Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

The Anchoress

Home
Catholic
Obama's prayer: What's the truth, now? – UPDATED

Obama's prayer: What's the truth, now? – UPDATED

Last updated on: March 16, 2017 at 7:17 pm by Elizabeth Scalia

Obama's prayer: What's the truth, now? – UPDATED 2017-03-16T19:17:49+00:00 Elizabeth Scalia

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

**:::UPDATE:::**Okay, so after writing all the reasons why I believed Obama and his campaign meant his prayer at the Western Wall to be private…there comes word from the Israeli paper Ma’ariv – which came under attack for publishing the prayer – that the prayer was released to the press as Obama was leaving the hotel. Which throws everything into doubt. Was the prayer “stolen” or not? Was it ever, in fact, “personal and private” or not? Was the whole thing, after all, staged to gain the sympathy of the religiously inclined, who have been mistrustful of Obama? Am I a schmuck for choosing to believe the best of Obama and his campaign, and not the worst? Has cynicism really trumped everything? What is the truth of this story? Will we EVER know? Will the press EVER ask? Oy!

Big Lizards writes:

Numerous newspapers and other media outlets reported that Maariv claims that “Obama submitted a copy of the note to media outlets when he left his hotel in Jerusalem,” before visiting the wall. This is either true or false:

If it’s false, why didn’t the reporting media who had reporters present with Obama in Israel say something like, “however, our reporter did not receive any copy of this prayer?” That would certainly have put the onus back on Maariv to prove their statement.

Contrariwise, if it’s true, then shouldn’t the reporting media point that out in the story, thus putting the lie to the Obama campaign’s claim that this was a terrible violation of the privacy of his divine conversations?

Yet instead of providing the evidence they clearly had, evidence that would either have supported Obama or Maariv, every last media source chose to stand silent. Why?

Donald Sensing tries to make sense of this.

…Ma’ariv’s rather outrageous claim that prayer of non-Jews don’t enjoy privacy protection at the Wall simply will not hold up before rabbinic responses…Anyway, Ma’ariv’s statement that it published what was essentially a press release from Obama’s staff does change the entire tenor of the affair, and makes the seminary student’s confession and repentance somewhat curious.

Is there one mainstream reporter out there who understands that – if the Obama camp released his prayer (and then allowed to stand reports that it was only published because the thing was “stolen”) – this becomes very big deal to the very believers he wishes to court? Is there a reporter out there who will look into it? I won’t hold my breath.

If Obama abused the goodwill of those who wished to believe the best of him – and who decried the publication of his “private” prayer (and many believers did) – that will be pretty shabby, and needlessly cynical. So much for “change.”

I will not say I was wrong to want to think the best, and I’m still going to try to – because I think it’s really important to TRY to think the best – but if this is true…I’ll be incredibly disappointed in Obama, especially since I came down pretty hard – for his sake – on some who may have had his number, after all. Some of my rant – about people criticizing the content of the prayer and reprinting what we thought was private – is still valid…but we don’t know if anything else was.

I thought this was going to be the “candidate of clarity” the “transparency candidacy” – a little clarity here would be welcomed.

Jim Geraghty has more questions.:::END UPDATE:::

:::Original Post Below:::

The Seminarian who removed Obama’s prayer from the Western Wall has returned it:

The yeshiva student who pried Barack Obama’s prayer note from the Western Wall has apologized.

Identified only by the first initial of his name, Aleph, and with his face obscured, the student went on Channel 2 television Sunday to confess that he took the presidential contender’s note last week and passed it to the press.
…
“I’m sorry. It was a kind of prank,” Aleph said, his hands shaking as he fingered the tightly wadded-up sheet of King David Hotel letterhead. “I hope he wasn’t hurt. We all believe he will take the presidency.”

This weekend I received many emails – a few of them pretty insulting – from people on the right who either mocked me as naive, or castigated me as a stupid dupe for believing that this prayer was really stolen, and that the whole event was not a choreographed publicity stunt from the Obama camp, meant to garner sympathy from the religious right.

It must be said that the religious right – by and large, and to its credit – was horrified by this theft, and defensive of Obama’s right to private prayer. One cannot help wondering if – had the exact same circumstances occurred to President Bush – anyone on left, religious or otherwise, would have been able to manage even a sneeze of outrage on the president’s behalf.

And that is the point.

As I responded to many of these emailers, there were several reasons why I rejected the notion that the Obama camp had staged the theft, the most obvious being that the campaign would have to realize that such a “choreography” would immediately be suspected, as we are all too savvy and too cynical to be “taken in” by much these days. Consider how many people dared to criticize the content of the prayer, either because it was too vague and “safe” sounding, or because it did not whistle The Stars and Stripes Forever upon opening, and you realize that no campaign would be stupid enough to stage something so bound to be a lose/lose for their candidate, where “too much” or “too reverent” a prayer would offend the left and too little would offend the right.

Secondly, the reaction of the Obama campaign told me that the theft was real. Had it been manufactured, the campaign, which sometimes seems like it employs a roving “Outrage of the Day Department” was quiet about it. I know that had my prayer been stolen and published, I would not wish to add to the abuse of that prayer by making statements and drawing further attention to it. I’d simply let it go, and that’s what Obama did. (There is something to be said for heeding the advice of Atticus Finch, and walking around in the other guy’s shoes for a while.)

Thirdly – as some of you know from our email exchanges – I refused to think the matter was staged because I did not want to become like the Bush-haters I know, who are incapable of naming “one good thing” about the man. I refused to give up that much of my own humanity, in order to de-humanize Barack Obama.

That is the trend, these days, of course. Name-call, deride, mock, disbelieve and in all ways go negative – on every issue, in every instance, unto perpetuity – on any politician with whom you disagree, and any pundit you don’t like, and any blogger who does not see things the way you see them. In that way, they immediately become less human to you, and the less human they seem, the easier they are to hate, and continue to hate.

We see it all the time, all over the blogosphere: repellent hate. It begins with calling someone a nasty name, which seems like nothing. But it is the beginning of the whole process of dehumanization, and it is why one of my rules about comments is that name-calling of presidents is off-limits. Bush becomes “Chimpy.” Obama becomes “O-Bambi.” Rosie O’ Donnell becomes “Rosie Oaf Donnell.” Cindy McCain becomes “the pill-addict Cheerleader,” (ah, the tolerant and compassionate!) and John McCain becomes “McShame,” and from there, it’s a very short walk onto the endless and descending pier of hate, which leads you to a place where we can no longer see anything good in “the other,” because you have made yourself willfully blind, and willfully hard-hearted.

When you reach that point, you are no better than the person you hate; you may be much worse.

I believed Obama’s prayer had been stolen and I would not give in to the easy suspicions of cynicism, because I realized that as long as I could name “one good thing,” about Obama – and in this case it would be that he left a real prayer, in real humility, at the wall – I could still see him as a real person and not an object of revilement.

And it would mean I hadn’t completely lost my humanity, either.

I can name other good things about Barack Obama, but for now, let’s concentrate on naming “one” good thing. It is a helpful gauge – a way to keep some perspective.

Early in this blog – to my everlasting shame – I found myself treading the “everyone on the other side is vile” pier, and I did not like where it led.

There be monsters, all reflecting myself.

Why can't weeee be ...

Previous Post

July 26, 2008

Heroic Benavidez, big-hearted McCains

Next Post

July 28, 2008 Brain on Hope: all hoped up

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category "Remaking" Ourselves 'Remaking' America 9/10 Mindset 9/11 trials Abortion ACORN Adoration Advent Advent 2008 Advent 2009 Advent 2010 Alternative Energy Alternative Media America American Catholic Church American Church American Genius Ameridolatry ANCHORESS BOOKSHELF Anglican-Roman Reconciliation Answers & Questions Anti_Semitism Archbishop Hilarion Ayn Rand Bad Mass Barack Obama Baseball Benedict Benedict & Islam Benedict in UK Benedict XVI Benedictine Bill Whittle Birth Control Blogs and Blogging Blogs and Blogging Bloodless Coup Bobby Jindal Bookchat Breitbart Bride at every wedding... Bride at every wedding... Buckley Bullies Bush Bad? Bush Good Buster Capitalism Catholic Fiction Catholic Vocations Catholicism Celibacy Chaput Charitable Stuff Chesterton Chile Chris Christie Christians in Exile Christine O' Donnell Christmas Christmas Gift Ideas Church Hates Science? Church hates women Communion of Saints Compline Conclave 2013 Confession Constitutional Stuff Conversion Crisis & Opportunity Critical Thinking Crooks and Liars Crucible of Faith Cuba Culture of Life Culture of Life/Death Culture of Treason? Dancing Death Dialogue re Islam Dick Meyer Divorce and Remarriage DOJ Domestic Terrorism Dominican Order Don't try me too high Dowd Dumb Democrat moves Dumb GOP moves Economic woe Education Egregious Harry Reid Elder Son Elder Son's Sweet Girlfriend Elderly Election '10 Election '12 Election '16 Election 2004 Election 2006 Election 2008 Election 2010 Election 2016 Elena Kagan Elitism Embryonic Stem Cell Research End Times? English language Enhanced Interrogation Erosion of Rights Eucharist Euthanasia Exorcism Extraordinary Synod Facebook Faith Faith and Reason Faith Friday Faith Perspective Faithful Friday Fascism Again Fascism in America Fatima FCC Feminism Film First Things Forgiveness Fr. James Martin Francis and Islam Francis in America Frassati Fred Thompson Free Speech? Freedom of Worship FutureChurch Global Pandemic GOP Congress Haiti Head Covering Health Care Here and Queer Hermits Heroes Hitchens Holy Spirit Holy Week '09 Holy Week '10 Hoo-Hah & BS Hoo-Hah & BS Icons Illegal Immigration In The Arena Interviews Interwebz Iran Uprising Iraqi Christians ISIL ISIS Islamic State Islamification/Islamofascism Islamification/Islamofascism Isra-El It's all about me! Me! ME! James Burke Jerry Lewis Jesus Christ Joblessness John Boehner John McCain John Paul II John XXIII Juan Williams Just Words Katrina/Rita King is a Fink Latin Mass Leadership Lectio Divina Lent Lent '08 Lent '09 Lent 2010 Lent 2011 Limbaugh Listen to Lizzie Litigious Society Liturgy Liturgy of the Hours Mainstream Media Manliness Marriage Mary Media Excess Medical Merton Michelle Obama Mighty John O' Connor Misc. Miss Ella Missionaries Mitt Romney Monasticism My brother S My Irish Aunties Mystic Monks Nanny Statism Nature NEA Neri New Media Newman Noonan Notre Dame NPR Stuff Nun News Obama Bad? Obama Good? Obama White House Oil Spill Online Retreat '08 Online Retreat Days Oratory Orthodoxy Our Hillary! Parenting Passionists Patheos Patheos Book Club Patrons Paul Ryan Penance Penn Jillette Philosophy PJTV Podcasts Poetry Politics-free zone Pop Culture Pope Emeritus Pope Francis Prayer Predictions Priesthood Pro-Life Public Sector Unions Purgatory Questions about Catholicism Quotes of the Day Quoting the News Race in America rants Recipes Remarried Catholics Reposts by request Retreat thoughts Rome Rudy Giuliani Russia Saints Sarah Palin Scandal Scott Brown SCOTUS Scriptural stuff Secularism Send in the clowns Serving up hot links Sexuality Sherrod Shroud of Turin Sisters and Nuns Social Entrepreneurship Social Media Social Security Socialism doesn't work Sports and Faith Stem Cells Strange Gods Suffering Synod Tea Parties Tea Party Terri Schiavo The 9/11 Commission The Catholic Answer The Constitution The Desert The Fourth Estate The Pelosi The Perpetual Adolescents The Rosary Third Party? Timothy Dolan Touch of evil TSA Tsunami TV/Pop Culture/Music TV/Pop Culture/Music Twitter Uncategorized Unemployment Unintended Consequences US Military Vaginal Musings Vatican Vespers video faves Vile Joe Biden Voter Fraud War by Litigation War on Terror War, What it good for? Why can't weeee be ... World Youth Days Year of Faith Year of the Priest

Select a Month August 2016 July 2016 April 2016 March 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the name of the great final battle in Revelation?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Apocalypse The Great Tribulation Armageddon Babylon’s Fall