Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

The Dude Abides

Home
Progressive Christian
Evangelicals try to reclaim their good name

Evangelicals try to reclaim their good name

Last updated on: January 19, 2015 at 1:25 pm by Cathleen Falsani

Evangelicals try to reclaim their good name 2015-01-19T13:25:27-07:00 Cathleen Falsani

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Chicago Sun Times
May 9, 2008 Friday, Final Edition

Copyright 2008 Chicago Sun-Times, Inc. All Rights Reserved Section: NEWS; Pg. 26
Length: 834 words
Byline: Cathleen Falsani, Special to The Chicago Sun-Times

Mao Zedong published one. So did Ted Kaczynski, Ron Paul, and Valerie Solanas, the radical feminist writer who shot Andy Warhol.

The communists had one. And so did the anarchists, the humanists and the founding fathers of the Unites States of America (although they called theirs a “declaration,” not a “manifesto.”)

Now the Evangelicals have one, too.

Earlier this week, a group of more than 70 clergy, leaders and theologians released The Evangelical Manifesto, a 20-page declaration reclaiming the word “Evangelical” (with a capital “E,” they insist) from the pit of political realm where, they say, it is in danger of losing its sacred meaning.

The word “manifesto” conjures to my mind images of wild-eyed extremists with a rusty mimeograph machine and an ax to grind — the opposite, I’m guessing, of what these influential American Christians had in mind when they set out to right their religious ship.

But the word itself, which comes from the Italian manifestare, meaning, “to make public,” is much less intimidating than what we popularly associate with “manifesto” in our contemporary lexicon.

How appropriate, then, that these religious folk chose one loaded word to describe their attempts to reclaim the proper meaning of another loaded word: Evangelical.

“We are troubled by the fact that the confusions and corruptions surrounding the term Evangelical have grown so deep that the character of what it means has been obscured and its importance lost,” the authors of The Evangelical Manifesto say in its introduction. “Many people outside the movement now doubt that Evangelical is ever positive, and many inside now wonder whether the term any longer serves a useful purpose.”

I couldn’t agree more with their premise. In a dozen years on the religion beat, there is no question I’m asked more frequently and no misconception that I have to correct more often than what an Evangelical actually is.

The association the word has in our popular consciousness is with narrow-minded, condemning, mean-spirited, hypocritical holier-than-thous who belong exclusively to the Grand Old Party, wholeheartedly support the war, are hostile toward science, suspicious of the arts and media, and who would sooner judge you than show you any grace. As an Evangelical myself, this is painful and infuriating.

It’s maddening because the reputation the term Evangelical has is, in part, well-earned. So I’m thrilled to see a cross-section of Evangelicals — from Sojourners founder Jim Wallis and Wheaton College President Duane Litfin, to Notre Dame historian Mark Noll and Forbes Magazine publisher Rich Karlgaard — rise up and face this issue head-on, with a rational, civil point-by-point rebuttal, an historical and theological primer, and . . . a mea culpa.

“If the Evangelical impulse is a radical, reforming, and innovative force, we acknowledge with sorrow a momentous irony today. We who time and again have stood for the renewal of tired forms, for the revival of dead churches, for

the warming of cold hearts, for the reformation of corrupt practices and heretical beliefs, and for the reform of gross injustices in society, are ourselves in dire need of reformation and renewal today,” the manifesto says. “We confess that we Evangelicals have betrayed our beliefs by our behavior.”

Earlier in the document, after reiterating the Evangelical mission to go to the ends of the Earth to invite (not berate) people to follow Jesus, the authors add: “At the same time, we readily acknowledge that we repeatedly fail to live up to our high calling and all too often illustrate the truth of our own doctrine of sin. We Evangelicals share the same ‘crooked timber’ of our humanity, and the full catalogue of sins, failures and hypocrisies. This is no secret either to God or to those who know and watch us.”

Evangelicals are supposed to be known for something — namely, Jesus said, by their love — and all too often have defined themselves by what they are against, the manifesto says. “It is a colossal Yes to life and human aspirations, and an emphatic No only to what contradicts our true destiny as human beings made in the image of God.”

The authors are emphatic about Evangelical not being a term exclusive to any political party, denomination, geography or social persuasion.

It is a theological term. Period.

The manifesto warns against allowing Evangelicalism to be co-opted by any political ideology, saying to do so makes the church “the regime at prayer” and its members “useful idiots” for one party or another.

“Whichever side it comes from, a politicized faith is faithless, foolish, and disastrous for the church,” the manifesto declares. “The Evangelical soul is not for sale. It has already been bought at an infinite price.”

If you’ve ever wondered what an Evangelical really is, I would encourage you to read the manifesto in its entirety for yourself at www.evangelicalmanifesto.org.

And then, if the Spirit moves you, to nail it to your church door. Comment at suntimes.com.
[email protected]

ARCHIVED COLUMNS

GODSTUFF

Previous Post

May 9, 2008

Next Post

May 9, 2008

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category A little happy ARCHIVED COLUMNS BECOMING FAMILY BelieberNess BREAKING NEWS! Disquiet Time DJ JEFF'S SPINTASMS falsani FILM from OCRegister From Sojo.net God Nods GODSTUFF I Take Requests incubatespirit LURKING IN THE NARTHEX On My Nightstand ONEMOMS Polling the Room PONTIFEXCELLENT Thru My Eyes TWO CENTS Uncategorized Upcoming Events VASCO VASCO'S HEART

Select a Month January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 July 2014 May 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 April 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 October 2003 March 2003 December 2002 October 2002 January 2001

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did Jesus say would happen if you build your house on the rock?

Select your answer to see how you score.

It would be fancy It would get destroyed It would stand through storms It would sink