Great Society to Obama: Government Effect on Family Size

Last updated on: February 19, 2015 at 3:47 pm by Russell Shaw

Great Society to Obama: Government Effect on Family Size 2015-02-19T15:47:14-05:00 Russell Shaw

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

By Russell Shaw

President Lyndon Baines Johnson had spoken the words “Great Society” before, but on January 4, 1965 he brought the pieces together as a legislative package for Congress. His State of the Union message stirred a remarkable flurry of congressional activity that in short order produced major new programs in civil rights, health care, and anti-poverty.

In the half-century since then, the Great Society and its offspring have made profound changes in American society. A huge increase in government-sponsored family planning at home and abroad is one of these. Fifty years later, it’s worth considering how Church leadership responded at the start, not just as a history lesson but for the light it sheds on the Church’s response the growing federal embrace now of things like abortion and same-sex marriage.

My principal source is a book called Intended Consequences: Birth Control, Abortion, and the Federal Government by historian Donald T. Critchlow. The heavily-documented volume, published in 1999 by Oxford University Press, has information otherwise not readily available on crucial events in the not so distant Catholic past.

Pressure for government birth control was rising before LBJ. Although President Dwight Eisenhower had famously remarked that he could think of nothing less appropriate for government involvement than family planning, private conversations on the matter took place during the Kennedy administration.

Meanwhile the population lobby labored to win Catholic support. An important part of this effort was a series of conferences from 1963 to 1967 at Notre Dame University, with the Ford and Rockefeller foundations paying and attendance by foundation people, population groups and Church organizations. Critchlow writes: “Both sides knew what they wanted: a liberal forum to create an oppositional voice within the Catholic Church on the issue of family planning.”

Johnson came to the presidency determined to make birth control an integral part of his War on Poverty. Congress agreed. But LBJ, canny politician that he was, feared a Catholic backlash if he moved too fast on the domestic front and therefore stressed family planning to fight the much-ballyhooed “population explosion” abroad. Quiet expansion of existing welfare and health programs was to be the tactic at home.

Two administration Catholics — presidential aide Joseph Califano and Office of Economic Opportunity director Sargent Shriver — were given the job of cultivating the Catholic hierarchy, especially its Washington-based organization the National Catholic Welfare Conference, predecessor of today’s U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.

A key moment occurred in early 1966 when the Department of Health, Education and Welfare (now Health and Human Services) for the first time issued guidelines for family planning grants to the states. The NCWC administrative board responded with a statement protesting “threats to free choice of spouses.” But an NCWC official privately assured Califano this was only “the last trumpet of the older American bishops.”

The White House then concluded that non-coercive family planning was acceptable to the hierarchy. The following year brought expanded support for birth control abroad, along with Social Security amendments for the first time authorizing grants to private groups like Planned Parenthood — a breakthrough long sought by the population lobby.

By the time Johnson announced he wouldn’t seek reelection in 1968, federal funding of family planning was in the multi-millions and rising fast. And the bishops, Critchlow writes, had “tacitly” agreed to accept federal birth control, provided only it was “noncoercive.” It’s unlikely they could have prevented what happened — public opinion, including Catholic opinion, was against them — but they might have gotten a better deal. Is there a lesson here today as Obamacare-funded abortion grows?

Image courtesy of Shutterstock.com

Russell Shaw is a freelance writer based in Washington, D.C., and the author of twenty books, including American Church: The Remarkable Rise, Meteoric Fall, and Uncertain Future of Catholicism in America is available on Kindle. You can email him at [email protected].

Previous Post

January 6, 2015

Francis' New Cardinals Not Reaching Every Frontier

Next Post

January 12, 2015 Fr. Barron: Religion's "Smart-People Problem" a View Rooted in Ignorance

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion abuse art and culture Books Catholic and Gay Catholic identity Catholic Laity Catholic Vocations Catholic Youth Catholicity Cinema clergy scandal Community of Sant’Egidio Culture of Life Editorial Faith Family Father Robert Barron Guest Post In Defense of Christians Marriage Mary Middle East New Evangelization Parenthood Patheos Catholic Poetry politics Pope Poverty Prayer Priesthood Race in America Sacred Art Saints Series sexuality Shaw Synod Uncategorized

Select a Month August 2023 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 October 2020 August 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 November 2019 June 2019 May 2019 March 2019 December 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2017 July 2017 October 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 December 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What type of building was Jesus born in?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A castle A cave A stable A tent