Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

thecrossroads

Does 1 Corinthians 10 prove that St. Peter is not the “rock” upon which Christ built His Church?

Last updated on: February 13, 2023 at 2:01 pm   by Nicholas Gulda

0 Comments

Does 1 Corinthians 10 prove that St. Peter is not the “rock” upon which Christ built His Church? 2023-02-13T14:01:54-06:00 Nicholas Gulda

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Moses and the Water from the Rock, Juan Antonio de Frías (17th c.)

 

“ [2] And all in Moses were baptized, in the cloud, and in the sea: [3] And did all eat the same spiritual food, [4] And all drank the same spiritual drink; (and they drank of the spiritual rock that followed them, and the rock was Christ.)”  (1 Cor. 10, DRB).

 

A while back I had an exchange on a Facebook group that hosts debate/dialogue between Protestant, Eastern Orthodox, and Catholic Christians.  This particular interaction was with an individual who seemed to fit more into the “fundamentalist” camp within Evangelical Protestantism.  From memory (and perhaps allowing for a bit of poetic license), this person brought forth 1 Corinthians 10 (above) as evidence that proved that St. Peter could not possibly be the “rock” upon which Jesus built His Church in Mt. 16:18.  This of course was not a linguistic argument based upon analyzing the original Greek, but rather one relying on this individual’s belief that only God is referred to as a Rock in Scripture, therefore Mt. 16:18 must necessarily refer to Jesus as the “rock” in that verse.  The rest of this post will concern itself with demonstrating that Jesus being the Rock identified by St. Paul in 1 Corinthians 10, and St. Peter being the “rock” that Jesus says He will build his Church upon are not mutually exclusive propositions.

To begin, even if it were granted that every other example of someone being called a rock in Scripture was in reference to God, that would not necessarily mean that St. Peter is not the “rock” in question in Mt. 16:18.  It might merely be the one example in Scripture where someone other than God is delineated as such.  But that does not seem to be the case, and I pointed my interlocutor to Isaiah 51: 2-3, where Abraham is said to be “the rock whence you are hewn” (DRB).  When my opponent tried to deny this fact, I pointed them to a number of Protestant commentaries which agree with that interpretation.  They insisted that only God is referred to in Scripture as rock [except for when Peter and Abraham are!][1]  And that is more or less where the conversation ended.

What I wish to show below is three examples of Early Church Fathers – in this case fellow Latins – who saw that the facts that the Rock in 1 Cor. 10 refers to Christ, and that the “rock” in Mt. 16 to St. Peter, were in complete harmony.  What is more their words are in perfect keeping with a modern Catholic author who noted that “St. Peter’s ‘rock-ness’ is derived from Christ”.  In the same vein, another wrote that “God is called rock in Deuteronomy 32:4, and the name is now given to Peter, who shares in God’s rock-ness”.  Such was the view of these Latin Fathers as well:

 

St. Ambrose of Milan (d. A.D. 397):

“Christ is a Rock—for they drank of the spiritual rock that followed them: and the Rock was Christ [1 Corinthians 10:4].  He did not deny the Grace of even this title to His Disciple, so that he is a true Peter [cf. Saint Matthew 16:18; Saint John 1:42], because from the Rock he has the firmness of constancy, the steadfastness of faith”.[2]

 

St. Maximus of Turin (d. ca. A.D. 465):

“On account of his faithfulness Peter is told… [cites Mt. 16:17-18].  Although he used to be called Simon, then, he is named Peter on account of his faithfulness.  We read what the Apostle says of the Lord Himself: ‘They drank from the spiritual rock, but the rock was Christ.’  Rightly, then, inasmuch as Christ is a rock, is Simon named Peter, in order that he who shared with the Lord in faith might be at one with the Lord as well in the Lord’s name – that just as a Christian is so called from Christ, the apostle Peter would similarly receive his name from Christ the rock”.[3]

 

Pope St. Leo the Great (r. A.D. 440-61):

“For their stability [i.e. the successors of St. Peter] which the rock himself [i.e. St. Peter] was given by that Rock, Christ, he conveyed also to his successors, and wheresoever any steadfastness is apparent, there without doubt is to be seen the strength of the shepherd” (Sermon 5.4).

 

“[Christ to St. Peter:] Although I am the indestructible rock and the cornerstone … you, too, you are rock for my power strengthens you so that that which I am by my own power will be held in common by you as well by participation” (Sermon 83.1).[4]

 

On Sermon 5.4 above, Robert Eno writes: “Notice that Leo does not deny that Christ is the primary referent for the rock as symbol but he emphasizes all the more the dignity of Peter who was deemed worthy to share this quality with the Lord”.[5]  Thus in the eyes of Catholic commentators—both ancient and contemporary—, there is no inherent contradiction in the Rock of 1 Cor. 10 referring to His chief disciple as “rock” in Mt. 16:18.  On the contrary, as the above authors have stated in one way or another, Peter is rock in a derivative sense, and this is from his Master.

 

 

[1] Cf. Isa. 51: 2-3, Mt. 16:18.

[2] Saint Ambrose of Milan, Exposition of the Holy Gospel According to Saint Luke, trans. Theodosia Tomkinson (Etna: Center For Traditionalist Orthodox Studies, 2003), 235.  NB:  Book VI: 97.  Cf. https://www.angelfire.com/ny4/djw/ambrose.petrineprimacy.html (accessed 1/29/2023).

[3] St. Maximus of Turin, Sermon 80.  In The Sermons of St. Maximus of Turin, trans. Boniface Ramsey, O.P., ACW 50 (New York: Newman Press, 1989), 193.  My emphasis.

[4] Pope St. Leo the Great, Sermo 5.4, Sermo 83.1.  In Robert Eno, The Rise of the Papacy (Eugene: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 1990), 109.  Cf. Eno’s commentary there.

[5] Eno, Rise of the Papacy, 109.

 

 

 

Education and Religion

The Papacy

Jesus

Moses

Papacy

Peter

Rock

Previous Post



December 7, 2022

Ethiopian Orthodoxy and the Immaculate Conception

Next Post



March 2, 2023 In What Sense is Scripture Sufficient?

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Hello Amanda Ingalls, thanks for commenting! For what it's worth to you, in Catholicism there ..."

Nicholas Gulda


Why the Assumption of Mary Stands ..."

"Mother Mary is a Goddess, because She is already worshipped as one."

Amanda Ingalls


Why the Assumption of Mary Stands ..."

"Sorry for this late post, I'm a Protestant evangelical and I don't question that the ..."

Tony


Three Reasons to Believe that St. ..."

"I'm not Catholic and have, over decades of study, become quite "progressive" in theology, treating ..."

Howard Pepper


Modern Scholarship on Peter in Rome


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Book Reviews Byzantium Catholicism Islam Spain The Canon The Crusades The Papacy Uncategorized

Select a Month August 2025 May 2025 February 2025 August 2024 April 2024 February 2024 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 January 2022 January 2021 December 2020 August 2020 December 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019




TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Mark is the only Gospel that records Jesus asking 'Who touched my clothes?' after power went out from him.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE

Related posts from The Crossroads

Catholic

The Canon, Papal Infallibility and the Assumption of...

The Crossroads

Catholic

A Clarification on Constantinople IV and Luke 10:16

The Crossroads

Catholic

Luke 10:16 and the Question of Authority

The Crossroads

Catholic

Three Reasons to Believe that St. Peter Went...

The Crossroads

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

It’s What Comes From Within Which Matters

One of the most difficult things for us to understand is why...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube