Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

The Anchoress

Home
Catholic
NY Times illustrates cartoon story

NY Times illustrates cartoon story

Last updated on: May 7, 2015 at 8:26 pm by Elizabeth Scalia

NY Times illustrates cartoon story 2015-05-07T20:26:46+00:00 Elizabeth Scalia

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Faced with an ethical dilemma, the New York Times has chosen to illustrate a report on the so-called Cartoon Wars with an image which is offensive to some with religious sensibilities.

The picture they have chosen is Chris Ofili’s portrait of of the Virgin Mary, painted with elephant dung.

Can’t you just see editors scurrying around, dithering on this one?

Editor A: What to do…this story is HUGE, and by any ethical journalistic standard, we should be showing our readers what the fuss is about. We’d do it if the cartoons were about Christians, or Jews, of Buddhists…but…but…MOMMY! I scared!

Editor B: I’ve got it! Let’s re-print the picture of Chris Ofili’s Virgin Mary! The one with the elephant dung, that’s the ticket! We’ll illustrate the POINT of the riots, without actually risking the wrath of anyone.

Editor A: That’s BRILLIANT! Haul out the so-called Virgin Mary and let her act as a stand-in for Muhammed! It’s not like that painting is REALLY offensive, anyway! The Catholics always get their panties in wads, until the bars open!

Editor C: I’ve got it right here in my hard-drive! Hmmmm…you know, I never noticed before that the Virgin Mary in this picture is surrounded by magazine cut-outs of genitalia and buttocks! I don’t ever remember reading about that! There are vulvas and things on this picture! Can we print that?

Editor A: Print it, just don’t mention it! If you don’t mention it, people just think it’s butterflies! And only repressed, uptight Catholics will care, anyway, and they’re all pervs and drunks and every one of their priests are pedarasts who go after young boys…

Editor B: But…you know…it’s not because they’re gay. Not that there is anything wrong with being a gay priest…

Editor A: No, no, of course not. The pedarasts are just sexually immature because of the repressive nature of the church. Some critics say that if the church would just ordain women and eliminate that whole celibacy requirement…

Editor C: Or, you know…if priests just kept their vows in the first place…Now, if we’re done with all the PC Orthodox Qualifiers, can we get on with it?

Editor B: (raising eyebrow) “What are you, a conservative, or something?”

Editor C: (shrinking) “I’m just thinking, that’s all! (Trembles) No. I’ll be good. Catholics are uptight. Celibacy is dumb. (completely panicked) There is no god but Soros and Sheehan is their prophet? Umm…Bush lied, people died?

Editor A: (lowering eyebrow, somewhat mollified) “Better. Now, you take that picture of the so-called Virgin Mary and use it to make the point about what these so-called “religious” people consider “offensive” art. These yahoos don’t get it that all art is moral! The Catholics will only be mildly annoyed, the blogs can’t say we’re not printing ANYTHING about the rioting, and the Muslims will have no reason to take offense.”

Editor B: (livid) Stupid freaking bloggers! &%$# wannabee writers holding our feet to the fire like they’re actual journalists, or something!

Editor A: (pats him on back) There, there, my tolerant, Ivy-league, J-school, enlightened friend. Don’t let them get you down!

Editor B: Freaking Powerline and Instapundit with their cutesy names and geeky haircuts! Freaking Malkin!

Editor C: Some say she clanks when she walks!

Editor A: (eyebrow raised again) Are you having a problem, today?

Editor C: Dick Cheney runs the show. Condi Rice is Aunt Jemima. Karl Rove is Darth Vader. Bush lied, people died?

Editor A: (barely placated) Better.

Editor B: (sobbing) I just get so frustrated, sometimes!

Editor A: Don’t worry, friends…after the Democrats take back the house in ’06, impeachment proceedings will begin, and all of this will go away.

Editor C: (thoughtfully looking at painting of Virgin Mary) I’m sorry to interrupt, but…you know…I don’t know if using this picture is such a good idea, after all. I thought I read somewhere that Muslims revere Mary almost as much as the Catholics do!

Editors A,B and C: (clutching) MOMMY!

Okay, silliness aside, one can understand a newspaper might be afraid to publish these cartoons. To not admit that there is a risk involved in doing so would be outright dishonest. But news organizations are supposed to care more about the story than the risks, aren’t they, particularly when they are supposed to be the guardians of free speech?

One can see everyone’s point – the point of Michelle Malkin and those who are trying very hard to tell the whole story: that the cartoons are actually rather silly, that they originally were published in Egypt, not Denmark, that they were published 5 months ago, but it took a while to get the Danish flags delivered and the signs ordered so that chaos could be called for.

One can see their point, and agree that free-speech is in danger when a supposedly free press censors itself.

Although, in truth, we see the press spiking stories it doesn’t like all the time, or censoring itself when an inconvenient fact (say, for instance, the fact that illegal Hollywood wiretapper Anthony Pellicano once worked for a former first lady) needs to be unmentioned. So, who knows how free the press really is, these days.

One can also see the point of Hugh Hewitt and others who say, we’re risking losing enormous progress with moderate Muslims by not being sensitive to their own sensibilities. One can see the State Department’s point when it warns that throwing gas on a fire may harm us all.

One can see all of it. To a point.

The point, being when people start blowing things up and killing others, instead of merely protesting and then getting on with their lives.

A serious news editor does not have an enviable job, today. Terrorism has seeped into the newsrooms in the form of intimidation to silence.

It’s funny when you think about it. Practically from day one of President Bush’s first term, we have had to listen to people like Tim Robbins tell us about “the chill wind…” blowing, silencing all dissent. We heard his opinion because he wrote a play about it and numerous op-eds (all of which were published freely, by a free and comfortable press) and their publication patently belied his bellyaching. We’re heard Hillary assert – loudly – that dissent has not been allowed by the Bushies, even as we have read nothing but reams and reams of daily, hourly dissent, heard it from every news channel and sitcom.

This “Nazi” president has never done anything to thwart the free speech of those who would stalk him, or curse him, or caricature him or distort his policies. Usually, he just says, “we can disagree; that shows democracy is working.”

Up to now, the only silencing of the press has been by their own editing pencils.

Today – this very day – the media are finding themselves facing a true “chill wind.” They are getting the smallest taste of what President Bush has had to live with every day – a “damned if they do, damned if they don’t” world of seemingly few options. Bush has shown real fortitude in living on that tightrope for the last 5 years, trying to balance freedom with safety, and responsibility with tremendous risk. Now, the press – if it is going to remain free – will have to do the same. This is the line in the sand for them – where they stand or fold.

One must recognize that their decision, in this climate, could well mean their lives. It could mean their homes, their children.

That’s what terrorism is, and that’s what it does. It makes one terrified. It renders one impotent in fear. Thus one becomes complacent. Obedient. “Why,” one thinks, “should my kids be at risk because of my job?”

Why should anyone’s kids be at risk because of a job? Or a cartoon? Or an opinion? And yet, here we are.

But acquiesce to intimidation, and the kids will be at risk tomorrow, too. And the next day. That’s what giving in to terror does – it encourages more of the same.

If there was ever a time when the press should take an example from President Bush and say “we don’t negotiate with terrorists,” this might be it. Perhaps they are finding that what President Bush has done for the last 5 years is a damn sight harder than they knew. No, one does not envy what editors are going through, today.

America

Islamification/Islamofascism

The Fourth Estate

Previous Post

February 9, 2006

The economy roars, why don't we know it?

Next Post

February 9, 2006 "Grow up," he said. "Grow up."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category "Remaking" Ourselves 'Remaking' America 9/10 Mindset 9/11 trials Abortion ACORN Adoration Advent Advent 2008 Advent 2009 Advent 2010 Alternative Energy Alternative Media America American Catholic Church American Church American Genius Ameridolatry ANCHORESS BOOKSHELF Anglican-Roman Reconciliation Answers & Questions Anti_Semitism Archbishop Hilarion Ayn Rand Bad Mass Barack Obama Baseball Benedict Benedict & Islam Benedict in UK Benedict XVI Benedictine Bill Whittle Birth Control Blogs and Blogging Blogs and Blogging Bloodless Coup Bobby Jindal Bookchat Breitbart Bride at every wedding... Bride at every wedding... Buckley Bullies Bush Bad? Bush Good Buster Capitalism Catholic Fiction Catholic Vocations Catholicism Celibacy Chaput Charitable Stuff Chesterton Chile Chris Christie Christians in Exile Christine O' Donnell Christmas Christmas Gift Ideas Church Hates Science? Church hates women Communion of Saints Compline Conclave 2013 Confession Constitutional Stuff Conversion Crisis & Opportunity Critical Thinking Crooks and Liars Crucible of Faith Cuba Culture of Life Culture of Life/Death Culture of Treason? Dancing Death Dialogue re Islam Dick Meyer Divorce and Remarriage DOJ Domestic Terrorism Dominican Order Don't try me too high Dowd Dumb Democrat moves Dumb GOP moves Economic woe Education Egregious Harry Reid Elder Son Elder Son's Sweet Girlfriend Elderly Election '10 Election '12 Election '16 Election 2004 Election 2006 Election 2008 Election 2010 Election 2016 Elena Kagan Elitism Embryonic Stem Cell Research End Times? English language Enhanced Interrogation Erosion of Rights Eucharist Euthanasia Exorcism Extraordinary Synod Facebook Faith Faith and Reason Faith Friday Faith Perspective Faithful Friday Fascism Again Fascism in America Fatima FCC Feminism Film First Things Forgiveness Fr. James Martin Francis and Islam Francis in America Frassati Fred Thompson Free Speech? Freedom of Worship FutureChurch Global Pandemic GOP Congress Haiti Head Covering Health Care Here and Queer Hermits Heroes Hitchens Holy Spirit Holy Week '09 Holy Week '10 Hoo-Hah & BS Hoo-Hah & BS Icons Illegal Immigration In The Arena Interviews Interwebz Iran Uprising Iraqi Christians ISIL ISIS Islamic State Islamification/Islamofascism Islamification/Islamofascism Isra-El It's all about me! Me! ME! James Burke Jerry Lewis Jesus Christ Joblessness John Boehner John McCain John Paul II John XXIII Juan Williams Just Words Katrina/Rita King is a Fink Latin Mass Leadership Lectio Divina Lent Lent '08 Lent '09 Lent 2010 Lent 2011 Limbaugh Listen to Lizzie Litigious Society Liturgy Liturgy of the Hours Mainstream Media Manliness Marriage Mary Media Excess Medical Merton Michelle Obama Mighty John O' Connor Misc. Miss Ella Missionaries Mitt Romney Monasticism My brother S My Irish Aunties Mystic Monks Nanny Statism Nature NEA Neri New Media Newman Noonan Notre Dame NPR Stuff Nun News Obama Bad? Obama Good? Obama White House Oil Spill Online Retreat '08 Online Retreat Days Oratory Orthodoxy Our Hillary! Parenting Passionists Patheos Patheos Book Club Patrons Paul Ryan Penance Penn Jillette Philosophy PJTV Podcasts Poetry Politics-free zone Pop Culture Pope Emeritus Pope Francis Prayer Predictions Priesthood Pro-Life Public Sector Unions Purgatory Questions about Catholicism Quotes of the Day Quoting the News Race in America rants Recipes Remarried Catholics Reposts by request Retreat thoughts Rome Rudy Giuliani Russia Saints Sarah Palin Scandal Scott Brown SCOTUS Scriptural stuff Secularism Send in the clowns Serving up hot links Sexuality Sherrod Shroud of Turin Sisters and Nuns Social Entrepreneurship Social Media Social Security Socialism doesn't work Sports and Faith Stem Cells Strange Gods Suffering Synod Tea Parties Tea Party Terri Schiavo The 9/11 Commission The Catholic Answer The Constitution The Desert The Fourth Estate The Pelosi The Perpetual Adolescents The Rosary Third Party? Timothy Dolan Touch of evil TSA Tsunami TV/Pop Culture/Music TV/Pop Culture/Music Twitter Uncategorized Unemployment Unintended Consequences US Military Vaginal Musings Vatican Vespers video faves Vile Joe Biden Voter Fraud War by Litigation War on Terror War, What it good for? Why can't weeee be ... World Youth Days Year of Faith Year of the Priest

Select a Month August 2016 July 2016 April 2016 March 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

“For I know the plans I have for you,” declares the Lord, “plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you ______ and a future.”

Select your answer to see how you score.

Hope Salvation Life Love