Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

The Freethinker

Home
Nonreligious
Oh my, ‘hostile-to-religion Humanists’ are set to hijack Welsh RE

Oh my, ‘hostile-to-religion Humanists’ are set to hijack Welsh RE

Last updated on: December 26, 2020 at 4:19 pm by Barry Duke

Oh my, ‘hostile-to-religion Humanists’ are set to hijack Welsh RE 2020-12-26T16:19:01+02:00 Barry Duke

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Image via YouTube

Humanists, ‘who actively oppose all religion,’ will be handed control over religious education in Welsh schools, according to Simon Calvert, above, the Christian Institute’s Deputy Director for Public Affairs – and this, he warned, will lead to ‘chaos.’

What set off Calvert’s hysterical rant about foxes being put in charge of the henhouse is the Welsh Government’s proposed new education Bill that will change the law on religious education to make it clear that humanism must be taught about equally alongside the major religions.

His attack on Humanism and the Welsh Bill follows approval voiced in July this year by Wales Humanists, which has long campaigned for a curriculum that treats religions and humanism equally. The group said it will make Wales “a world-leader in inclusive education.”

The Bill requires that teaching and learning in religious education – which will be renamed religion, values, and ethics (RVE) – must:

Reflect the fact that a range of non-religious philosophical convictions are held in Great Britain.

It also makes provision for “a committee of persons representing … non-religious philosophical convictions’ to join Standing Advisory Councils on RE (or SACREs), the bodies that oversee RE and the development of the syllabus at local authority level.

These changes are designed to clarify the law in line with the Human Rights Act, according to which religious and non-religious worldviews must be given equal treatment.

Humanists UK also pointed out that:

As well as clarifying that humanism should be fully included in RVE, the Bill also seeks to ensure that as many pupils as possible receive the subject in a pluralistic, non-partisan way.

All children in schools without a religious character will be taught objective RVE in line with the locally agreed syllabus, but parents whose children attend voluntary aided faith schools – and who have previously been forced to choose between indoctrinatory faith-based RE and opting out altogether – will now be given the right to demand lessons taught in accordance with their locally agreed syllabus too.

Image via YouTube

Humanists UK Education Campaigns Manager Dr Ruth Wareham, above, commented:

We are delighted that the Welsh Government’s Curriculum and Assessment Bill has now been laid before the Senedd. If successful in becoming law, this Bill will make Wales a world-leader in inclusive education by implementing policy changes we have been working towards for decades.

We are aware that the Catholic Education Service is lobbying against these urgently required reforms. It is therefore imperative that as many members of the Senedd as possible support this Bill in order to make these important proposals a reality.

Christian Concern, on the other, hand sees the Bill as a full-on attack on religion, saying it will scrap:

Existing safeguards with nothing offered in their place and will imposes a compulsory ‘Relationships and Sexuality Education’ curriculum on all pupils from the age of three.

It will also replace RE with the new ‘Religion, Values and Ethics’ (RVE) subject, which requires all pupils to study atheism or ‘non-religious’ views, such as Humanism.

Calvert said:

Members of the Senedd are being asked to vote blind for a sex education curriculum they haven’t seen, whilst stripping away protections that took decades to achieve.

Image courtesy of the Liberal Democrat Party

He said he had “no idea” why Education Secretary Kirsty Williams, above, would want to abolish the safeguards, as it leaves sex education:

Wide open to the risk that some teachers could opt for unsuitable materials that would not have been allowed under the previous law.

He added:

Sex education groups have a long track record of pushing unsuitable materials on schools. Teachers are under huge time pressure and few specialise in sex ed, so they could be dependent on these outside agencies for materials.

Currently, individual primary schools can decide whether to provide sex education. It must be provided in secondary schools, but parents have a right to withdraw their children. This is an important backstop against unsuitable teaching, since schools will not want to do anything that triggers parents withdrawing children. But this right is being abolished, despite overwhelming public support for it in Government consultations.

Under the new system for RVE, a non-religious committee in each area is given a veto power over all religious teaching.

This means humanists, who actively oppose all religion, will be handed control over religious teaching in schools

Calvert continued:

The equally sensitive issue of Religious Education is being blown wide open. Pupils will face compulsory atheism lessons with no right of withdrawal and no limit on how much ‘Religious Education’ will actually be given over to anti-religious ideologies.

With the rearrangement of the system for agreeing the RE syllabus, groups like Humanists UK, whose stated goal as recently as 2011 was to rid society of religion, are being given a veto on the content of RE. This is ridiculous.

Parents are not going to like being side-lined from their children’s education on sex and religion – the two most controversial subjects you could imagine. And schools are not going to like being forced to teach controversial material that they, or the families they serve, disagree with. It could cause chaos.

Humanists UK’s aim to “rid society of religion” is a figment of Calvert’s deranged imagination. On the issue of constitutional reform, Humanists UK says:

We want the UK to become a secular state, guaranteeing equal treatment for everyone, regardless of religion or belief. This means creating a level playing field for everyone, and so we campaign to see the Church of England and Church of Scotland disestablished, and the inequalities associated with having an established religion removed.

This includes removing the 26 bishops who sit as of right in the House of Lords, with appointments or elections to the chamber instead being done for secular reasons.

In an examination of Humanism, the BBC quoted the International Humanist and Ethical Union (now Humanists International) as saying that Humanism:

Is a democratic and ethical life stance, which affirms that human beings have the right and responsibility to give meaning and shape to their own lives.

It stands for the building of a more humane society through an ethic based on human and other natural values in the spirit of reason and free inquiry through human capabilities.
It is not theistic, and it does not accept supernatural views of reality.

If that’s “ridding society of religion,” then bring it on, I say. The sooner the better!

• Please report any typos/errors to [email protected]

If you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee – and boy, do I get through a LOT of coffee keeping this site active – please click the link below.

I’d love a cup of coffee

Previous Post

December 25, 2020

America's top Jewish Santa defies Judaic law

Next Post

December 27, 2020 Priestly punch-up: Bishop bashed in a seminary closure row

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Archive My Atheism News Opinion Reviews Uncategorized

Select a Month December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 March 2007 April 2006 February 2006

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which chapter of Genesis recounts the genealogy from Adam to Noah?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Genesis 5 Genesis 10 Genesis 2 Genesis 7

Books by This Author Books by The Freethinker

See All Titles »