More Fun With Science And Religion

Last updated on: October 26, 2010 at 5:53 pm by Jeffrey L. Falick

More Fun With Science And Religion 2010-10-26T17:53:00-05:00 Jeffrey L. Falick

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

One of the best popular science books I’ve ever read is Jerry Coyne’s Why Evolution is True. That’s also the name of his blog, which you can find on the list to the right.

Coyne has been one of the louder voices in the argument about what is being called “accomodationism,” a debate about whether religion and science are compatible. Michael Zimmerman, founder of the Clergy Letter Project, has challenged Coyne’s (and PZ Myers’, et. al.) claims of compatibility. Here’s what he wrote on HuffPost:

The problem, as I see it, is that [Coyne], like Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris, to name just two, feels compelled to argue that science and religion are utterly incompatible — that scientific knowledge can prove religious faith wrong.

Coyne makes it clear that he believes science is rational while religion is irrational, and only science is “equipped to find real truth.” This leads him to conclude that any meaningful dialogue between the two is useless.

After making the usual point about “extreme fundamentalists” not representing most of the religious people in this country, Zimmerman writes:

Many, many religious leaders understand that religion is not dependent upon a single interpretation of any text. Instead, the overwhelming majority of the religious leaders with whom I interact regularly believe that religion is about morality and spirituality rather than science. They want to make the world a better, a fairer and a more just place and they believe they can accomplish that within a spiritual community.

There are great liberal religious people in the world trying very hard to make a positive difference. As a rabbi and Jewish communal worker I deal with them every day. I take issue with them, however, on their claims that the bible and religious writings provide the source of their moral judgment. They are untruthful in this regard. Whenever those writings contradict modern secular morality, the writings are justly tossed aside. Coyne put the problem a little differently:

I agree that they want to make the world a better place. But if they’re all on about morality and spirituality, why do they need to talk about Jebus, heaven, and sin? Why do the Catholics proffer crackers and wine, claiming that they’re the body and blood of Christ? Why the crosses, why the prayers? Why the insistence on the empty tomb, and the idea that somebody is really up there listening to us? Do these have nothing to do with empirical claims about the world?

As a rabbi, reared and trained to appreciate the importance of participating in a spiritual community, I am the ally of my religious colleagues. As an atheist and secular humanist, I am constantly singing Coyne’s refrain.

What Coyne points out are indeed unprovable empirical claims about the world. As such they are clearly wrong. No one has ever said that there should be no spiritual communities. Sam Harris devoted a whole chapter to spirituality in The End of Faith. What we are saying is that they must be compatible with a scientific approach to knowledge:

Zimmerman fails to understand that my goal is more than just getting people to accept evolution and science. As I repeat endlessly (and wish I could stop repeating), my goal…is the promotion of reason.

Reason is what yields a modern morality appropriate to the age we live in. This is why I have repeatedly said that it is time for liberal religious leaders to put down the meaningless prayer book, stick the bible on the shelf with the other old mythologies, and start participating in the new moral philosophy. There is no one up there listening and pretending otherwise is dishonest.

Such dishonesty is a terrible way to teach about morality. Let’s leave the ridiculous claims about biblical wisdom and the power of prayer to those “extreme fundamentalists.”

Blog Entries

Liberal Religions and Theologies

Science and Reason

Previous Post

October 26, 2010

Religious Homophobes With Blood On Their Hands

Next Post

October 27, 2010 "Solid Christian Beliefs"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Blog Entries

Select a Month January 2017 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 March 2015 December 2014 February 2014 December 2013 October 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 September 2012 August 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the first person raised from the dead by Jesus?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jairus' daughter The Centurion's servant Widow's son Lazarus