Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

The Freethinker

Home
Nonreligious
Op-ed: All the absolutes

Op-ed: All the absolutes

Last updated on: October 28, 2020 at 4:56 pm by Ophelia Benson

Op-ed: All the absolutes 2020-10-28T16:56:44+02:00 Ophelia Benson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Image via YouTube

I READ a piece by Fintan O’Toole about the US Attorney General William Barr, above, in the New York Review of Books this morning that got me thinking about the love of authoritarianism that brightens the lives of so many men.

Barr is a Catholic of the authoritarian type, but I suspect he’s even more of an authoritarian than he is a Catholic, rather than the other way around. There’s a lot wrong with religion, but it may be this cloaking of patriarchal dominance that’s the worst.

O’Toole writes:

There is, however, a very strong connection between Donald Barr’s hard-line Catholicism and [his son] William Barr’s present position as the main (perhaps the sole) intellectual buttress of Trump’s presidency. That connection lies in the idea of authority.

Authoritarian rule is a defining feature of hierarchical institutional Catholicism. The magisterium of the church flows from the pope, who, on matters of faith and morals, may create doctrines that are infallible and therefore unquestionable. These include the bans on contraception, divorce, abortion, homosexual sex, and same-sex marriage.

Ludicrous, isn’t it. Who is the pope? Just another guy, another priest, elected by priests to be the top priest. It’s not “God” who does the electing, it’s just these fellas. At what step, do you suppose, does the magic happen that makes this guy chosen by other guys “infallible”? At which point does the god step in and sprinkle the magic dust or plunk the magic twanger that turns a regular human guy into The Infallible Pope?

(There’s a certain similarity to the magic of royalty here. There are religious utterances and enrobings and gestures during the coronation ceremony that, we are given to understand, change a regular person into that magical thing, a Monarch. We don’t know exactly how they work, but we know they require the participation of the Archbishop of Canterbury, so there you go.)

So anyway the magic happens, in a manner that passeth human understanding, and after that the pope becomes [cue trumpets] INFALLIBLE. Nice work if you can get it. Thanks to the magic, this former just-another-guy gets to tell an estimated 1.2 billion people that women have no rights over their own bodies. It seems that Barr likes that kind of magic, and that kind of power to deprive people of rights.

William Barr is very much part of that nexus of American conservatives who date what he calls ‘the steady erosion of our traditional Judeo-Christian moral system’ to the loss of discipline in the 1960s under the pressure of all the challenges to authority that culminated so dramatically (and, for them, so traumatically) in Nixon’s departure.

It’s funny or tragic or both if Barr really thinks he’s propping up any kind of moral system by regretting Nixon’s departure and doing everything he can to make sure Donald Trump doesn’t depart. What is the use of a form of authority that places a corrupt, stupid, cruel, self-dealing, destructive real estate hustler at the top of the power pyramid? What good does it do?

It puts the pope in charge, that’s what good it does. Never mind Donald Trump, he’s merely the instrument by which this blessed death-grip of the Catholic Church will be imposed and maintained.

As a devout Catholic with links to the powerful Opus Dei movement, which galvanized the successful reaction against the liberalizing currents within the church, Barr holds to these principles as both articles of religious faith and bulwarks of the social order. In this, he is a central figure in the ever-growing influence of right-wing Catholicism under Trump, demonstrated yet again in his nomination of [Amy Coney] Barrett to the Supreme Court.

It’s all about authority and obedience. Never mind what good the rules are that you have to obey; don’t think about it, just obey. It’s authority for the sake of authority; obedience for the sake of obedience; rules for the sake of telling people what to do.

Barr’s understanding of executive authority is no more a matter of constitutional reasoning than a zealous Catholic’s acceptance of papal infallibility is a result of cool biblical analysis. It is a matter of faith.

And faith is…faith. It’s not about reasons, it’s not about explanation, it’s not about choosing between good and bad. It’s just faith. Just believe; just trust me; just obey.

What matters is what the president believes. If he has faith in his own authority, the job of his lawyers is not to question that faith but to defend it.

This is what makes Barr the perfect enabler of authoritarianism. The law, in his eyes, does not constrain the president’s will but rather serves it.

All is arbitrary. There is power, and there is obedience; that’s all there is to it.

Barr’s core belief, shared by Vice President Mike Pence and by the wider evangelical brand of religious authoritarianism, is that the entire American polity is possible only if its citizens are not just religious believers but believers in an absolutist “transcendent moral order which flows from God’s eternal law.”

And how do these believers know there is such a transcendent moral order? And that it flows from something called “God’s eternal law”? And that the priests and cardinals and popes who tell them so have it right and are not lying? And that none of the priests and cardinals and popes who preceded the current ones got it wrong or lied about it? How do they know their transcendent moral order is better than other transcendent moral orders?

Because Bill Barr says so, I guess.

Editor’s note: The issue of papal infallibility is dealt with at some length here. It makes for fascinating reading. This extract seized my attention:

The Knights of Columbus, the largest organization of Catholic laity in the world, was founded soon after the dogma of infallibility was adopted (1882) by a priest in New Haven, Connecticut. The mission: protect the faith. By 1914, the Knights had evolved into a national organization with considerable capability to intimidate those who spoke out against the Church regardless of whether the criticisms were justified.

They created the Commission on Religious Prejudices, chaired by Patrick Henry Callahan, to shut down the press criticism of the Church. According to their 1915 report, the Commission sponsored an education campaign by “informing and correcting editors and journalists who allowed religious prejudices to surface in their newspapers.” Callahan pointed out that between August 1914 and January 1917, the number of publications which published material critical of the Church dropped nationwide from 60 to two or three.

William Barr, according to the National Catholic Reporter, is a prominent member of the Knights of Columbus:

As part of his Senate confirmation hearing to become Trump’s Attorney General, Barr listed associations with several organizations that play a key role in advancing issues central to the conservative Christian movement, including the Knights of Columbus. A member since 1984, he has provided legal counsel to the Knights on tax exemptions. For three years in the 1990s, Barr noted on the Senate confirmation forms, he was a “Supreme Board Member” of the Knights.

Previous Post

October 26, 2020

Churches targeted in protests against Poland's near ban of abortion

Next Post

October 28, 2020 'Holy Spirit' tells pastor to break COVID-19 rules in his Welsh church

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Archive My Atheism News Opinion Reviews Uncategorized

Select a Month December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 March 2007 April 2006 February 2006

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does Paul say we see now as in a mirror dimly, but will one day see face to face?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Christ Heaven Knowledge God

Books by This Author Books by The Freethinker

See All Titles »