Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

The Anchoress

Home
Catholic
Sir, that’s not quite what I said

Sir, that’s not quite what I said

Last updated on: March 17, 2017 at 7:34 pm by Elizabeth Scalia

Sir, that’s not quite what I said 2017-03-17T19:34:41+00:00 Elizabeth Scalia

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Regular readers know I generally do not respond to criticisms of this blog by other bloggers – or by anyone, really – I figure people are entitled to their opinions about me, as long as they’re quoting me accurately.

So I was not inclined to comment when Mr. Eric Boehlert wrote this column on December 11 in which he took several bloggers to task for daring to question the AP and for (gasp) actually minding the fact that the AP seemed disinterested in seeking out whether one of its headlined stories – concerning the burning alive of six human beings in Iraq, and the destruction of 4 mosques – was in fact true, and whether their oft-quoted source, one Capt. Jamil Hussein, was a real, and credible, source. Boehlert mostly quoted my words correctly and since I had already made a point of admitting (within an update to the post) that I had been “writing mad…and that’s never a good idea,” I figured I had left myself open to some criticism and was willing to overlook the fact that “mostly” is not “wholly.” And too, I figure people pretty much see what they want to see, and hear what they want to hear, so I didn’t see the point in clarifying myself further.

However, Boehlert has written a second column on the subject and – while I have written very little further on that story (because I am not the “warblogger” he keeps calling me, and I generally write about what is interesting to me of a moment) – he’s still quoting my weeks-old post, and quoting it badly.

Writes Boehlert:

Warbloggers, stressing their contempt for the First Amendment — “The government needs to slap down the press,” urged The Anchoress — would prefer that information about the war in Iraq be disseminated only by the United States military, despite the fact the bipartisan Iraq Study Group just concluded that for years the U.S. military wildly underreported violence inside Iraq.

Well…that’s crap. First of all, what I wrote was, “The government needs to slap down the press and demand some accountability,” which is very different from “the government needs to slap down the press.”

I never have – and never would – advocate the government “shutting down” (or shutting up) the press, which is what, in leaving off half my sentence, Boehlert is implying. What I have advocated – endlessly – is the government keeping the press honest by saying to it, “oh yeah? Who are those ‘some’ you quote as ‘saying’ this? Where is your evidence to support this charge?”

And those are not unfair questions to ask the press…although lately they do seem to think it is. Really, they’re just checks and balances.

I think little of Boehlert’s charge that “warbloggers” (of which I am not one) have contempt for the first amendment (here is a hint, sir, the first amendment is all that allows bloggers -“war” or otherwise – to blog freely. Why would any blogger be contemptuous of it? The one statement bloggers writing from both the left and the right can agree on is at we adore the first amendment. Whether Nancy Pelosi feels the same way is actually the more interesting notion.)

I think even less of his idea that these so-called warbloggers “would prefer that information about the war in Iraq be disseminated only by the United States military,” which is insulting to both intelligent bloggers and the military, and I find odd his assertion that “The warbloggers’ strawman is built around the claim that if the AP hadn’t reported the Burned Alive story…then Americans would still gladly support the war in Iraq.”

When in heaven’s name did any of us ever utter such foolishness? What many of us have said that the press seems to be ignoring any positive news and working to destroy public support of the war on terror in all its forms – what with fauxtography issues and doubtful sources and the narrative that we only went to war because of Saddam’s WMD, and the whole Wilson/Plame/Niger Yellowcake non-story that aimed to cast doubt on America’s motives, and the NY Times’ completely inaccurate report on what 5 judges had to say about the NSA foreign wiretap program – but why go on, that’s just more of people seeing and hearing what they want to, right? Right, so let’s move on.

Boehlert wrote, “The warbloggers’ deliberate and daily condemnation of wartime correspondents as being cowardly, unethical, and un-American is likely unprecedented in American history…” Well, yeah, blogs are new and so pretty much everything connected with them is unprecedented. But as a lifelong avid consumer of news and news-by-products, my own opinion (and I suspect I am not alone) is that the press’ embrasure of “fake but accurate” truthiness and “prove-the-negative” accusation as the acceptable new journalistic standard is equally unprecedented.

Or, maybe not. Maybe the press has always operated exactly as it operates today, and we simply never noticed before.

For all Boehlert’s angry writing, this fact remains: The AP has reported that multiple mosques were burned down and multiple human beings were burned alive. Within the report, they quoted a source they’ve used often – so often that a blogger noticed and said, “hmmm, who is this guy, is he legit?” And that raised***** other questions. If four mosques were burned, why are there no pictures of them? It Captain Jamil Hussein is a ready source of information why is this ubiquitous and apparently terrain-familiar fellow so hard to find? If six people were burned alive, where are the families keening for the cameras, or at least speaking to the press?

And that raises***** other questions, too. If the AP values its credibility why does it offer nothing to back up its story beyond it’s statement that it “stands by” the thing? Why would it not seriously investigate and address the questions about this story in a comprehensive manner – one that either validates their story with something solid, or re-assures its readers that, having been misinformed, the AP is redoubling its efforts to present the news with accuracy. That would be the professional and mature way to address all of this – and it would quell the bellyaching of the bloggers, too.

Instead, the AP seems content to do some piecemeal track-covering and “let slip the dogs of war” upon those troublesome bloggers.

It seems odd to me. One of the things we all learned from both the Nixon and Clinton administrations is that “the coverup is worse than the the thing you tried to hush.” If the AP had simply looked into its own story with professional concern for accuracy, (instead of defensively closing ranks and trying to bite those who dared to question it) and then either verified it or corrected it, this whole matter would be dead and long-forgotten.

Instead, it just goes on and on…

Classical Values has a great piece on all this and Stephen Spruiell says Boehlert has a point, but he kills it all by himself through his own excesses.

*Note: [“Originally read “begs the question,” – admin]

Related: That famous “warblogger” Instapundit rounds things up with a raised eyebrow and remembers some stuff the press would probably prefer he forget.
Has Jamil Hussein been found? Did he or did he not talk to the AP?
Rick Moran concedes Iraq is dangerous/deadly and wonders if that means the news doesn’t have to be accurate.
Malkin stays on it and answers critics
Allahpundit seems annoyed by Boehlert’s characterization of bloggers
Eason Jordan draws no conclusions, yet
Seedubya says he’s been ‘Dowdified’ by Boehlert
Captains Quarters and Jules Crittenden supply balance.

WELCOME INSTAPUNDIT READERS: While you’re here, please look around. Today we’ve also got my last book recommendation of 2006, how Pat Conroy Bravely validates my father’s thoughts, thoughts on Whether Christmas needs to be moved, further thoughts on why Dehlia Gallagher or Lester Holt might have made CBS happier, some ruminations on It’s a Wonderful Life, what Vespers are like in Advent and links to two glorious Christmas pieces. Also, this very post has inspired a lesson in grammar you might find very interesting! Enjoy!

Previous Post

December 20, 2006

Pat Conroy proves my father right

Next Post

December 21, 2006 My Last Book Recommendation of 2006 - UPDATED

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category "Remaking" Ourselves 'Remaking' America 9/10 Mindset 9/11 trials Abortion ACORN Adoration Advent Advent 2008 Advent 2009 Advent 2010 Alternative Energy Alternative Media America American Catholic Church American Church American Genius Ameridolatry ANCHORESS BOOKSHELF Anglican-Roman Reconciliation Answers & Questions Anti_Semitism Archbishop Hilarion Ayn Rand Bad Mass Barack Obama Baseball Benedict Benedict & Islam Benedict in UK Benedict XVI Benedictine Bill Whittle Birth Control Blogs and Blogging Blogs and Blogging Bloodless Coup Bobby Jindal Bookchat Breitbart Bride at every wedding... Bride at every wedding... Buckley Bullies Bush Bad? Bush Good Buster Capitalism Catholic Fiction Catholic Vocations Catholicism Celibacy Chaput Charitable Stuff Chesterton Chile Chris Christie Christians in Exile Christine O' Donnell Christmas Christmas Gift Ideas Church Hates Science? Church hates women Communion of Saints Compline Conclave 2013 Confession Constitutional Stuff Conversion Crisis & Opportunity Critical Thinking Crooks and Liars Crucible of Faith Cuba Culture of Life Culture of Life/Death Culture of Treason? Dancing Death Dialogue re Islam Dick Meyer Divorce and Remarriage DOJ Domestic Terrorism Dominican Order Don't try me too high Dowd Dumb Democrat moves Dumb GOP moves Economic woe Education Egregious Harry Reid Elder Son Elder Son's Sweet Girlfriend Elderly Election '10 Election '12 Election '16 Election 2004 Election 2006 Election 2008 Election 2010 Election 2016 Elena Kagan Elitism Embryonic Stem Cell Research End Times? English language Enhanced Interrogation Erosion of Rights Eucharist Euthanasia Exorcism Extraordinary Synod Facebook Faith Faith and Reason Faith Friday Faith Perspective Faithful Friday Fascism Again Fascism in America Fatima FCC Feminism Film First Things Forgiveness Fr. James Martin Francis and Islam Francis in America Frassati Fred Thompson Free Speech? Freedom of Worship FutureChurch Global Pandemic GOP Congress Haiti Head Covering Health Care Here and Queer Hermits Heroes Hitchens Holy Spirit Holy Week '09 Holy Week '10 Hoo-Hah & BS Hoo-Hah & BS Icons Illegal Immigration In The Arena Interviews Interwebz Iran Uprising Iraqi Christians ISIL ISIS Islamic State Islamification/Islamofascism Islamification/Islamofascism Isra-El It's all about me! Me! ME! James Burke Jerry Lewis Jesus Christ Joblessness John Boehner John McCain John Paul II John XXIII Juan Williams Just Words Katrina/Rita King is a Fink Latin Mass Leadership Lectio Divina Lent Lent '08 Lent '09 Lent 2010 Lent 2011 Limbaugh Listen to Lizzie Litigious Society Liturgy Liturgy of the Hours Mainstream Media Manliness Marriage Mary Media Excess Medical Merton Michelle Obama Mighty John O' Connor Misc. Miss Ella Missionaries Mitt Romney Monasticism My brother S My Irish Aunties Mystic Monks Nanny Statism Nature NEA Neri New Media Newman Noonan Notre Dame NPR Stuff Nun News Obama Bad? Obama Good? Obama White House Oil Spill Online Retreat '08 Online Retreat Days Oratory Orthodoxy Our Hillary! Parenting Passionists Patheos Patheos Book Club Patrons Paul Ryan Penance Penn Jillette Philosophy PJTV Podcasts Poetry Politics-free zone Pop Culture Pope Emeritus Pope Francis Prayer Predictions Priesthood Pro-Life Public Sector Unions Purgatory Questions about Catholicism Quotes of the Day Quoting the News Race in America rants Recipes Remarried Catholics Reposts by request Retreat thoughts Rome Rudy Giuliani Russia Saints Sarah Palin Scandal Scott Brown SCOTUS Scriptural stuff Secularism Send in the clowns Serving up hot links Sexuality Sherrod Shroud of Turin Sisters and Nuns Social Entrepreneurship Social Media Social Security Socialism doesn't work Sports and Faith Stem Cells Strange Gods Suffering Synod Tea Parties Tea Party Terri Schiavo The 9/11 Commission The Catholic Answer The Constitution The Desert The Fourth Estate The Pelosi The Perpetual Adolescents The Rosary Third Party? Timothy Dolan Touch of evil TSA Tsunami TV/Pop Culture/Music TV/Pop Culture/Music Twitter Uncategorized Unemployment Unintended Consequences US Military Vaginal Musings Vatican Vespers video faves Vile Joe Biden Voter Fraud War by Litigation War on Terror War, What it good for? Why can't weeee be ... World Youth Days Year of Faith Year of the Priest

Select a Month August 2016 July 2016 April 2016 March 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In 1 Thessalonians, what does Paul say believers who are alive will be caught up together with to meet the Lord?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The angels Those who have fallen asleep (the dead in Christ) The martyrs The prophets