Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

The Anchoress

Home
Catholic
The Toxic Card of Racism Trumps Hearts

The Toxic Card of Racism Trumps Hearts

Last updated on: March 14, 2015 at 2:15 am by Elizabeth Scalia

The Toxic Card of Racism Trumps Hearts 2015-03-14T02:15:47+00:00 Elizabeth Scalia

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A few months ago, during the Obama-at-Notre Dame controversy, I had a conversation with a journalist at another magazine, and opined that the whole issue of life vs. death was -and has been since the time of Moses- a contest between light and dark, and would continue to be so. The journalist said, “you just said ‘black and white,'” and teased me for being a racist.

But I’d said “light and dark,” and he admitted, when he stopped laughing, that he had heard “light and dark,” but had immediately extrapolated it to “black and white” and then thought of Obama, hence the tease.

This fellow is no one’s idea of a racist (including mine) and he was a vocal supporter of President Obama. But it was his mind, not mine, that went there.

Blogger and Law Professor Ann Althouse recently invited her readers to speculate on whether the white people shouting “You lie, boy” in Maureen Dowd’s mind meant that Dowd is, in fact, a racist projecting her own racism on Rep. Joe Wilson and presumably, the tea partiers who marched on Washington DC and, basically, anyone who disagrees with Obama on policy.

Because Barack Obama -being a Democrat president- cannot be anything but brilliant and correct. Therefore dissent -which last year was the highest form of patriotism- is now only “racist.” And -as conservative blogger Ace O’ Spades notes here– “Conservatives cannot oppose anything on legitimate grounds. We only can oppose out of fear, anger, hatred and ignorance/confusion.”

So you see, there can be nothing credible in people protesting a president spending more in his first six months than every president before him, combined, ever spent.

There can be nothing credible in people protesting the government sticking by a failed “stimulus” plan that is creating zero jobs in the private sector, as the unemployment number crests 10%.

There can be nothing credible in people protesting a government that will send taxpayer money to Brazil -for oil exploration and drilling- but will not allow drilling, or the building of new oil refineries, or the tapping of natural gas resources, or the promotion of oil shale refining, in its own country.

There can be nothing credible in pointing out that all of those things would create the “jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs” that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi claims she wants to find, and they would increase tax revenues a-plenty; they would help make the country more energy independent, too. But this government is not interested in doing any of that, because America -an environmentally responsible country might -gasp- responsibly use energy made from stuff that might not even be fossil fuels, when what it really needs is a ruinous energy policy guaranteed by this president, in his own words, to “skyrocket” the costs of powering our homes, our schools and our industries.

There can be nothing credible in people objecting to a straw-man loving president claiming, in essence “I’m not going to listen to anyone who won’t work to make this better” (apparently while defining “better” as “everything I want”) after ignoring every line of the opposition’s suggestions, and then adding, “they can’t stop us,” – all while mouthing platitudes on civility and “working together.”

There can be nothing credible in people objecting to an entire congress full of elitist, over-lobbied fatcats who can’t be bothered listening to their constituents because they’ve decided that their privileges translate, roughly, into “we really do know what’s better for everyone else.”

There can be nothing credible in people objecting strenuously to a president naming over 45 “policy czars” who each wield enormous power (and enormous taxpayer-funded budgets) while being unaccountable to congress or the American people – unaccountable to anyone but this president. Cronyism? That’s not a bad thing, anymore.

There can be nothing credible in people distrusting and mocking a so-called “mainstream media” full of “professional gatekeepers” and “mediating intelligences” who decide that no, the American people don’t need to hear about the Communist/9-11 Truther who Obama appointed his “Green Jobs Czar” or the other czar who planned to give money from the National Endowment to the Arts to those artists who would use their gifts for the propagation of Obamian propaganda. And no one else should be allowed to report those stories, either.

There can, finally, be nothing credible -nothing at all- in people protesting a president who wishes to take over at least 15% of the national economy to “reform” healthcare into something that even the NY Times admits will necessitate rationing, will necessitate bureaucratic oversight into what people and their doctors are discussing, will necessitate tremendous governmental intrusion into private lives; healthcare from which the congress has already exempted itself and the president seems less-than-eager to personally embrace.

There can be nothing credible in people protesting the fact that their government “leadership” seems intent on licking the cream from the bowl of American prosperity and ingenuity while telling the taxpayers to content themselves with the skimmed leftovers. Nothing credible in people who want to dream, to invent and to explore their potentials protesting the fact that this government is seriously unfriendly to private enterprise and entrepreneurship.

Nope. It’s all racism, as they say, “straight up.”

Because no one who voted for Obama is the least bit unhappy with his policies. No way. They wouldn’t dare be unhappy, or they’ll be called racists or, if they happen to be black, risk being called “Uncle Toms.” The name-calling and labeling is a rule of the left’s own creation.

I’ve written before (and been called a “racist” for daring to say it, or for even trying to discuss race in an up-front manner) that the race-fixated people of the world may well be the very definition of racist.

Recall Barbara “Call me Senator” Boxer lecturing an African-American businessman who was testifying before congress (and refusing to be boxed in by her citing black liberal groups to him, as though he were on a plantation and supposed to get back in line) “[this other black man] would be PROUD to be here” [testifying before her majesty] said she.

Recall Joe Biden calling then-candidate Obama “clean” and “articulate.

Recall Howard Dean pandering by saying that in a GOP meeting the only people of color allowed in the room would be the waitstaff.

Recall Hillary Clinton making a joke about Ghandi being a gas-station owner. Or was that Vice-President Biden, again?

Recall Hillary Clinton talking about “hard-working Americans, white Americans.”

Maureen Down writes that President Obama is “at the center of a period of racial turbulence sparked by his ascension.”

Well, if there is “racial turbulence,” -and that is the dubious narrative the press and the Democrats are trying hard to install (see the Newsweek cover story, “Is Your Baby Racist?”)- it is not due to Obama’s ascendancy (which did not exactly occur in a vacuum) but to the willingness of so many of his friends and associates to quickly deal the race card, and Obama’s clumsy validations. Consider Gatesgate: while admitting he did not know all the facts about the brief arrest of his friend, Harvard Professor Henry Louis Gates, the president still opined that Cambridge, Massachusetts police acted “stupidly,” during an altercation where perhaps neither the police nor the professor covered themselves in glory. We’re still reading about the incident in the papers, thanks to the president’s over-eagerness to jump into that fray: In Cambridge, there is a 12 person council being convened to investigate Gatesgate.

At this writing, there is not a single investigation being ordered anywhere, however, by any Democrat, into ACORN and its connection to voter registration fraud. There is not a single investigation being ordered, by any Democrat, into ACORN’s willingness to assist others in defrauding the government, evading taxes and engaging in the sex-trafficking of minors.

Perhaps even more importantly, the mainstream press is trying not to report on these stories; on the rare occasion when they do, they edit like mad.

How can that be? Why is that? It is easy to speculate that it is because ACORN is an organization closely linked to President Obama, whom the press adores, but if one wanted to be Maureen Dowd, one could just as easily suggest that the Democrats are so afraid, so paralyzingly afraid, of anyone calling them “racist” that they will not call for investigations of that organization. Rep. John Conyers, (D-CA) to his credit, did call for one last year, but later backed off, saying “the powers that be” got in the way.

One can only imagine that it is fear, again, that keeps anyone in the press or in Congress from examining the Obama Justice Department’s reluctance to investigate and prosecute a clear case of voter intimidation that occurred in the last election. No other explanation makes sense, because both the ACORN issues and the voter intimidation issues are serious matters that demand serious investigation, yet neither are being treated as such.

No investigations are happening; none are so-far scheduled.

And if you and I ask why? Well, we’re racists. That’s why.

Is there racism in America? Of course there is. Where there are human beings who do not take the time to get to know one another, there will always be racism. As cultures shift, as populations immigrate and neighborhoods evolve, there are sometimes flare-ups, too, because people do not trust each other. People trust what they “know” and they assume that they “know” someone who is like them. That may be why President Obama still enjoys disproportionately high approval rating among African-American voters. It is possibly why some Hillary-loving PUMAS still grind their teeth and hate-on Obama because the president is a he, and not a she.

But it is very difficult to cry “racism” when President Obama was elected by a true plurality of Americans, of all races, all classes, all backgrounds, and even all parties.

My registered-Republican Mother-in-Law voted for Obama, proudly. She’s regretting it now. Does that mean she wasn’t a racist when she voted for him, but she is one, now, because she objects to his policies and feels -with some reason, I think- that she and many in the nation had a bait-and-switch played upon them?

The people who loudly scream “racist” at those who dare to dissent from the policies of President Obama need to ask themselves a question: bearing in mind that President Obama has maintained so very many of President Bush’s policies, which should already more than annoy the left and the press (but seems not to), what would they be doing, right now, if it was President Bush who was firing the CEO of the UAW, but not the head of the GM, if it was President Bush’s Justice Department was ignoring a case of voter intimidation, if it were President Bush declaring that he didn’t want to hear from people who disagreed with him, and who told his supporters to, “hit back hard.” What if it was President Bush who was growing the deficit to 1.3 trillion dollars, and doing nothing to help create jobs in a time of record unemployment? What would the folks howling “racism” be doing, if President Bush was naming one unaccountable czar after another to his staff, without so much as a raised eyebrow from the press?

What would they be doing, if President Bush were the guy taking his wife out for a “date” in New York City that costs in the tens-of-thousands of dollars, while people are out of work and facing “longterm high unemployment?”

They’d be protesting in Washington, in huge numbers, that’s what they’d be doing. They’d be demanding accountability, and decrying czars. They’d be calling Bush “Bushhitler” and hanging him in effigy, writing books and films about what it would be like to assassinate him. They’d be drawing pictures of him being decapitated. They’d be calling him Stalin, or using gunfire sound-effects when mentioning him on the radio. They’d be yelling, “hey, hey, ho, ho, this president has got to go!” They’d be demanding to see pictures of the coffins from Afghanistan and saying “we have lost; we are murdering innocent civilians; we love our troops, so bring them home, miserable failure…un-winnable situation.”

But, because the president in the White House doing all of these things is a Democrat, these same people are silent. There are no problems. Everything is great.

Well, everything is not great, but they won’t criticize harshly, or at all, and that is partly because there is a whole “close ranks; you needn’t fall in love, just fall in line” mentality at work, here. A great deal will be put up with in order to acquire and maintain power. Presidents may peacefully surrender their power, but bureaucrats never do.

But they should perhaps ask themselves, these “racist” criers, if they also do not criticize the president because -being utterly fixated on race- they are all-too conscious of the color of his skin; if they are not just a tad too concerned that criticism can only be equated with racism. They’ve used the race card to defame or shut up others so frequently that they cannot imagine a scenario where racism and criticism do not equate.

Whether subconsciously racist or not, Maureen Dowd does, in fact, betray a glaring bigotry in her piece, when she immediately declares that she heard a “You lie, boy,” beneath Joe Wilson’s inappropriate shout. She betrays a mind prejudiced against white Southerners, content to know nothing about them beyond the stereotypes we have all explored with distaste for the last forty or so years, aided in our imaginings by the condescending white racist sheriff in “In the Heat of the Night” and countless other films. Dowd does love her movies and pop-culture, after all. The popular culture is the wellspring from which all of her deathless prose is watered.

I once wondered on my blog whether it is truly possible for any of us who came up during the Civil Rights era to be wholly color-blind, because race was such a huge part of our social upbringing. It was in the news all the time. Bull Conner spraying non-violent marchers and setting the dogs on them. Lunch counters. Dr. Martin Luther King’s soaring oratory which moved my parents to tears. There was Cecily Tyson’s awesome performance in “The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman.” Roots. A Raisin in the Sun. Race-awareness is rather ingrained into us. But my experience in America is that most people are genuinely trying to develop “color-blindness.” Most Americans understand just how ugly and unjust the horrible racism and segregations of the past were, and they’re sincerely working to move beyond it.

That’s difficult to do when one half of the country refuses to acknowledge that there have been some changes made, that things are not as they were even 30 years ago, and that things might be even better -for the whole nation- if one half of the country did not want to hold on to a toxic playing card because it is just too valuable for them to give up or because -even worse- crying “racism” is easier than critically thinking, easier than honestly talking; easier than admitting that maybe, just maybe, Obama would have been a better president if he had first been a vice-president, if he had actually gained some political experience at hearing a passionate opposing viewpoint, and working out a compromise; if he had actually done something beyond voting “present” in his state and federal senate seats while tirelessly, endlessly campaigning.

Attorney General Eric Holder said America was a “nation of cowards” on the issue of race. It is hard to disagree when we watch the press and the Democrats (and the mostly spineless GOP) cringe and go silent, unwilling to criticize a president (or a negligent AG), who could probably use some constructive criticism; when they cringe and go silent again once that president’s pet taxpayer-funded “community organization” is exposed as deserving investigation, all because someone might call them “racist.”

The Maureen Dowds of this world, the Newsweek editors of this world, should ask themselves how much exposure they have to those everyday Howard Deanesque “people of color” in their newsrooms and at their cocktail parties. They allow the Hispanic guys behind their ivied walls to build and stain their backyard decks, or to clean their yards. They very likely adore the African-American who delivers their mail, or opens their door, and they feel pretty good about that. They rub elbows with a few of the more privileged minority movers and shakers, and it makes them feel so very good about themselves, so certain about the purity of their minds and motives; they have no problem shouting “racist” at the drop of a hat, because, well, no one could ever believe they were racists. Look at who they are and where they live! Look at the minority people in their earnings strata that they let into their lives!

Which is why Obama -who is very smart- played them so very, very well. He understood precisely who he was dealing with, when he hitched his star to the liberal media-elites; the people who would attempt to silence all critics with a blanket cry of “racism” when the inevitable difficulties came, and who would be too afraid to ever, ever ask a hard question, for fear of having the scream echo back upon them.

Misc.

Previous Post

September 13, 2009

Wild Horses couldn't take me away...

Next Post

September 14, 2009 Pondering the Triumph of the Cross

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category "Remaking" Ourselves 'Remaking' America 9/10 Mindset 9/11 trials Abortion ACORN Adoration Advent Advent 2008 Advent 2009 Advent 2010 Alternative Energy Alternative Media America American Catholic Church American Church American Genius Ameridolatry ANCHORESS BOOKSHELF Anglican-Roman Reconciliation Answers & Questions Anti_Semitism Archbishop Hilarion Ayn Rand Bad Mass Barack Obama Baseball Benedict Benedict & Islam Benedict in UK Benedict XVI Benedictine Bill Whittle Birth Control Blogs and Blogging Blogs and Blogging Bloodless Coup Bobby Jindal Bookchat Breitbart Bride at every wedding... Bride at every wedding... Buckley Bullies Bush Bad? Bush Good Buster Capitalism Catholic Fiction Catholic Vocations Catholicism Celibacy Chaput Charitable Stuff Chesterton Chile Chris Christie Christians in Exile Christine O' Donnell Christmas Christmas Gift Ideas Church Hates Science? Church hates women Communion of Saints Compline Conclave 2013 Confession Constitutional Stuff Conversion Crisis & Opportunity Critical Thinking Crooks and Liars Crucible of Faith Cuba Culture of Life Culture of Life/Death Culture of Treason? Dancing Death Dialogue re Islam Dick Meyer Divorce and Remarriage DOJ Domestic Terrorism Dominican Order Don't try me too high Dowd Dumb Democrat moves Dumb GOP moves Economic woe Education Egregious Harry Reid Elder Son Elder Son's Sweet Girlfriend Elderly Election '10 Election '12 Election '16 Election 2004 Election 2006 Election 2008 Election 2010 Election 2016 Elena Kagan Elitism Embryonic Stem Cell Research End Times? English language Enhanced Interrogation Erosion of Rights Eucharist Euthanasia Exorcism Extraordinary Synod Facebook Faith Faith and Reason Faith Friday Faith Perspective Faithful Friday Fascism Again Fascism in America Fatima FCC Feminism Film First Things Forgiveness Fr. James Martin Francis and Islam Francis in America Frassati Fred Thompson Free Speech? Freedom of Worship FutureChurch Global Pandemic GOP Congress Haiti Head Covering Health Care Here and Queer Hermits Heroes Hitchens Holy Spirit Holy Week '09 Holy Week '10 Hoo-Hah & BS Hoo-Hah & BS Icons Illegal Immigration In The Arena Interviews Interwebz Iran Uprising Iraqi Christians ISIL ISIS Islamic State Islamification/Islamofascism Islamification/Islamofascism Isra-El It's all about me! Me! ME! James Burke Jerry Lewis Jesus Christ Joblessness John Boehner John McCain John Paul II John XXIII Juan Williams Just Words Katrina/Rita King is a Fink Latin Mass Leadership Lectio Divina Lent Lent '08 Lent '09 Lent 2010 Lent 2011 Limbaugh Listen to Lizzie Litigious Society Liturgy Liturgy of the Hours Mainstream Media Manliness Marriage Mary Media Excess Medical Merton Michelle Obama Mighty John O' Connor Misc. Miss Ella Missionaries Mitt Romney Monasticism My brother S My Irish Aunties Mystic Monks Nanny Statism Nature NEA Neri New Media Newman Noonan Notre Dame NPR Stuff Nun News Obama Bad? Obama Good? Obama White House Oil Spill Online Retreat '08 Online Retreat Days Oratory Orthodoxy Our Hillary! Parenting Passionists Patheos Patheos Book Club Patrons Paul Ryan Penance Penn Jillette Philosophy PJTV Podcasts Poetry Politics-free zone Pop Culture Pope Emeritus Pope Francis Prayer Predictions Priesthood Pro-Life Public Sector Unions Purgatory Questions about Catholicism Quotes of the Day Quoting the News Race in America rants Recipes Remarried Catholics Reposts by request Retreat thoughts Rome Rudy Giuliani Russia Saints Sarah Palin Scandal Scott Brown SCOTUS Scriptural stuff Secularism Send in the clowns Serving up hot links Sexuality Sherrod Shroud of Turin Sisters and Nuns Social Entrepreneurship Social Media Social Security Socialism doesn't work Sports and Faith Stem Cells Strange Gods Suffering Synod Tea Parties Tea Party Terri Schiavo The 9/11 Commission The Catholic Answer The Constitution The Desert The Fourth Estate The Pelosi The Perpetual Adolescents The Rosary Third Party? Timothy Dolan Touch of evil TSA Tsunami TV/Pop Culture/Music TV/Pop Culture/Music Twitter Uncategorized Unemployment Unintended Consequences US Military Vaginal Musings Vatican Vespers video faves Vile Joe Biden Voter Fraud War by Litigation War on Terror War, What it good for? Why can't weeee be ... World Youth Days Year of Faith Year of the Priest

Select a Month August 2016 July 2016 April 2016 March 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was stoned to death for preaching about Jesus?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Peter Stephen Paul James