GODSTUFF: Stuff we don’t want, stuff they don’t need?

Last updated on: February 18, 2011 at 12:07 pm by Cathleen Falsani

GODSTUFF: Stuff we don’t want, stuff they don’t need? 2011-02-18T12:07:41-07:00 Cathleen Falsani

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

On a recent family trip to Africa, spotting locals wearing T-shirts and baseball caps bearing obvious American brands or slogans became something of a parlor game — a way to pass long hours in the Land Rover driving from place to place, when we weren’t counting goats or looking for zebras.

There was a rural farmer in a Redskins cap. A young woman, hips wrapped in a traditional cloth chitenge paired with a white T-shirt bearing the campaign slogan of an Indiana candidate for city council. A man walking along a dusty road clad in a faded blue T-shirt that read: Cubs Suck.

The American sartorial influence on display in the African communities we visited seemed comically incongruous and we wondered aloud where the clothes came from.

Were they gifts sent by a U.S. charity? Was this the ultimate destination for old T-shirts and hats donated to Midwestern clothing drives? Or did the Africans wearing them choose them from the small mountains of clothing — some of it new, most of it used — piled on tables and tarps at every market we visited along our journey?

In the parlance of foreign assistance, such donated clothing and other items is known as SWEDOW, which roughly translates to Stuff We Don’t Want. The latest SWEDOW dump came in the form of a massive donation from the NFL to the behemoth Christian relief group World Vision.

After the Pittsburgh Steelers lost the Super Bowl to the Green Bay Packers, the NFL was stuck with thousands of pre-printed T-shirts heralding the Steelers as Super Bowl champs. The league donated them to World Vision, which in turn plans to ship them to poor folks in Armenia, Nicaragua, Romania and the African nation of Zambia.

World Vision is one of the world’s largest relief organizations, with nearly 400 projects serving nearly 100 million people in 100 countries around the globe. Founded in 1950, World Vision sees its mission as “working with children, families, and their communities worldwide to reach their full potential by tackling the causes of poverty and injustice,” according to its website.

While it is an evangelical organization, World Vision “serves all people, regardless of religion” with an annual operating budget somewhere in the neighborhood of $1.5 billion.

Some critics called a foul on the NFL/World Vision play, saying that while 100,000 brand new T-shirts to needy people abroad sounds like a lovely idea, it actually does more harm than good.

The NFL has valued the shirts at $20 apiece, despite claims from critics that the shirts are basically unsellable and therefore essentially worthless. As a rule, World Vision does not accept donations of used clothing or other items.

“Shipping unwanted goods overseas is … not smart aid,” longtime non-profit activist Saundra Schimmelpfennig wrote on her blog, Good Intentions Are Not Enough.

“This partnership is a win-win for both World Vision and the merchandizers. The merchandizers get to print 100,000 unneeded T-shirts every year without having to shoulder the full cost, and World Vision gets $2,000,000 worth of ‘program costs’ to improve their expense ratios. And they both get free PR with photos and news stories of happy people receiving the unsellable T-shirts.”

Schimmelpfennig and other critics claim that T-shirts are readily available in most of the countries World Vision and other relief organizations serve. The NFL donation will flood local marketplaces with unneeded (and unwanted, at least by U.S. consumers) goods, driving down the prices at which local merchants can viably sell their wares.

The donation of 100,000 Super Bowl T-shirts is known in the foreign aid “industry” as Gifts in Kind. According to its 2010 annual financial report, last year World Vision received about $251 million in GIK — about a quarter of its total annual revenue — compared to $528 million in private donations and $241 million in government grants.

World Vision’s response to criticism of this year’s Super Bowl T-shirt donation has been thoughtful.

“I would hate for our stance to be seen as one of ‘Don’t pick on us because we’re an easy target,'” Jeffery Wright, Operations Director for Humanitarian & Emergency Affairs for World Vision U.S., said by phone Wednesday evening.

“We need to take this seriously … [They] are raising good points. We do need to be using all of the resources at our disposal to do the best possible aid we can do.

“Will we change our GIK practices immediately? … I can’t promise that. But I can promise that we absolutely will take it seriously,” he said.

The GIK issue is bigger than just World Vision. Accepting such gifts is standard practice throughout the foreign aid community and there are other organizations that accept GIK in far greater proportions than World Vision does, Wright said.

The NFL/World Vision flap is a teachable moment both for the relief industry and for U.S. donors who often write a check or donate a box of clothing without giving a second thought to where, how and who will benefit from their generosity.

Even when we’re trying to do good, there is always room for improvement.

GODSTUFF

Previous Post

February 15, 2011

GODSTUFF: Living Leviticus ~ Who could do it? Who would want to?

Next Post

March 1, 2011 GODSTUFF: Homosexuality on Christian college campus

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category A little happy ARCHIVED COLUMNS BECOMING FAMILY BelieberNess BREAKING NEWS! Disquiet Time DJ JEFF'S SPINTASMS falsani FILM from OCRegister From Sojo.net God Nods GODSTUFF I Take Requests incubatespirit LURKING IN THE NARTHEX On My Nightstand ONEMOMS Polling the Room PONTIFEXCELLENT Thru My Eyes TWO CENTS Uncategorized Upcoming Events VASCO VASCO'S HEART

Select a Month January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 July 2014 May 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 April 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 October 2003 March 2003 December 2002 October 2002 January 2001

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How did Saul die?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Killed by Philistines Stoned by Israelites Fell on his own sword Died of old age