answer to see how you score.

I will run away May His name be praised The Lord has taken away I have nothing left

Books by This Author Books by The Freethinker

See All Titles »

Related posts from The Freethinker

Nonreligious

Gothic novelist Anne Rice, who quit being a...

The Freethinker

Nonreligious

Survey shows that US atheists are overwhelmingly pro-vax

The Freethinker

Nonreligious

Plumber gets $20,000 for finding money stashed in...

The Freethinker

Nonreligious

Virginia library's festive holiday display sparks a devil...

The Freethinker

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Nonreligious

Dethroning Jesus and Enthroning Yourself

Jesus Never Asked to Be Worshipped. He Asked to Be Understood. Christianity...

Why Most Christians are Really Paulians and Jobians

I Don't Care, But It Matters Let's get this out of the...

Essential Tips to Successfully Navigate the Selling Process

Selling a house can feel overwhelming, but it doesn’t have to be....

To Make Remote Work Effective, Think About Others

The COVID-19 pandemic forced many companies to rapidly transition to remote work....

Flexibility Is Key to Solving Problems of Tomorrow

The world of work is undergoing a dramatic transformation. The COVID-19 pandemic...

view all Nonreligious blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube