Which book of the Bible is known as the 'Book of Wisdom'?

Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

The Dude Abides

Home
Progressive Christian

Last updated on: January 11, 2004 at 12:38 am by Cathleen Falsani

2004-01-11T00:38:00-07:00 Cathleen Falsani

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Cardinal takes a crack at ‘The Da Vinci Code’

Let’s corner Dan Brown and noogie him until he tells us the truth about his book The Da Vinci Code.

Who’s with me?

I think I might have at least one joiner, if my conversation the other day with Chicago’s Cardinal Francis George was any indication.

“I resent the book, because it does undermine people’s faith,” the cardinal was telling me the other day while we were kvetching about Da Vinci. “It’s well-written, it’s persuasive, and it’s plausible,” he said. “But by the end of the book I was chewing nails.”

I read it over the Christmas holiday. The cardinal read it two months ago. And millions of other people have read it, too, since Brown’s best-selling thriller-posing-as-a-historical-novel was published last spring.

And if you haven’t read it or are in the midst of reading it, STOP READING THIS COLUMN RIGHT NOW!

It will spoil the book for you. You’ve been warned.

Anyway, back to the noogieing.

“It’s just absurd,” the cardinal continued. “If you can believe that Mary Magdalene is buried under the Louvre, somebody ought to go and call for an historical expedition. That happens in the Holy Land all the time, they have excavations. Well, let’s dig up the basement under the Louvre and see what they find.”

Now, it’s not that we, the cardinal and I, thought the book bad. It’s a great read. It took friends and colleagues about eight months to browbeat me into reading it, as my leisure-time reading choices usually run more along the lines of Tom Robbins than Tom Clancy. But once I picked up Da Vinci, I couldn’t put the darn thing down.

The cardinal, who doesn’t have time to read much popular fiction, says he read Brown’s book “for purely pastoral reasons” because so many people had read it and kept asking him questions. The last time he felt so compelled was when he was a philosophy professor more than 30 years ago and read all of Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings books because they were all his students could talk about, he said.

“It’s just a very, very enjoyable book to read, as page turners go,” George said of Da Vinci. “The trouble is, when I read it, of course, I got excited about the things I know are absurd, like Constantine invented the divinity of Christ. I mean, come on!”

See, here’s the thing about Brown’s novel: It’s a novel.

Fiction, not fact.

Or is it?

“The Priory of Sion — a European secret society founded in 1099 — is a real organization,” Brown’s novel begins on a page titled “Fact:” before the official prologue. “In 1975, Paris’s Bibliotheque Nationale discovered parchments known as Les Dossiers Secrets, identifying numerous members of the Priory of Sion, including Sir Isaac Newton, Botticelli, Victor Hugo, and Leonardo da Vinci. . .

“All descriptions of artwork, architecture, documents, and secret rituals in this novel are accurate.”

In the 454 pages that follow this caveat, Brown weaves an unbelievable story about the biggest spiritual cover-up in the history of humankind, one laced with tales of institutional misogyny, deceit, murder and general nastiness.

Here’s a brief synopsis of the plot’s theology: Jesus wasn’t divine. That’s a creation of the 4th-century church fathers. Moreover, Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene, and they had a child, whose French descendants live today, protected by a clandestine goddess-cult whose members include some of the most famous men and women of letters from the last millennium.

And the Catholic Church is hell-bent (truly) on covering it all up.

Those are the highlights.

So, what is it, Mr. Brown? Where does the fact end and the fiction begin?

It doesn’t look like we’re going to get a straight answer from the author, who is busy at home in New Hampshire working on his next book — a sequel to Da Vinci — and not giving interviews again until April, according to his Web site, www.danbrown.com.

Even when he has granted interviews, Brown’s answers to the inevitable “what’s true, what’s not” questions have been a bit sfumato, if you will.

“When you finish the book, you’ve learned a ton. I had to do an enormous amount of research,” Brown told the Philadelphia Inquirer last year. On another occasion the author said his novel was “meticulously researched and very accurate.”

Many scholars of history — religious, biblical and art — have panned Brown’s assertions. But some have said he knows from whence he speaks.

I’m no scholar of gnostic literature, or medieval art history, or “symbology,” but I’ve had some formal training and know enough about church history to be a little dangerous.

Enough to have read the New Testament gospels for myself, to know what the 325 A.D. Council of Nicea was and what happened there, and what the Knights Templar were and what they did.

Enough to know what the Gospel of Thomas, the sangreal, feminist theology, Shekinah, goddess worship, Masons, the Merovignian dynasty and Mary of Magdala are, and what they mean to religious history. Generally.

But not enough to know if the sensational specifics that Brown presents as true in his novel are really true. Which is what, around page 230, led me to wonder if I should head back for the Ph.D. I’ve been meaning to get to in order to figure out whether The Da Vinci Code is a load of horse … feathers.

Or not. Sometimes the truth is stranger than fiction.

In the meantime, happily, Cardinal George already has two doctorates. So I’ll defer to his assessment of Brown’s scholarship.

“The thing that really irked me was this list of the grand masters of a lodge that never existed,” he said, referring to Brown’s Priory of Sion. “There is a document in the Bibliotheque Nationale de Paris, where they talk about a Grand Priory of Sion, but it’s been exposed as a fraud. It would be like using the Protocols of the Elders of Zion as if it were a historical document. That’s what really irks the heck out of me.”

He’s pretty miffed.

“Jesus isn’t God but Mary Magdalene is a goddess? I mean, what does that mean? If he’s not God, why is he married to a goddess? That part, it drives me crazy. What also drives me crazy is that in the present atmosphere of extreme suspicion of the Catholic church, well you see, they covered up the sex abuse and now they’re covering up the fact that Jesus wasn’t God,” he said.

But, if Brown’s story is true, the cardinal’s in on the grand conspiracy.

“All I have to say is, nobody ever told me to keep secret the fact that Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene,” George said.

I’m inclined to believe him.

“Maybe you could start a movement to demand that we search with an archeological expedition for the bones of Mary of Magdala under the Louvre? That would really get the French excited,” the cardinal told me.

I really don’t want to get the French excited in my general direction. They seem like letter writers, I told him.

But I bet the French would be good at giving noogies.

Stay tuned as The Da Vinci Code conversation continues.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

January 4, 2004

Next Post

January 18, 2004

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category A little happy ARCHIVED COLUMNS BECOMING FAMILY BelieberNess BREAKING NEWS! Disquiet Time DJ JEFF'S SPINTASMS falsani FILM from OCRegister From Sojo.net God Nods GODSTUFF I Take Requests incubatespirit LURKING IN THE NARTHEX On My Nightstand ONEMOMS Polling the Room PONTIFEXCELLENT Thru My Eyes TWO CENTS Uncategorized Upcoming Events VASCO VASCO'S HEART

Select a Month January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 July 2014 May 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 April 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 October 2003 March 2003 December 2002 October 2002 January 2001

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which book of the Bible is known as the 'Book of Wisdom'?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Psalms Proverbs Job Ecclesiastes