There Is No Controversy To Teach!

Last updated on: February 2, 2011 at 11:21 pm by Jeffrey L. Falick

There Is No Controversy To Teach! 2011-02-02T23:21:00-05:00 Jeffrey L. Falick

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

It’s Darwin’s month, so I’m just going to keep rolling with evolution-related posts for a while.

Yesterday I had a little fun with a frivolous lawsuit filed by some barely literate “former science teacher” challenging the teaching of evolution. While that was nothing to worry about, this bill introduced into the New Mexico legislature certainly is:

House Bill 302, introduced in the New Mexico House of Representatives on February 1, 2011…is the fifth antievolution bill to be introduced in a state legislature in 2011. …[T]he bill would require teachers to be allowed to inform students “about relevant scientific information regarding either the scientific strengths or scientific weaknesses” pertaining to “controversial” scientific topics; The bill would protect teachers from “reassignment, termination, discipline or other discrimination for doing so.”

In an effort to make sure that no one thinks this is about any kind of RELIGIOUS controversy, the bill also states:

This section only protects the teaching of scientific information and specifically does not protect the promotion of any religion, religious doctrine or religious belief.

…”controversial scientific topic” includes biological origins, biological evolution…and other scientific topics that are often viewed by society as controversial….

But as the Bard once wrote, “There’s the rub.” There is no “scientific information” that calls evolution into question that is not “religious doctrine or religious belief” in disguise.

There simply do not exist any scientific controversies about the fundamentals of the theory of evolution that do not turn on a religious issue. There are plenty of scientific disagreements about the finer details of the theory, but there is not one single reputable scientist – NOT ONE – who rejects the framework theory of biological evolution.

Groups like Answers in Genesis and the Discovery Institute would like us to think otherwise. They also claim that they can “scientifically” prove that Noah’s flood really occurred or that modern humans co-existed with dinosaurs. But no rational person could mistake that for “scientific information.”

Blog Entries

Evolution and Creationism

Science and Reason

Previous Post

February 1, 2011

February's Carnival Of Evolution Is Just In Time For Darwin Day

Next Post

February 3, 2011 What Should Replace Religion? Daniel Dennett Knows!

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Blog Entries

Select a Month January 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 March 2015 December 2014 February 2014 December 2013 October 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 September 2012 August 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who walked with God and was taken to heaven without dying?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Elijah Enoch Daniel Moses