Education of the soul

Last updated on: September 9, 2014 at 2:39 pm by Tim Muldoon

Education of the soul 2014-09-09T14:39:50-04:00 Tim Muldoon

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

David Brooks’ piece on the state of universities today is spot-on, if perhaps (at least to me) rather obvious. He comments on the New Republic‘s most-read article in its history: a piece by former Yale professor William Deresiewicz entitled “Don’t Send Your Kids to the Ivy League,” which laments the mill we send our best and brightest through. Here’s Deresiewicz:

Our system of elite education manufactures young people who are smart and talented and driven, yes, but also anxious, timid, and lost, with little intellectual curiosity and a stunted sense of purpose: trapped in a bubble of privilege, heading meekly in the same direction, great at what they’re doing but with no idea why they’re doing it.

But in a response to Deresiewicz, Harvard professor Steven Pinker argues that there’s something fuzzy about education of the soul.

Perhaps I am emblematic of everything that is wrong with elite American education, but I have no idea how to get my students to build a self or become a soul. It isn’t taught in graduate school, and in the hundreds of faculty appointments and promotions I have participated in, we’ve never evaluated a candidate on how well he or she could accomplish it.

He’s right, in one sense: graduate schools are about good thinking within disciplinary methodologies. What he misses, though, is how incredibly stifling that can be. When all you learn is a discipline, you learn how to use a very specific kind of hammer that makes the world into one massive nail.

Deresiewicz’s Yale colleague Anthony T. Kronman argued seven years ago that colleges had given up on teaching life’s meaning, but his prescription for addressing it– perhaps larger doses of reading Moby Dick and other great literature– is only scratching the surface. We’re bumping up against one of the perennial questions here, one which many, many colleges– and most of the elite ones–abandoned two generations ago: does human life have meaning?

Brooks names the problem:

But people in authority no longer feel compelled to define how they think moral, emotional and spiritual growth happens, beyond a few pablum words that no one could disagree with and a few vague references to community service. The reason they don’t is simple. They don’t think it’s their place, or, as Pinker put it, they don’t think they know.

But like those he critiques, he stops short of offering an idea of what moral education–education of the soul (my term) actually involves.

My experience in the world of Catholic higher education has shown me that we can’t get enough of thinking about exactly what that involves. (Hint: that’s why everyone takes theology, regardless of what they believe. Theology is thinking about God, and thinking about how to think about God. It’s indispensable at a university.)

If you’re interested, read along with my Capstone students one great beginning of answer.

Previous Post

September 8, 2014

College and citizenship

Next Post

September 12, 2014 Suppressing religious free speech

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category academic freedom Catholic intellectual tradition epigenetics humanities mission politics science teaching Theology Uncategorized university life

Select a Month November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What river did John baptize Jesus in?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Red Sea Jordan River Nile River Tigris River