Amy Wax is Whack

Last updated on: October 1, 2019 at 10:37 am by Peter Hammond Schwartz

Amy Wax is Whack 2019-10-01T10:37:25-08:00 Peter Hammond Schwartz

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The New Yorker’s contentious interview with conservative University of Pennsylvania law professor Amy Wax (entitled A Penn Law Professor Wants to Make America White Again) is so weird. I sensed some of this weirdness in my own analysis of Amy Wax’s (much-maligned) address to the (much-maligned) July conference on National Conservatism in Washington, DC. But she ratchets up the strangeness in her Q&A with Isaac Chotiner.

Wax is both bright and obtuse at the same time.

She generally defends free speech and free exchange of ideas. She says the progressive left has used the epithet “racism” as a club, to the degree the term has become mostly noise. These opinions make sense. They are reasonable and defensible positions. Wax’s locutions are also witty and imaginative (“[Racism] is a protean term, it is a promiscuous term, it is a term that’s trotted out as a mindless bludgeon, whatever.”). Her insights into the cultural impact of parenting and early childhood development are insightful and engaging (as Jewish woman herself, she wonder, “Why are Jews so Jewy?”). But her specific claims about “shithole countries” are mostly dumb, and not so much offensive as silly.

Litter is the tell.

While Amy Wax is a tenured law professor who has argued cases before the Supreme Court, her ventures into social and political theory and cultural explanation are juvenile in their simplicity and errancy. Indeed, in the Q&A, she freely admits she doesn’t know much about this immigration stuff. She emphasizes the importance of “reality and facts” over “political correctness,” but then fails entirely to offer any facts or data to uphold her views that non-Anglo immigrants from failed states will simply, and inevitably, fuck things up.

In the end, what Amy leaves us with, in both her address to the National Conservatism conference and in her New Yorker Q&A, are anecdotes and nostrums about litter. Amy Wax hates litter and she likes “decorous, neat, clean, quiet, litter-free, beautifully maintained, orderly places” one finds in non-urban, ethnically pure, Anglo-Saxon enclaves. I am not making this up. Please do not send Amy Wax to Baltimore. But please also do not send her to most of rural America, which has its own share of white-sourced litter spume.

And then are the white supremacists.

Amy also cannot stop praising and citing white supremacists and eugenicists. People like John Derbyshire, Enoch Powell, and Richard Lynn, who are not even marginally inside the pale of reasonable discourse. She can consort with anyone she wants, of course, but she should not pretend these are respectable voices. Also, weirdly, these guys are all very old (or dead) English dudes. So not exactly on the cutting edge of anything.

American Jeremiad

Uncategorized

Previous Post

August 24, 2019

NYT 1619 History Project

Next Post

August 30, 2019 From Aquinas to Abortion: Self-Consuming Sexual Sagas of the New Natural Law

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category American Jeremiad Complexity Cosmology Creation Project Culture Demography Economics Education Elections Family History Humor Journalism Language Law Literature Media Migration Nature Philosophy Poetry Politics Psychology Race Religion Science Sexuality Sports Substack Technology Travel Uncategorized War

Select a Month October 2020 July 2020 June 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said: "Do not merely listen to the word, and so deceive yourselves. Do what it says"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

James Peter Jesus Paul