Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

The Anchoress

Home
Catholic
Terrorist not Talking; Obama Cruises Yemen – UPDATED

Terrorist not Talking; Obama Cruises Yemen – UPDATED

Last updated on: March 10, 2017 at 11:05 pm by Elizabeth Scalia

Terrorist not Talking; Obama Cruises Yemen – UPDATED 2017-03-10T23:05:24+00:00 Elizabeth Scalia

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Noted at The Corner:

To see the danger we face because of Obama’s return to a law-enforcement approach to terrorist interrogation, read today’s front-page story in the Washington Post.

At the very end of the article, the Post notes:

Abdulmutallab remains in a Detroit area prison and, after initial debriefings by the FBI, has restricted his cooperation since securing a defense attorney, according to federal officials. Authorities are holding out hope that he will change his mind and cooperate with the probe, the officials said. (Emphasis added)

Writes Marc Thiessen: Holding out hope? Change his mind? Are they kidding? A terrorist like Abdulmutallab is not a common criminal who should be told he has the “right to remain silent.” He is an enemy combatant, who tried to commit an act of war against the United States of America. He possesses vital intelligence about the terrorist network that deployed him to attack America, and may be planning still more attacks. The Obama administration has a responsibility to make him give up that information. Treating him like a criminal is an abdication of that responsibility, and puts our nation at risk.

There is a later note:

Several readers have pointed out that the Post has mysteriously dropped this line, which appears in the print edition, from the online version:

Authorities are holding out hope that he will change his mind and cooperate with the probe, the officials said.

I guess they have given up hope?

Yeah, so, this is how we’re going to fight terrorism: we’re going to read them their rights, lawyer them up and then hope against hope that maybe they’ll wave their right to remain silent, so we can prosecute them. And maybe they’ll tell us all about the operation that supports them, too, and where they were trained and by whom. And why will they tell us all of these things? Well, because we’re nice, or because they don’t want to go to Federal prison where they can hang out with other terrorists from ‘way back in ’92. At least they’ll have prayer-buddies and fellowship. Or maybe they’ll talk because we’ll cut them a deal if they do. Immunity?

I don’t want to be overly critical, here -and I have no intention of “blaming Obama” for what -except for a failed detonation- was for all intents and purposes, a successful attack on the US, and one that will clearly hearten Al Qaeda; as President Bush used to say, “we have to be lucky every day but the terrorists have to be lucky only once,” and so I don’t call this “Obama’s fault.” Yes, there were serious failures involved here; after 8 years without an attack, we had perhaps become a bit complacent, but -unless a president and administration actually puts policies in place to weaken our security- the blame for a terror attack always goes to the terrorist.

Still, it seems to me that the law-enforcement model of terrorism-combat is not a serious mode of operation in a time of war. We saw this tactic before, under the Clinton administration. Back then, I am not sure anyone really understood what they were dealing with. The WTC bombers of ’92 were tried and imprisoned, but that did not stop terrorism from being used as a means of movement by Islamic extremists. Al Qaeda continued to attack American interests and holdings (and her naval vessel the USS Cole) every year-and-a-half, or so. President Clinton made little overt response to the provocation, even more or less allowing the Cole attack to go unaddressed because he did not want it to weigh heavily on an impending election. What Osama bin Laden saw in all of that was “the weak horse.”

Because we were so very damned reasonable about terrorism, the terrorists figured they could attack us on our own soil. They took out two towers; they hit the Pentagon; they seemed to be aiming to hit the White House or the Capital, as well.

After 9/11, no administration can claim not to fully understand what we are facing; that bird has flown. The Clinton administration might be forgiven for believing that law-enforcement norms could sufficiently address and discourage terrorist attacks on our nation, or our interests. The Obama administration, however, knowing what Clinton did not know – which was “how far” AlQaeda would go – has no business suggesting to the American people that someone who wants to indiscriminately kill as many people as possible, for the furtherance of a specific ideology (and theology) is not acting as an enemy combatant in wartime, simply because he is not in a uniform.

Knowing, now, how far Al Qaeda will go, it seems to me profoundly disrespectful of the Obama administration to suggest that because they do not especially like war, there is no war going on. No one likes war. No one wants war. But to pretend there is no war –that a thing is not a war, simply because you don’t want to call it a war, or respond in war-like fashion- is incredibly disconnected from (and disrespectful of) the real risk being shared by the whole nation.

If my frequent-flyer husband is in a plane that someone decides must be turned into a weapon of mass destruction, I’ll be damned if anyone is going to tell me that these terrorist attacks are “a nuisance” that we’ll just have to live with, that sometimes a bad guy will slip through, and then we’ll then figure out who to jail for it. Terrorism as a means of movement must become an unattractive gambit for Al Quada or any other extremist organization, either here or abroad. The promise of a public day in court and jail time seems to me an insufficient deterrent. You discourage terrorists by doing what President Bush did: you freeze their assets, dry up the flow of funds, destroy the training grounds, take out the leadership and -if you really have the guts to try it- you help a people subjugated by a centuries-old mindsets and tribal grudges to come together and decide their own fate, and maybe help them into the marketplace of goods and ideas; if you create a partnership, you stifle the impulse to destroy.

That’s a vision thing, though. A president who wants to accomplish all that will have to work very hard to both articulate the vision and make it happen, even in the midst of the freezing, and the taking out and the drying up. It’s not easy. It’s hard work, and it takes stamina. And vision.

But even without the vision, a president who cannot (or does not wish to) encourage the sort of democratic change Bush supported in Iraq can still be a worthwhile and successful president f he can manage to keep America safely regarded as a strong, and not weak horse, and the terrorists frustrated.

There are reports that President Obama has sent some cruise missiles out Yemen-way and that he is weighing his options, now; he is doing the right thing. Meanwhile, let us figure out all the ways the dots failed to get connected in this incident. What this attack has shown us is that America cannot afford to be static, because the enemy is not static. Procedures put in place after 9/11 (many of them recommended by the 9/11 Commission) will have to constantly be reassessed and updated. Good heavens, our computer virus-protection is constantly being updated to combat new threats as they emerge. Our national security must be updated just as frequently and relentlessly.

It took Barack Obama four days to identify our failures and find the right (if rather rushed-sounding) rhetoric with which to address the Christmas Day attack, and the failures that would have contributed to the deaths of hundreds. Now that he has found the right words, and he seems to be taking the right action (although…sigh…not wholly), let us pray for him and hope he has the stomach and the stamina for this difficult job.

UPDATE: Obama is taking heat for his delayed reaction. Mike Allen, among others, calls this “unfair”, and Josh Gerstein writes, in Obama’s defense, as well. Both argue that since President Bush took 6 days to talk publicly about the Richard Reid shoe bomber case, it is wrong to criticize Obama. Fair enough, I guess, except for one consideration which does make a difference: When Reid was prevented from igniting his shoe by his fellow passengers, Americans were completely aware that -silent or not- Bush was committed to the War on Terror and to our protection. Bush probably should have spoken sooner -apparently Michael Moore, among others complained about it- but on this issue, Bush was a completely known entity, and no one could doubt that, even if silent, Bush was working behind-the-scenes. Obama, who has increasingly seemed disengaged from things and gave a shaky performance after the Ft. Hood attack, is not that same known entity; his commitment to combating terrorism is not yet so absolutely defined and assured, and -given the timely warnings about Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab- this event is not an exact copy of Reid situation.

Barack Obama should certainly be given the latitude given Bush for keeping mum on the golf course, just as soon as he has demonstrated -as he appears to be trying to do, now- that he can be trusted to go after the bad guys and update our policies and procedures. And yes, we all want him to be successful in this

Byron York appears to agree with me.

So does The Weekly Standard:

If Richard Reid had been allowed to fly even though he was on a terrorist watch list, you better believe that Bush would have taken the heat that Obama is taking right now.

He’d be taking more heat.

Related:
CNN: CIA Failed to circulate report
WSJ: Airport Security Not as Bad as You Think
Hot Air: Yemen is going after AlQ
Clifford D. May: Can Obama learn to fly
Instapundit: It’s Better in Mogadishu?
Andy McCarthy: Bigger Government per 9/11 Commission, not especially better
Examiner: Obama Gives Interpol a Free Hand in US and more on that, here
Jake Tapper: Interpol thing? No big deal, really.
Victor Davis Hanson: They’ll be some changes made
For Crying Out Loud: J-Nap thinks unionizing the TSA employees will make us more secure. Once again, I insist that I be given this woman’s job. I know I could do it better.

Socialism doesn't work

The 9/11 Commission

The Perpetual Adolescents

War on Terror

War, What it good for?

Previous Post

December 29, 2009

Obama and Doing vs Being - UPDATED

Next Post

December 30, 2009 What are your New Year Resolutions? UPDATED

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category "Remaking" Ourselves 'Remaking' America 9/10 Mindset 9/11 trials Abortion ACORN Adoration Advent Advent 2008 Advent 2009 Advent 2010 Alternative Energy Alternative Media America American Catholic Church American Church American Genius Ameridolatry ANCHORESS BOOKSHELF Anglican-Roman Reconciliation Answers & Questions Anti_Semitism Archbishop Hilarion Ayn Rand Bad Mass Barack Obama Baseball Benedict Benedict & Islam Benedict in UK Benedict XVI Benedictine Bill Whittle Birth Control Blogs and Blogging Blogs and Blogging Bloodless Coup Bobby Jindal Bookchat Breitbart Bride at every wedding... Bride at every wedding... Buckley Bullies Bush Bad? Bush Good Buster Capitalism Catholic Fiction Catholic Vocations Catholicism Celibacy Chaput Charitable Stuff Chesterton Chile Chris Christie Christians in Exile Christine O' Donnell Christmas Christmas Gift Ideas Church Hates Science? Church hates women Communion of Saints Compline Conclave 2013 Confession Constitutional Stuff Conversion Crisis & Opportunity Critical Thinking Crooks and Liars Crucible of Faith Cuba Culture of Life Culture of Life/Death Culture of Treason? Dancing Death Dialogue re Islam Dick Meyer Divorce and Remarriage DOJ Domestic Terrorism Dominican Order Don't try me too high Dowd Dumb Democrat moves Dumb GOP moves Economic woe Education Egregious Harry Reid Elder Son Elder Son's Sweet Girlfriend Elderly Election '10 Election '12 Election '16 Election 2004 Election 2006 Election 2008 Election 2010 Election 2016 Elena Kagan Elitism Embryonic Stem Cell Research End Times? English language Enhanced Interrogation Erosion of Rights Eucharist Euthanasia Exorcism Extraordinary Synod Facebook Faith Faith and Reason Faith Friday Faith Perspective Faithful Friday Fascism Again Fascism in America Fatima FCC Feminism Film First Things Forgiveness Fr. James Martin Francis and Islam Francis in America Frassati Fred Thompson Free Speech? Freedom of Worship FutureChurch Global Pandemic GOP Congress Haiti Head Covering Health Care Here and Queer Hermits Heroes Hitchens Holy Spirit Holy Week '09 Holy Week '10 Hoo-Hah & BS Hoo-Hah & BS Icons Illegal Immigration In The Arena Interviews Interwebz Iran Uprising Iraqi Christians ISIL ISIS Islamic State Islamification/Islamofascism Islamification/Islamofascism Isra-El It's all about me! Me! ME! James Burke Jerry Lewis Jesus Christ Joblessness John Boehner John McCain John Paul II John XXIII Juan Williams Just Words Katrina/Rita King is a Fink Latin Mass Leadership Lectio Divina Lent Lent '08 Lent '09 Lent 2010 Lent 2011 Limbaugh Listen to Lizzie Litigious Society Liturgy Liturgy of the Hours Mainstream Media Manliness Marriage Mary Media Excess Medical Merton Michelle Obama Mighty John O' Connor Misc. Miss Ella Missionaries Mitt Romney Monasticism My brother S My Irish Aunties Mystic Monks Nanny Statism Nature NEA Neri New Media Newman Noonan Notre Dame NPR Stuff Nun News Obama Bad? Obama Good? Obama White House Oil Spill Online Retreat '08 Online Retreat Days Oratory Orthodoxy Our Hillary! Parenting Passionists Patheos Patheos Book Club Patrons Paul Ryan Penance Penn Jillette Philosophy PJTV Podcasts Poetry Politics-free zone Pop Culture Pope Emeritus Pope Francis Prayer Predictions Priesthood Pro-Life Public Sector Unions Purgatory Questions about Catholicism Quotes of the Day Quoting the News Race in America rants Recipes Remarried Catholics Reposts by request Retreat thoughts Rome Rudy Giuliani Russia Saints Sarah Palin Scandal Scott Brown SCOTUS Scriptural stuff Secularism Send in the clowns Serving up hot links Sexuality Sherrod Shroud of Turin Sisters and Nuns Social Entrepreneurship Social Media Social Security Socialism doesn't work Sports and Faith Stem Cells Strange Gods Suffering Synod Tea Parties Tea Party Terri Schiavo The 9/11 Commission The Catholic Answer The Constitution The Desert The Fourth Estate The Pelosi The Perpetual Adolescents The Rosary Third Party? Timothy Dolan Touch of evil TSA Tsunami TV/Pop Culture/Music TV/Pop Culture/Music Twitter Uncategorized Unemployment Unintended Consequences US Military Vaginal Musings Vatican Vespers video faves Vile Joe Biden Voter Fraud War by Litigation War on Terror War, What it good for? Why can't weeee be ... World Youth Days Year of Faith Year of the Priest

Select a Month August 2016 July 2016 April 2016 March 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does Jesus say will set you free?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Money The truth Fame Power