Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

The Anchoress

Home
Catholic
Yes, Global Warming is Hoo-Hah

Yes, Global Warming is Hoo-Hah

Last updated on: March 17, 2017 at 8:41 pm by Elizabeth Scalia

Yes, Global Warming is Hoo-Hah 2017-03-17T20:41:59+00:00 Elizabeth Scalia

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

An email from a nail-bitten Global Warming True Believer challenged me to explain why I don’t believe in the inevitable terrors of Global Warming. This person wondered how, since I am not a scientist, I am not a sophisticate and I am – gasp – a rightwingnutjob, could I possibly speak credibly on the issue and why don’t I believe people like Al Gore and Bill Clinton – after all, they’ve never lied to me before, like that lying liar, Dubya.

Well, if you’re looking for degrees in Earth Science, then I can’t speak credibly on Global Warming. Then again, Al Gore has no degree in Earth Science, either, and he seems to have plenty of credibility on this issue for some, so many being a scientist is not necessary…maybe you just have to have a brain and the ability to breathe in and out.

Quite aside from the fact that I rarely if ever give credence to an “issue” once the press goes orthodox on it (I remember too many headlines growing up – The New Celibacy! The New Thriftiness! The Coming Ice Age! – to take mass-movements seriously) I have three reasons in particular why I do not buy into the warming hysteria.

1) As Fausta wrote only yesterday, there is no consensus on global warming. You can find scientists who say yea and nay. (I suspect, you can probably find more politicians than scientists saying yea.) As with opinion polls, you can find data to support any theory you want to – which is why 3o years ago, there was all that staggering, scary data about the coming Ice Age. I read parts of Bjorn Lomborg’s The Skeptical Environmentalist and found him persuasive, but what I found even more persuasive was the fact that he (a respected scientist) and former media-darling Michael Crichton (author of State of Fear, which dared to take on the enviro orthodoxy) were both dissed and dismissed by their former worshippers, because they took the politically incorrect stand. If a movement has no room for disagreement, it is generally a fragile movement built on a shaky foundation – one that will not allow the stomped foot of dissent. Such a movement is not credible. And yes, I feel the same way about some of the conservative “movements” with which I disagree. The truth is, out of 100 scientists, only 19 will tell you Global Warming is real, which is why Oprah needs to discuss it with Leonardo DiCaprio – that’s what you do when all you have is an idea you want to promote – you market it.

2) I possess recent memory and it serves me well. My recent memory can look back at a summer ten years ago wherein the horrific heat was finally broken with an 8 day deluge that had mothers everywhere beating their kids because they couldn’t take another day of indoors shenanigans.

That’s too recent, you say? We were already in the clutches of Global Warming ten years ago, but didn’t know it? Okay, 15 years ago, I recall Mount Pinatubo erupting and spewing so much ash into the atmosphere that much of the world enjoyed a wonderfully mild summer …which means that you can’t look at THAT particular year and say, “see, the earth is getting warmer…” because the cool temps of that summer were an anamoly caused by a natural earth science phenomenon…there are lots and lots of natural phenomena, btw – the earth is always cooling and heating, but I digress. I can remember back to the 1970’s when I lived in a different state, and my father received newspaperclips from a friend reporting on the sweltering summer heat of NYC, which was killing people. Thirty years ago not far enough back for you? Auntie Lily recalls people passing out and staggering around with heat stroke in August, 75 years ago. Of course, they wore more clothing, then, but it was hot out. Whenever you hear an affable TV weather guy say “the hottest day since 104 years ago when we reached (whatever) degrees,” you have to take a second to realize that – ummmm…104 years ago we had hot weather, then cool…then hot again.

3) My third and most emphatic reason for disbelieving all the Global Warming hoo-hah is a simple one that lots of true believers probably won’t understand. If the people promoting the hysteria on warming were serious – if the issue were a real one and not simply a political tool, then the hyper-concerned folks would be welcoming and heralding thoughtful environmental programs and helpful policies from any-and-all quarters, even – gasp – from the right. Even – gaspgasp – from George W. Bush. (You know, the guy who frees oppressed women and is cursed at by the feminists, the guy who keeps an eco-friendly ranch and is restoring the destroyed wetlands of Iraq and is hated by the enviros.)

You probably don’t know what I am talking about. You probably have no idea that President Bush has been working with China, India, Japan, South Korea and Australia on a creative – not Kyoto – environmental policy.

…the agreement comprises countries that account for 45% of the world’s population and about half the world’s economic output and greenhouse gas emissions, mainly carbon dioxide, implicated in raising surface temperatures. More Asian countries may soon join the pact.

Fourth and most important, it takes a pro-growth approach to combating the possibility of global warming in the century ahead. The new Beyond Kyoto agreement focuses on innovative technology as the antidote, not only to carbon-dioxide emissions but also to dirty air and economic deprivation. The very first statement in the pact is: “Development and poverty eradication are urgent and overriding goals internationally.”
[…]
The Beyond Kyoto pact, by contrast, seeks to “address energy, climate change and air pollution issues within a paradigm of economic development.” Specifically, the deal will concentrate on the technology that will help China and India, especially, to increase the efficiency of their energy use. Currently, these countries produce twice as many emissions as the US for each unit of GDP.

A major focus will be clean-coal technology. The US is the Saudi Arabia of coal, with the world’s largest supply, and China and Australia are also large producers and users. The deal also seeks more alternatives to fossil fuels with both low emissions and high efficiency – not just nuclear, wind, even biotechnology and nanotechnology.

Yes, I know – you don’t know about it and you don’t want to know about it, because you have way too much invested in other narratives. But the fact remains that if Al Gore or Bill Clinton or whoever else is ringing the sky-is-falling alarm bells were serious about Global Warming…if they really, actually believed that it was real, that it was, as Clinton says, “the most urgent issue of our time, more urgent than terrorism…” then rather than ignore this program, they’d have applauded this effort between co-operating nations.

Instead, the story got sniffed at with disdain, was pronounced some sort of political manuever and then strangled to death from a lack of oxygen. Certain quarters are very good at suffocating stories that don’t fit memes.

So, you know…if the big boys of Global Warming aren’t really taking the issue seriously…if they find it so unserious as to allow the issue to be used as a political wedge or a rabble-rousing sound-bite, and that’s all…well, then I don’t have to take it seriously, either.

The Global Warming Hysteria Movement, complete with Media overhype, is not real. The proof is in the politics of it. It is a means to an end. To what end, I’m not sure.

Flopping Aces has a really good example of what I’m talking about – note the media spin by the AP – it’s pretty outrageous.

Blue Crab Boulevard writes that the AP’s dishonest spin is so egregious, in fact, that even the US Senate has noticed and objected.

Siggy points to a report that reads “To the contrary, there is good evidence that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide is environmentally helpful.”

That’s because as Fausta writes again today, in more detail, there is no consensus on Global Warming.

Gateway Pundit notes it, too. I’m wondering why we should believe a press that will blow off one president’s request not to give up national security secrets while all-too-obediently working to give credence to pretty much anything a former president says it should.

Superfun Power Hour is also disgusted by the AP’s absurd attempt to make 19% sound like 100.

Kobayashi Maru has a good post with thoughtful commentary by his readers.

Big Lizards get the final word, and deservedly so.

UPDATE: Siggy sends these links for some interesting reading:

http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/cause.htm

http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/

http://www.junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/Warming_Proxies_Glance.htm

http://www.junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/Warming_Look.htm

http://www.junkscience.com/MSU_Temps/Climate_quick_pick.htm

America

Bush Good

Hoo-Hah & BS

Previous Post

June 27, 2006

Oh Happy Day! Catholic Music gets saved!

Next Post

June 28, 2006 "...and I shall truly live."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category "Remaking" Ourselves 'Remaking' America 9/10 Mindset 9/11 trials Abortion ACORN Adoration Advent Advent 2008 Advent 2009 Advent 2010 Alternative Energy Alternative Media America American Catholic Church American Church American Genius Ameridolatry ANCHORESS BOOKSHELF Anglican-Roman Reconciliation Answers & Questions Anti_Semitism Archbishop Hilarion Ayn Rand Bad Mass Barack Obama Baseball Benedict Benedict & Islam Benedict in UK Benedict XVI Benedictine Bill Whittle Birth Control Blogs and Blogging Blogs and Blogging Bloodless Coup Bobby Jindal Bookchat Breitbart Bride at every wedding... Bride at every wedding... Buckley Bullies Bush Bad? Bush Good Buster Capitalism Catholic Fiction Catholic Vocations Catholicism Celibacy Chaput Charitable Stuff Chesterton Chile Chris Christie Christians in Exile Christine O' Donnell Christmas Christmas Gift Ideas Church Hates Science? Church hates women Communion of Saints Compline Conclave 2013 Confession Constitutional Stuff Conversion Crisis & Opportunity Critical Thinking Crooks and Liars Crucible of Faith Cuba Culture of Life Culture of Life/Death Culture of Treason? Dancing Death Dialogue re Islam Dick Meyer Divorce and Remarriage DOJ Domestic Terrorism Dominican Order Don't try me too high Dowd Dumb Democrat moves Dumb GOP moves Economic woe Education Egregious Harry Reid Elder Son Elder Son's Sweet Girlfriend Elderly Election '10 Election '12 Election '16 Election 2004 Election 2006 Election 2008 Election 2010 Election 2016 Elena Kagan Elitism Embryonic Stem Cell Research End Times? English language Enhanced Interrogation Erosion of Rights Eucharist Euthanasia Exorcism Extraordinary Synod Facebook Faith Faith and Reason Faith Friday Faith Perspective Faithful Friday Fascism Again Fascism in America Fatima FCC Feminism Film First Things Forgiveness Fr. James Martin Francis and Islam Francis in America Frassati Fred Thompson Free Speech? Freedom of Worship FutureChurch Global Pandemic GOP Congress Haiti Head Covering Health Care Here and Queer Hermits Heroes Hitchens Holy Spirit Holy Week '09 Holy Week '10 Hoo-Hah & BS Hoo-Hah & BS Icons Illegal Immigration In The Arena Interviews Interwebz Iran Uprising Iraqi Christians ISIL ISIS Islamic State Islamification/Islamofascism Islamification/Islamofascism Isra-El It's all about me! Me! ME! James Burke Jerry Lewis Jesus Christ Joblessness John Boehner John McCain John Paul II John XXIII Juan Williams Just Words Katrina/Rita King is a Fink Latin Mass Leadership Lectio Divina Lent Lent '08 Lent '09 Lent 2010 Lent 2011 Limbaugh Listen to Lizzie Litigious Society Liturgy Liturgy of the Hours Mainstream Media Manliness Marriage Mary Media Excess Medical Merton Michelle Obama Mighty John O' Connor Misc. Miss Ella Missionaries Mitt Romney Monasticism My brother S My Irish Aunties Mystic Monks Nanny Statism Nature NEA Neri New Media Newman Noonan Notre Dame NPR Stuff Nun News Obama Bad? Obama Good? Obama White House Oil Spill Online Retreat '08 Online Retreat Days Oratory Orthodoxy Our Hillary! Parenting Passionists Patheos Patheos Book Club Patrons Paul Ryan Penance Penn Jillette Philosophy PJTV Podcasts Poetry Politics-free zone Pop Culture Pope Emeritus Pope Francis Prayer Predictions Priesthood Pro-Life Public Sector Unions Purgatory Questions about Catholicism Quotes of the Day Quoting the News Race in America rants Recipes Remarried Catholics Reposts by request Retreat thoughts Rome Rudy Giuliani Russia Saints Sarah Palin Scandal Scott Brown SCOTUS Scriptural stuff Secularism Send in the clowns Serving up hot links Sexuality Sherrod Shroud of Turin Sisters and Nuns Social Entrepreneurship Social Media Social Security Socialism doesn't work Sports and Faith Stem Cells Strange Gods Suffering Synod Tea Parties Tea Party Terri Schiavo The 9/11 Commission The Catholic Answer The Constitution The Desert The Fourth Estate The Pelosi The Perpetual Adolescents The Rosary Third Party? Timothy Dolan Touch of evil TSA Tsunami TV/Pop Culture/Music TV/Pop Culture/Music Twitter Uncategorized Unemployment Unintended Consequences US Military Vaginal Musings Vatican Vespers video faves Vile Joe Biden Voter Fraud War by Litigation War on Terror War, What it good for? Why can't weeee be ... World Youth Days Year of Faith Year of the Priest

Select a Month August 2016 July 2016 April 2016 March 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who interpreted dreams for a Pharaoh and a baker?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Aaron Joseph Moses Daniel