Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

The Anchoress

Home
Catholic
Obama, Jews & Newsweek: the MSNBC of mags

Obama, Jews & Newsweek: the MSNBC of mags

Last updated on: March 16, 2017 at 7:38 pm by Elizabeth Scalia

Obama, Jews & Newsweek: the MSNBC of mags 2017-03-16T19:38:47+00:00 Elizabeth Scalia

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In the National Review today, Mark Hemingway looks at what he calls Newsweek’s “absolutely Herculean feat of water-carrying” for Barack Obama:

…before tackling the factual problems, the article’s biggest problem needs to be addressed — Newsweek aids and abets the Obama campaign’s decision to slander Joe Lieberman:

In a brief but animated Senate floor confrontation last week, according to a campaign aide who asked for anonymity when talking about private discussions, Obama told Lieberman he was surprised by Lieberman’s personal attacks and his half-hearted denials of the false rumors that Obama is a Muslim. (The aide says Lieberman was “strangely muted” during the exchange; a Lieberman spokesman says the chat was “private and friendly.”)

….almost as a rule political aides don’t go walking around leaking the contents of private conversations between senators on the Senate floor to the press. It’s also hard to imagine that an Obama aide would accuse Sen. Lieberman of “half-hearted denials of the false rumors that Obama is a Muslim” and Lieberman would have nothing to say about that other than their conversation was “private and friendly.”

So a call to Joe Lieberman’s office was in order. Since Newsweek didn’t make it, National Review Online did.

Read the whole thing. Hemingway dares to shine a light on Newsweek’s “Barack’s No Anti-Semite Happy Dance” and ask if they’re making up the steps as they go along.

Seems to me Newsweek, what with it’s creepily bigoted articles about Pope Benedict XVI and Non-Coastal Southern Scots-Irish Americans, and now its Obama-massaging tone, is positioning itself to be the print-cousin of MSNBC in this new era of unhinged and overtly partisan dubious journalism. (In Newsweek’s world, the fact that they find John McCain’s blog to be better than Obama’s is…wait for it…bad for the GOP.)

Jake Tapper at ABC has more on the tension between Obama and Lieberman, which brings into rather sharp focus the problem Obama has with Jews in general. Yesterday his website scrubbed some vile anti-semitic postings that had apparently been up since April. While the campaign may not have posted the paranoia, they allowed it to remain up there until it was noticed outside the echo-chamber. Tapper quotes a Lieberman aide:

“If the Obama campaign thinks they are going to intimidate Joe Lieberman with these sleazy tactics then they are sorely mistaken,” the Lieberman aide says.

Lieberman, for all his mildness of manner, has always struck me as a Jewish fellow who – quite rightly – is not about to let himself or his people get pushed around. And for some reason – I cannot tell you why, because I do not rightly understand it, myself – all of this reminds me of Daniel Pearl and his terrible murder, and Dave Shiflett’s wise and poignant writings about that event:

The murder of Danny Pearl tells a much different story. For these radicals, the issue is not merely a Palestinian state. They do not believe Israel should exist. For them, there is no room in this world for the Jews. By killing Danny Pearl, who no doubt approved of a Palestinian homeland, they reminded us, if we indeed need reminding, that when they chant “kill the Jews” between chanting “death to America,” they mean what they say.

Slightly O/T, – but only slightly – Laurance Alvarado at Inside Catholic looks at the mid-East view of George W. Bush and Barack Obama. He links to Sultan’s Notes where a post entitled, Obama the Flip-Flip is pretty interesting:

After eight years of a straight talking US President who speaks his mind, we are facing the prospect of one whose fine oratorical style may or may not reflect his personal opinion.
[…]
The Democratic Party contender’s promises appear to swing from one end of the spectrum to the other depending on the audience he is addressing. He had previously referred to the Cuban embargo as an utter failure and promised to end it; yet when he spoke last year to a Cuban-American audience he promised to maintain it because it is “an important inducement for change”.

The same has also occurred with regards to other issues such as immigration and the decriminalisation of marijuana. However, in the emotional Middle East, it was only when we heard him promise to keep Jerusalem united as capital of the state of Israel forever that we began to realise that he is not greater than the sum of his parts.

Mr Obama later spoke on CNN and backtracked on his unified Jerusalem comments as he once again adjusted his rhetoric to suit the audience he is targeting. Jewish voters have come to realise this about Mr Obama and that is one of the main reasons they are justifiably wary of voting for him.
[…]
Whatever we say of Mr Bush, being a flip-flop ain’t one of them.

In another section of NRO, Jim Geraghty (who sees the same toxic MSNBC strain in Newsweek that I do) brings up the interesting fact that Sen. Obama will not release his birth certificate. There are rumors swirling as to why he won’t. I think the one about his name on the certificate is probably closest to the mark. One rumor is that he was named Barry, which is not a big deal – lots of people decide, in processing their heritage, to take a more ethnic name. The other rumor, though, is that it is his middle name that is problematic; that it is not Hussein, but Muhammed. People do sometimes fiddle with their middle names, but if Obama did, but why he moved away from Muhammed (which is becoming the most popular baby name in Britain and elsewhere), to Hussein – a declared enemy of the United States – will surely be something people will wonder about.

Maybe the best way to stop the rumors is to simply release his birth certificate. As Michelle Malkin recalls, John McCain had to answer such basic questions as his birth citizenship – Obama, with his superlightworking abilities – should be able to put something this small to rest, fairly quickly. As president he’ll have much tougher assignments.

Andy McCarthy notes:

Remarkable, isn’t it, that someone so concerned about our image in the “international community,” so offended by Bush’s purported cowboy insensitivity, can get so spun up over “false rumors that [he] is a Muslim.” Even if his accusations against Sen. Lieberman had any merit, why does Sen. Obama — who used to say that his middle name, Hussein, would be a real asset in the signals it would send to the world — now think it’s defamatory to be taken for a Muslim?

Since we’re talking Obama (and who isn’t? He is all things to all people, like imagination, itself) Siggy has written a sort of follow-up to my piece posted earlier this week at Pajamas Media, entitled Obama, the Trophy Wife, in which I had written:

As a trophy wife, Obama would be content to let the Democrats pull out of Iraq; Hillary might actually suggest they stay. Obama would be able to sell the socialized health care Hillary couldn’t pull off. Most importantly, Obama would schmooze and photo-op with the elites for whose approval the Democrats so desperately yearned; Hillary was untrustworthy, there. She might snub Ahmadinejad and, like Bill Clinton before her, pledge to jump into a trench with a rifle to defend Israel. Obama would smile and look good while doing neither.

In The Ecstasy of Easy Choices, Siggy writes:

Obama makes it easy. Obama makes political and moral choices seem effortless, without agony and without consequence. The ecstasy of easy choices- that is the dream that is being foisted upon us, a fantasy too spectacular and too hypnotic to ignore.
[…]
The Leftists today would have you reject everything that preceded their ascendancy. They want the trophy wife and care little for those whose ideas facilitated their rise. They openly admit their revulsion for those who blazed the trail and who now are in the way of their exercising their lustful desires for power and self gratification. For them, it is not enough that Hillary Clinton be rejected. She must be vilified and painted ugly as well.

Someone wrote me the other day accusing me of being shrill about Obama and my dislike for him. I admit there have been times when – writing too fast and too angry – I may have sounded the shrill note, but I do not accept that I have been shrill about Barack Obama. I began with a very open mind about him, and in fact, I credited him as the Moses of the Democrat party, who freed them from the Pharaoh Clinton tag-team. At that time I wrote:

There will be lots of time for taking a long hard look at Obama’s experience, his ideas and his character. For today, let’s just give props to the man for running a clean campaign and re-charging the nation’s battery.

So, now, I’m taking the long, hard look, and what I see is a guy with a socialist mindset, who will say whatever is expedient to the moment and the audience, and who has some very naive ideas about foreign policy and mid-East Diplomacy, a hunger to destroy our military capabilities. He’s got no economic strategy beyond “raising taxes”, no energy strategy beyond “raising taxes” and no plans to re-form social security, or education.

And frankly, if he is not an anti-semite (and I want to believe he is not) he has a long, long row to hoe before he can be convincing about it.

Also…and this might be the worse thing about Obama, in some ways – he strikes me as pessimistic, and – as we learned under Jimmy Carter and his embrasure of malaise – The American President cannot be a pessimist. A pessimist telling America what it “cannot do” (as in “we cannot win in Iraq, the surge cannot work) is antithetical to the historic American character; it disrespects the American people. His “new kind of politics” is a happy face, singing a dirge.

I tend to agree with President Bush that – taking the long view – there needs to be a Palestinian state. But it needs to be a civil and sane state ready to put down the missiles, stop talking about “wiping the Jews off the map” and enter the marketplace of goods and ideas. I want to know where Obama, who apparently sees the “suffering” of the Palestinians but does not see their own aggressions, stands on that.

Oh, and by the way, just in case you haven’t read it anywhere, because you probably haven’t: we’re on the verge of victory in Iraq. The thing Obama and the Dems could not be done is happening. Just something to keep in mind while we await whatever Obama’s (and the Dems’) slowly transitioning opinion on Iraq – which he will not visit, but doesn’t really say why – turns out to be.

And, just note the different tone the press takes: Obama stays out of Cedar Rapids to “to ensure that no resources were diverted away from Iowans”. Clappity, clappity from the same sort of folks, who savaged Bush when he stayed away from New Orleans for the same reason.

I like Jim’s question, here. And note Instapundit’s links and observations:

A new kind of politics? Yep. One even more shamelessly dishonest than the old.

Islamification/Islamofascism

Misc.

The Fourth Estate

Previous Post

June 10, 2008

Not what Thos. Jefferson had in mind...

Next Post

June 10, 2008 Dude, where's my sunspots? - UPDATED

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category "Remaking" Ourselves 'Remaking' America 9/10 Mindset 9/11 trials Abortion ACORN Adoration Advent Advent 2008 Advent 2009 Advent 2010 Alternative Energy Alternative Media America American Catholic Church American Church American Genius Ameridolatry ANCHORESS BOOKSHELF Anglican-Roman Reconciliation Answers & Questions Anti_Semitism Archbishop Hilarion Ayn Rand Bad Mass Barack Obama Baseball Benedict Benedict & Islam Benedict in UK Benedict XVI Benedictine Bill Whittle Birth Control Blogs and Blogging Blogs and Blogging Bloodless Coup Bobby Jindal Bookchat Breitbart Bride at every wedding... Bride at every wedding... Buckley Bullies Bush Bad? Bush Good Buster Capitalism Catholic Fiction Catholic Vocations Catholicism Celibacy Chaput Charitable Stuff Chesterton Chile Chris Christie Christians in Exile Christine O' Donnell Christmas Christmas Gift Ideas Church Hates Science? Church hates women Communion of Saints Compline Conclave 2013 Confession Constitutional Stuff Conversion Crisis & Opportunity Critical Thinking Crooks and Liars Crucible of Faith Cuba Culture of Life Culture of Life/Death Culture of Treason? Dancing Death Dialogue re Islam Dick Meyer Divorce and Remarriage DOJ Domestic Terrorism Dominican Order Don't try me too high Dowd Dumb Democrat moves Dumb GOP moves Economic woe Education Egregious Harry Reid Elder Son Elder Son's Sweet Girlfriend Elderly Election '10 Election '12 Election '16 Election 2004 Election 2006 Election 2008 Election 2010 Election 2016 Elena Kagan Elitism Embryonic Stem Cell Research End Times? English language Enhanced Interrogation Erosion of Rights Eucharist Euthanasia Exorcism Extraordinary Synod Facebook Faith Faith and Reason Faith Friday Faith Perspective Faithful Friday Fascism Again Fascism in America Fatima FCC Feminism Film First Things Forgiveness Fr. James Martin Francis and Islam Francis in America Frassati Fred Thompson Free Speech? Freedom of Worship FutureChurch Global Pandemic GOP Congress Haiti Head Covering Health Care Here and Queer Hermits Heroes Hitchens Holy Spirit Holy Week '09 Holy Week '10 Hoo-Hah & BS Hoo-Hah & BS Icons Illegal Immigration In The Arena Interviews Interwebz Iran Uprising Iraqi Christians ISIL ISIS Islamic State Islamification/Islamofascism Islamification/Islamofascism Isra-El It's all about me! Me! ME! James Burke Jerry Lewis Jesus Christ Joblessness John Boehner John McCain John Paul II John XXIII Juan Williams Just Words Katrina/Rita King is a Fink Latin Mass Leadership Lectio Divina Lent Lent '08 Lent '09 Lent 2010 Lent 2011 Limbaugh Listen to Lizzie Litigious Society Liturgy Liturgy of the Hours Mainstream Media Manliness Marriage Mary Media Excess Medical Merton Michelle Obama Mighty John O' Connor Misc. Miss Ella Missionaries Mitt Romney Monasticism My brother S My Irish Aunties Mystic Monks Nanny Statism Nature NEA Neri New Media Newman Noonan Notre Dame NPR Stuff Nun News Obama Bad? Obama Good? Obama White House Oil Spill Online Retreat '08 Online Retreat Days Oratory Orthodoxy Our Hillary! Parenting Passionists Patheos Patheos Book Club Patrons Paul Ryan Penance Penn Jillette Philosophy PJTV Podcasts Poetry Politics-free zone Pop Culture Pope Emeritus Pope Francis Prayer Predictions Priesthood Pro-Life Public Sector Unions Purgatory Questions about Catholicism Quotes of the Day Quoting the News Race in America rants Recipes Remarried Catholics Reposts by request Retreat thoughts Rome Rudy Giuliani Russia Saints Sarah Palin Scandal Scott Brown SCOTUS Scriptural stuff Secularism Send in the clowns Serving up hot links Sexuality Sherrod Shroud of Turin Sisters and Nuns Social Entrepreneurship Social Media Social Security Socialism doesn't work Sports and Faith Stem Cells Strange Gods Suffering Synod Tea Parties Tea Party Terri Schiavo The 9/11 Commission The Catholic Answer The Constitution The Desert The Fourth Estate The Pelosi The Perpetual Adolescents The Rosary Third Party? Timothy Dolan Touch of evil TSA Tsunami TV/Pop Culture/Music TV/Pop Culture/Music Twitter Uncategorized Unemployment Unintended Consequences US Military Vaginal Musings Vatican Vespers video faves Vile Joe Biden Voter Fraud War by Litigation War on Terror War, What it good for? Why can't weeee be ... World Youth Days Year of Faith Year of the Priest

Select a Month August 2016 July 2016 April 2016 March 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "Let not your hearts be troubled"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jesus Paul Peter John