Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

The Freethinker

Home
Nonreligious
Communion cups kerfuffle: legal eagles enter the fray

Communion cups kerfuffle: legal eagles enter the fray

Last updated on: August 17, 2020 at 2:50 pm by Barry Duke

Communion cups kerfuffle: legal eagles enter the fray 2020-08-17T14:50:17+02:00 Barry Duke

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Image via the Prayer Book Society/YouTube

WHEN a group of top UK lawyers are asked for their opinion on – of all things – communion cups, you can only shake your head in disbelief.

This tale has its beginning in March when the Archbishops of Canterbury and York said churches should not use a single shared cup – or chalice – for communion wine because of the risk of transmitting Covid-19. Which makes perfect sense.

But then, at July’s Church of England General Synod, Mary Durlacher, an evangelical lay member , suggested the use of individual cups for wine was a “valid, common sense, pro tem” way forward.

Things then started to get ugly.

Image via YouTube

Her suggestion was dismissed as “illegal” by the Bishop of London Sarah Mullally, above. She said that the church’s Legal Advisory Commission believed it was:

Contrary to law for individual cups to be used for each communicant.

The bishop cited an obscure 16th century law, the 1547 Sacrament Act, which concerns those who:

Unreverentlie speake against the Sacrament of the bodie and bloude of Christe.

Durlacher was not going to be brushed off that easily. So she invited the legal eagles to give their opinion. According to Christian Today, the six leading QCs and barristers said in a statement last week they believe that individual chalices are lawful

The “hard-hitting” legal opinion by the lawyers said:

The House of Bishops’ present position – that the use of individual cups for distributing communion is illegal – is incorrect as a matter of law. There is no legal barrier to the use of individual cups.

They added:

In our opinion, there is no bar in the Sacrament Act 1547 to the use of individual cups when distributing communion in both kinds, and neither the Canons of the Church of England nor the rubrics of the Book of Common Prayer contain or impose any prohibition.

Consequently, there are no grounds for concluding that the use of individual cups at communion is contrary to the law. The conclusion that individual cups are legal is a conclusion which is reached, as a matter of law, independent of the present public health emergency. They were legal before the first case of Covid-19, they are currently legal, and they will continue to be legal when the pandemic is over.

The opinion was delivered by Stephen Hofmeyr QC, Mark Cawson QC, Andrew Wales QC, Carolyn Johnson, Carl Fender and Jonathan Schaffer-Goddard.

Ultimately, it is for a court of law to pronounce on whether a particular view of the law is correct or not, so this legal opinion does not necessarily mean churches have a clear green light to go ahead and use individual cups, unless an official legal verdict is reached.

The lawyers say the opinion of the church’s Legal Advisory Commission (LAC) given at Synod:

Does not accurately reflect the law and therefore the position taken by the House of Bishops is based on an incorrect foundation. We believe that there is no legal barrier to the use of individual cups and that, by the use of individual cups, the distribution of communion in both kinds is lawful.

They said that the LAC view is:

A complete misreading of the Act … There is no prohibition in the Act on the use of individual cups to distribute communion because the Act is entirely silent on the question of the methods for delivering and ministering communion. It is simply not concerned with the matter. Therefore, unless there is some prohibition elsewhere in either the common law or canon law, there can be no basis for saying that there is a legal bar to the use of individual cups to distribute communion.

And in a challenging aside, they said that if individual communion cups are unlawful, then separate communion wafers – rather than one shared loaf of bread – might well be too:

The question that arises… is, on what basis might individual cups be said to be unlawful that would not equally apply to individual wafers?

Leading Anglican theologian Dr Andrew Goddard had already described the bishops’ ban on communion cups as:

Legally dubious … biblically baseless, theologically erroneous, and likely to prove pastorally damaging.

• Please report any typos/errors to [email protected]

If you’d like to buy me a cup of coffee – and boy, do I get through a LOT of coffee keeping this site active – please click the link below

Previous Post

August 15, 2020

Missionaries declared 'essential workers' by Brazil's Bolsonaro

Next Post

August 17, 2020 Trump's 'Yo-semite' gaffe is now a rallying call for pro-Biden Jews

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Archive My Atheism News Opinion Reviews Uncategorized

Select a Month December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 March 2007 April 2006 February 2006

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How did the apostles choose Matthias to replace Judas?

Select your answer to see how you score.

By Vote Peter appointed him They cast lots By the Holy Spirit

Books by This Author Books by The Freethinker

See All Titles »