Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
In Politics, Shouldn’t “Adult Conversations” be a Given?

In Politics, Shouldn’t “Adult Conversations” be a Given?

Last updated on: February 19, 2015 at 3:45 pm by Russell Shaw

In Politics, Shouldn’t “Adult Conversations” be a Given? 2015-02-19T15:45:46-05:00 Russell Shaw

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

American Spirit / Shutterstock.com

By Russell Shaw

I try to take American politics seriously, I really do. Serious issues are at stake, after all. But sometimes, entirely too often in fact, the realities of American political discourse make taking it seriously awfully hard. Considering the seriousness of what’s at stake, this may be what hearing Beethoven’s Ninth performed on the harmonica would be like.

A while back Jeb Bush, speaking to a group in San Francisco, promised that if he runs for president next year, he will offer the country “adult conversations” regarding the problems it faces. Whether he does that or not is, for the moment, beside the point. The point now is that Bush got headlines for saying something that should be taken for granted of candidates for high office. But apparently it’s news simply to say you’ll speak to the American people as if they were grownups.

Recently I was asked to give a talk on sobriety. The details needn’t detain us here, although this wasn’t a temperance lecture or even particularly about the use of alcohol (although that was part of it). It was about sobriety in the sense of moderation, self-control, and — especially — seriousness.

As one example of an area where there’s a sobriety deficit, I cited politics. Here, roughly, is what I said:

“Very often, I’m afraid, you find this lack of sobriety and seriousness in political campaigns. It’s not just that they’ve become ridiculously expensive, although that’s part of the problem, but that they also are in some fundamental way frivolous and unserious.

“For instance, and without drawing partisan political conclusions, I have the impression that Mitt Romney and Barack Obama are both essentially serious men. That being so, my heart went out to them both during the presidential campaign of 2012 in view of all the stupid, fatuous things they were required, or felt required, to say and do. I could say the same of many other candidates for office these days.

“Of course, maybe it’s always been that way. Maybe the level of political discourse in America has always been embarrassingly low. Still, I have the impression that lately it’s gotten worse.

“It didn’t happen all at once, but the turning point in this process may have been the time Bill Clinton was asked — and answered — a question about his underwear. Somehow I can’t imagine George Washington or Abraham Lincoln discussing his underwear in public. There are several problems with this, and the conspicuous lack of sobriety isn’t the least of them.”

I’m not suggesting that politicians must be sober-sided and dull, but I am suggesting that when they talk about serious matters, they do it in a serious way.

If they can combine seriousness with wit, all the better.

But what we generally get instead are image-mongering, sound bites, and slogans — all of them carefully pretested in the same way that manufacturers of everything from breakfast cereal to automobiles pretest the advertising for new products and new models.

What I’d like especially to see is — to borrow Jeb Bush’s phrase — adult conversations regarding the moral dimension of public issues. Granted, the risk in debating morality is a lapse into moralism that ignores the real moral complexity of many policy issues.

But the risk of not debating right and wrong is the encouragement thus given to a debased pragmatism that amounts to saying, “Do what you need to do in order to get the results you want.” Which is, I fear, about where we are now, and it’s not a good place to be.

Russell Shaw is a freelance writer based in Washington, D.C., and the author of twenty books, including American Church: The Remarkable Rise, Meteoric Fall, and Uncertain Future of Catholicism in America is available on Kindle. You can email him at [email protected].

Previous Post

February 4, 2015

A Community of Buoyant Friendship Amid Gathering Clouds

Next Post

February 19, 2015 Same Sex Marriage Inevitable; Churches Must Seek Legal Protections

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion abuse art and culture Books Catholic and Gay Catholic identity Catholic Laity Catholic Vocations Catholic Youth Catholicity Cinema clergy scandal Community of Sant’Egidio Culture of Life Editorial Faith Family Father Robert Barron Guest Post In Defense of Christians Marriage Mary Middle East New Evangelization Parenthood Patheos Catholic Poetry politics Pope Poverty Prayer Priesthood Race in America Sacred Art Saints Series sexuality Shaw Synod Uncategorized

Select a Month August 2023 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 October 2020 August 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 November 2019 June 2019 May 2019 March 2019 December 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2017 July 2017 October 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many days was Jesus in the tomb before His resurrection?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Forty Seven Nine Three