BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian
Beliefs
- Buddhist
- Catholic
- Contemplative
- Evangelical
- General Christian
- Hindu
- Jewish
- Latter-day Saint
- More Voices
- Muslim
- New Visions
- Pagan
- Progressive Christian
Topics
- Religion News
- Food and Religion
- Sports and Religion
- Religious Art
- Religious Music and Entertainment
- Religious Events
- History and Religion
- Style and Religion
- Politics and Religion
- Women in Religion
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion
- Business Finance and Religion
- Careers Workplace and Religion
- Education and Religion
- Family Parenting and Religion
- Health Fitness and Religion
- Home and Religion
- Relationships and Religion
- Technology and Religion
- Travel and Religion
Columnists
- Buddhist Columnists
- Business Finance and Religion Columnists
- Careers Workplace and Religion Columnists
- Catholic Columnists
- Contemplative Columnists
- Education and Religion Columnists
- Evangelists Columnists
- Family Parenting and Religion Columnists
- General Christian Columnists
- Health Fitness and Religion Columnists
- Hindu Columnists
- History and Religion Columnists
- Home and Religion Columnists
- Jewish Columnists
- More Voices Columnists
- Latter Day Columnists
- Muslim Columnists
- New Visions Columnists
- Nonreligious Columnists
- Pagan Columnists
- Politics and Religion Columnists
- Progressive Columnists
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion Columnists
- Relationships and Religion Columnists
- Religion News Columnists
- Religious Art Columnists
- Religious Events Columnists
- Religious Music and Entertainment Columnists
- Sports and Religion Columnists
- Style and Religion Columnists
- Technology and Religion Columnists
- Travel and Religion Columnists
- Women in Religion Columnists
Resource Library
- 2026 Calendar
- Library of World Religions
- The 100 Most Holy Places on Earth
- Patheos Answers
- Podcasts
- Videos
- Faith Leaders Database
- Anglican Episcopalian
- Bahai
- Baptist
- Buddhism
- Christianity
- Confucianism
- Eastern Orthodoxy
- Hinduism
- Holiness and Pentecostal
- ISKCON
- Islam
- Judaism
- Lutheran
- Methodist
- The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
- New Age
- Paganism
- Presbytarian and Reformed
- Protestantism
- Religion Behind the Scenes
- Roman Catholic
- Scientology
- Shia Islam
- Sikhism
- Sufism
- Sunni Islam
- Taoism
- Zen
- See all religions
Research Tools
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- Trending:
- Forgiveness
- |
- Marriage
- |
- Consciousness
- |
- Death Penalty
- |
- Election
- |
- Halloween
The Dude Abides
- Home
- Contact
- GG's Books
- God Girl's Bio
- Attend Cathleen's Workshops
- Buy Disquiet Time
- Obama on faith: The exclusive interview
- Public Appearances
- Archive Index
- Home
- Progressive Christian
- GODSTUFF: MTV overestimates our appetite for flesh with “Skins”
GODSTUFF: MTV overestimates our appetite for flesh with “Skins”
Last updated on: January 26, 2011 at 5:19 pm by Cathleen Falsani
GODSTUFF: MTV overestimates our appetite for flesh with “Skins” 2011-01-26T17:19:12-07:00 Cathleen Falsani
Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.
Earlier this month, the Parents Television Council asked the U.S. Justice Department to investigate whether Skins, an MTV remake of an award-winning British drama about high school kids, constitutes child pornography for its use of underage actors in highly sexualized scenarios.
I’m no fan of censorship, and the PTC historically has veered into histrionic territory with its protestations of shows such as That 70’s Show, Will and Grace and Dawson’s Creek.
Yet when it comes to MTV’s Skins, I reluctantly concur.
MTV’s version of Skins is, in my humble, vaguely nauseated opinion, repellent — but not for the same reasons as the PTC and several advertisers, such as Taco Bell (which pulled its ads from the show), have judged it similarly.
Is it child pornography? If you seriously need to ask that question, the show is probably not ready for public consumption.
There is great debate about the definition of “pornography,” exemplified famously by the 1964 US Supreme Court obscenity case Jacobellis v. Ohio in which Justice Potter Stewart (in an attempt to define “hard-core pornography”) said: “I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material. . . [b]ut I know it when I see it.”
One dictionary defines “porn” as “creative activity, such as writing or pictures or films, etc., of no literary or artistic value other than to stimulate sexual desire.” Viewed through that lens, MTV’s Skins is dancing (in a pair of Chuck Taylor high tops and a painfully tight jeans) dangerously close to the line.
Unlike the provocative and sympathetic characters in its U.K. forerunner, the protagonists of MTV’s Skins are tweely one-dimensional — presented as if the most compelling part of their humanity is their fumbling sexuality. The UK’s Skins featured complex, multifaceted characters, dialogue and story lines that rang authentic, exploring (with more than a passing glance) issues of mental health, family dysfunction, alienation, identity (sexual and otherwise) and even faith.
MTV’s Skins is neither authentically sexy nor remotely soulful. Sex scenes are shot with fractured, breathy imagery — a wandering hand or a craning neck here, open mouths and the small of a back over there. There’s plenty of panting, groping and writhing, but the complete bodies — and the complete personhoods — of the characters are envisaged with the eye of an amateur cubist.
As the parent of an 11-year-old being reared in Laguna Beach (yes, that Laguna Beach, the Southern California town featured in the eponymous faux-documentary scourge that birthed the genre at MTV), it’s not so much dangerous as it is deeply depressing.
Spiritually depressing, more specifically.
Rather than titillate or horrify, MTV’s Skins elicits a certain acedia — a lingering spiritual listlessness or torpor that the ancients counted among the Seven Deadly Sins. But, it’s not what the young characters are doing — a lot of sex and drugs and laconic drifting — that is the most unsettling.
The truth is that most American teenagers at least dabble with in the same activities as the kids on Skins. Should we pay closer attention to their lives and hearts, get involved and encourage them to make better choices about their bodies, minds and spirits? Of course.
But what is most disturbing and, perhaps, most “dangerous” about MTV’s Skins, is that the facile young characters are little more than objectified body parts meant to entertain us.
And by “us,” I mean adults.
Reducing children to commodities — to be traded for advertising dollars, market share or worse, sexual entertainment for adults — is disgraceful.
After viewing the first two episodes of the MTV series, visions of relocating my only child to a sound-proof, WiFi-less, bubble-wrapped bunker in a remote Himalayan village until he turns 18 danced in my head.
My son is standing at the threshold of adolescence. Soon he’ll fully cross over and take steps farther away from the safe harbor of his home and family.
He is beautiful. Strikingly handsome, charismatic, funny and kind. People are drawn to him. Strangers remark on his physical beauty at the grocery store. Girls have started sending him text messages (usually consisting of “Hi. Whatzup?”) and asking to sit with him at lunch. He’s definitely cute.
If I believed the only thing people saw or valued about my child was what they could see — or if he started to believe that was true — we’d be on the next flight to Katmandu.
Thankfully, that’s not the reality. He knows he is a unique, precious spiritual being residing in a physical body. He is surrounded by people who know that, too.
Frankly, I think most of us know that about each other. We are more than what we can see, touch, use or commodify.
Dehumanizing kids in the way that MTV’s Skins does so ham-handedly is as tedious as it is crass. Ultimately, that won’t sell.
The audience for the show’s week’s second episode plummeted from 3.3 million to 1.8 million.
Apparently MTV overestimated our appetite for flesh. Many of this hunger for more than just Skins.
A version of this column originally appeared via Religion News Service.
Previous Post

January 19, 2011
GODSTUFF: Faith, family and failure in "Big Love"
Next Post

February 1, 2011 GODSTUFF: Ugandan pall hangs over National Prayer Breakfast
Browse Our Archives
Select a Category A little happy ARCHIVED COLUMNS BECOMING FAMILY BelieberNess BREAKING NEWS! Disquiet Time DJ JEFF'S SPINTASMS falsani FILM from OCRegister From Sojo.net God Nods GODSTUFF I Take Requests incubatespirit LURKING IN THE NARTHEX On My Nightstand ONEMOMS Polling the Room PONTIFEXCELLENT Thru My Eyes TWO CENTS Uncategorized Upcoming Events VASCO VASCO'S HEART
Select a Month January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 July 2014 May 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 April 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 October 2003 March 2003 December 2002 October 2002 January 2001
Follow Us!
TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz
What was the primary trade good in Biblical times?
Select your answer to see how you score.
Olive oil Spices Purple cloth Wheat
Related posts from The Dude Abides
EVANGELICALS: BEYOND THE LABEL — Where Are the...
Young people were touched by pope's humanity
PILGRIMS CHERISH CHANCE TO SAY GOODBYE TO JOHN...
'This is a church where you can bring...
TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian
Why Christians Have a Sacred Duty to Vote:...
The Bible offers strong support for the sacred duty to vote. Here...
What Being a Modern-Day Apostle Means to Me
In my last column, I discussed the ins and outs of modern-day...
Did Ancient China Once Worship the God of...
Across human history, a common thread weaves through the origins of the...
Love Your Neighbor – Including Earth-Kin: Lev. 19,...
God’s command to love your neighbor means acting in an ethical and...
Lead a Church Study of “Jesus and Lao...
Guest writer Jack Thomas (The Irreverent Reverend) reflects on leading his church...
Principles for Understanding the Apostolic Ministry Today
Whenever people discover that my formal ministry title is "apostle," as in...
view all Progressive Christian blogs
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- About Us
- 2026 Calendar
- Videos
- Podcasts
- Library of World Religions
- Faith In Media Tracker
- Advertise With Us
- Write for Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms of Service
- Do Not Sell My Data
- Contact Us
- Radiant Digital
- Manage Newsletter Subscriptions
- Unsubscribe From Notifications
- Sitemap
Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.
Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In






