Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

The Anchoress

Home
Catholic
Bill Clinton’s Captive Heart?

Bill Clinton’s Captive Heart?

Last updated on: March 16, 2017 at 10:57 pm by Elizabeth Scalia

Bill Clinton’s Captive Heart? 2017-03-16T22:57:31+00:00 Elizabeth Scalia

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The blogosphere and the folks in the press are all of a doo-dah because Bill Clinton “leveled sharp criticism” at President Bush; because Clinton “launched a withering attack” on his successor (something his predecessor, it must be said, refused to do when Clinton was in office, and even after).

Former President Bill Clinton “lambasted” President George W. Bush, and some in the press would have you believe this is something he has never done before.

Actually, President Clinton has tiptoed around the tactic of lambasting, sharply criticising or launching a “withering” attack against President Bush, several times. He has simply had the sense to do so tentatively, and discreetly – inserting a sly dig at Davos, a mild remark in Rio. This weekend, bouyed by campaign-trailish coverage and the sort of wonky gasbag-fest we know always energizes him, Clinton simply decided to get off his tippy-toes and step lively.

Some of this was predictable. The extreme left of the Democrat Party has grown into a fuming beast that needs constant feeding as it stomps around its cage, waiting to be unleashed. Because Mrs. Clinton is planning a run at the White House, she and her husband are simply shoveling at them the same Triangulation Kibble they used to feed the left (and the center) in 1991 and 1992 – except that this time the ingredients are reversed: this time Bill Clinton is the Hard Left Outside while Hillary is the Deeply Moderate Center. Same food, different packaging; it is a particularly useful recipe for both Clintons because his “centrist” credentials, and her “leftist” credentials are so firmly in place, that no matter how the ingredients are mixed, the same multitudes are fed, and things even taste the same.

All of that is so predictable, it’s almost boring. Bill and Hill are smothering us again, gearing up for another leg of their endless campaign. What’s on Channel 38?

In another way, yesterday’s unloading was simply Bill Clinton doing what he has always done. He serves not God, nor country, nor the simple dignity of an Office quite worthy of respect, before he serves his own towering ambition, and his other, sadly insatiable (and ultimately destructive) need – his need to be loved.

In this respect, President Clinton’s foregoing every tradition and precedent concerning how members of this very exclusive “President’s Club” treat each other has less to do with strategy and marketing and much more to do with his own damaged heart.

If you know nothing else about Bill Clinton than the fact that he grew up sort of “between fathers,” with a somewhat colorful and flamboyant mother, that he was a bright boy full to the brim with talent, but lugging around an aching void that was never filled and never healed, then you know enough about Bill Clinton to know why he dropped a bomb on George W. Bush yesterday.

Bill was the boy with nothing. George W. Bush was the boy with everything.

I’m not talking about material things, here. “Things” make one neither holy nor whole. Anyone who has read the letters of George H.W. Bush or really looked into the early years of George Walker Bush knows that the younger Bush grew up in a rather average house, with average playmates and a public elementary school. Nevertheless, George W. Bush had something Bill Clinton never had: a father who clearly loved him and a devoted mother whose first interest lay with her family. Forget material considerations. With those ample riches, the boy called Dubya grew up comfortable in his own skin and not needing to look outside of who he was, or who he loved, to find trustworthy affirmation and acceptance.

I have several memories of President Clinton in the days after the attacks of 9/11. Two of them stand out, and unfortunately, neither of them can be linked to, here, because – while I remember both events vividly – they cannot be found with internet search engines, and I wasn’t prescient enough to put them into a hard drive.

The first is a memory of a photograph taken at the National Cathedral on the National Day of Prayer, a few days after the attacks. President Bush had just made a stirring speech and returned to his seat, and his father, eyes misty with emotion, reached over to his son and grasped his hand in love and pride. Sitting a little further down the pew, Bill Clinton looked directly at the father and son with an expression of such heartfelt pain, grief and envy that my own heart broke for him. In that expression there was something very deep, very human and very raw, and I never “loved” Bill Clinton more than I did when gazing at that picture and taking in that 400-page Russian novel of a look.

I have searched, many times, for that photograph – in internet search engines and even in newspaper archives. The picture is easy to find, but always cropped – Bill Clinton is no longer visible in the Father/Son Bush Moment, or he has already looked away, red-faced. It’s too bad. One look at that picture goes a long way toward sympathetically explaining President Clinton.

The other memory I have is of a reporter coming up to Bill Clinton on the morning after Dubya gave a stirring speech to the joint session of Congress on September 20, 2001, a speech that even Bush’s harshest critics conceded was “stunningly effective and heartfelt.” The reporter asked Bill Clinton what he had thought of the speech and Clinton – former president and political junkie – replied shortly, “I didn’t watch it.”

Hard to believe he did not watch it. Not difficult to believe that in that instant a boy who grew up Billy Blythe-why-don’t-you-call-yourself-Clinton could not bear to extend a word of praise for a boy who grew up Dubya-you’re-our-boy, a boy who still had the love of his father and the adoration of his mother, and who was now being given a chance to do something “great.”

“Great” things have happened on Dubya’s watch. Yesterday the people of Afghanistan braved threats in order to vote – to have their fingers stained purple, just like the folks in Iraq a few months ago. You haven’t read much about it in the press, because the wrong president had a hand in this “great” event. Had Bill Clinton liberated Afghanistan, or brokered this deal with N. Korea, well…both Mr. Clinton and the press would be very, very happy, today. Dynamite would be on order for Mt. Rushmore.

We have been told that privately President Clinton has regretted the fact that during his 8 years in office such “opportunities for greatness” did not present themselves. Clinton, we were told, felt a little cheated that nothing happened on his watch that required bold action – and bold actions – not moderation and talkfests – beget “greatness.”

This is nonsense, of course. Opportunities present themselves in every age and the 1990’s were less a “vacation from history” than an administrative decision not to engage history, if at all possible. Hence, during the 1990’s Rwanda ran red with genocidal blood, tyrants dug in their heels, China amassed Western technologies, North Korea gathered nuclear material, and Islamofascist terrorists blew up American interests, holdings and naval vessels in regular two year intervals, and with seeming impunity. But Clintonian peace (“playing all things safe”) polled well, and if you translate poll numbers as love, and if love is the thing you crave above all…well…poll numbers can do the job, on some level.

President Clinton has been talking and talking and talking for the past few days, and when you talk that much, particularly when you know you are among friends, particularly if you are a little intoxicated from the heady brew of non-stop praise, you are apt to get a little sloppy with your pronouncements, and yesterday, Clinton got sloppy.

He has been all over the news as his “Clinton Global Initiative” invaded New York. The gathering, we were told, was an opportunity for President Clinton and his gaggle of wealthy pals to talk exhaustively on (and pledge money, or something to) one of four “critical challenges” – poverty, religious conflict, climate change and good governance. Notice, if you will that the threat of terrorism is not on that list. It is a subject that Clinton never quite seems to want on his radar.

Prior to the three day Clintonfest, the press began laying down palms and singing some troubling hosannas. As the weekend drew to a close, Clinton began to sing his own song and it had very simple lyrics: Billy is good. Not like that Dubya. Billy is a good, good boy.

Clinton said the Bush administration had decided to invade Iraq “virtually alone and before UN inspections were completed, with no real urgency, no evidence that there were weapons of mass destruction.”

Sloppy. As Jason asks:

Does this mean Bill Clinton is admitting he bombed Iraq to deflect attention away from his personal legal troubles? Because if the danger in Iraq presented “no real urgency” then how should these quotes be interpreted?
February 16, 1993 – “The regime of Saddam Hussein continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States, as well as to regional peace and security.

June 26, 1993 – “… the Iraqi attack against President Bush was an attack against our country and against all Americans… Saddam Hussein has demonstrated repeatedly that he will resort to terrorism or aggression if left unchecked…”

April 7, 1994 – “Continued vigilance is necessary because we believe that Saddam Hussein is committed to rebuilding his weapons of mass destruction (WMD) capability.

August 2, 1999 – “We are convinced that as long as Saddam Hussein remains in power, he will continue to threaten the well-being of his people, the peace of the region, and vital U.S. interests. … Iraq remains a serious threat to international peace and security.”

Powerline looks at other “bombs” Clinton dropped yesterday, on the handling of the Katrina disaster (he would have handled it better…maybe… even though FEMA didn’t get to Hurricanes Andrew or Hugo any more effectively than they did Katrina…), or the failure of the Iraqi Constitution to get “universal support,” (he would have done it better, but it might work out, anyway…) and they wonder about this Clinton quote from July 23, 2003:

I]t is incontestable that on the day I left office, there were unaccounted for stocks of biological and chemical weapons (in Iraq).

And then there is this – Clinton’s 1998 Statement on Iraq.

Sloppy, sloppy. When Bill Clinton is thinking with his head, he is too smart to be this sloppy – to make such controversial remarks that are so easily checked, and so easily contradicted.

No, President Clinton seems to be currently leading with that worrisome, troubled heart.

But…some might wonder…”how can he be leading with this heart if he’s going after Dubya, after all, he’s been working closely with Bush 41 on Tsunami and Katrina Relief, and by all accounts he really loves the old man…”

Yes, that’s problematic, that love. That Bush Senior is a warm, weepy gush of a man, particularly in his advanced years, is no secret, and it is very easy to believe that Bill Clinton – a genuine “people person,” might respond to that warmth – a fatherly warmth, shared by a man who also shared an office. We’ve read reports that Barbara Bush has referred to President Clinton as “son.” I can’t help but wonder if some of Clinton’s “lambasting” isn’t some sort of sibling-ish test of parental love (if I do this will you still love me? If I do that, will you? What about this?) or even a sibling rivalry?

Or, perhaps Clinton is not “testing” the Bush parents but simply falling apart because he doesn’t know if this “love” from them is real. It might be genuine. Wouldn’t that be great, like having real parents, a real family, a real father…but no…it can’t be. He mustn’t allow himself to believe that it might be real love, because if he succumbed to it, and he might want to – that could wreck so many of his plans!

But oh…how he might very willingly fall for a motherly pat on the back and the grasping hand of a father whose eyes are wet with pride.

And what if it isn’t real? What if this fondness, this “parental” sort of regard by the Bush elders is nothing but a strategy, a triangulation of their own, a way to get Bill Clinton to hoe the Bushian row…then…what incredible anger such trickery might provoke! He’ll have to show them he is too smart for their wily plans…he’ll pull away and play to his base – to the people who really, really love him, and whose love is never scary because it is always under his control!

This is very troubling stuff to consider. Very sad, troubling stuff. When a void needs to be filled with love, but it cannot be because love is confusing, or threatening, or simply not in the plans, then the void will be filled with something else.

I wonder if in Clinton’s profound need to be loved, either by “his public” or his “Bush parents” he is not approaching a place that is very self-destructive. Hate and love are separated by a thin line, and the thin line is often made up of equal parts self-loathing and doubt.

Self-loathing and doubt? Could Clinton be experiencing such things? Maybe.

The Able Danger story is suggesting that warnings went unheeded regarding the attack on the USS COLE, and that enormous amounts of documentation – “2.5 terabytes” – as much as one-fourth of all the printed materials in the Library of Congress,” have been destroyed by order of…someone. Witnesses want to testify, the Judiciary committee does not want the testimony to be public.

The story has been buried due to Katrina news and Katrina Bush-blaming, Clinton news and Clinton Bush-blaming, and an unsurprising move by many in the mainstream press to keep the story relagated to page 34 of section B, below the fold. Now, with public hearings set for Wednesday, perhaps all of this verbage from President Clinton is nothing more than a pre-emptive strike – a way to minimize any damage from Able Danger by saying it is all “a spiteful response to Clinton’s measured critiques.” Could be.

But all the misdirection in the world can’t keep a true story of malfeasance, mismanagement and political paralysis from finally breaking the surface, and maybe that – more than anything – accounts for so much that seems sad and crazy and overwrought in American politics, these days.

No one ever said Bill Clinton didn’t know how to get in front of a story, and so maybe all of my theories are nonsense, and Clinton is merely taking evasive action. But I don’t think so. Bill Clinton may be a political animal, but he is still a human one, first and foremost, and a wounded one.

More and more, one cannot help wondering exactly what sort of state secrets Sandy Berger was spiriting out of the National Archives in his pants, and whether those papers had anything to do with Able Danger.

More and more, one cannot help wondering if the an investigation into Pantsgate and Able Danger is something Bill Clinton is jealously thinking of as “one more break for Dubya,” or even worse, a terrible breach of love.

UPDATE: Gateway Pundit has a very impressive lookback at various Clinton quotes and times, and Lorie Byrd is most seriously displeased with President Clinton’s antics, particularly with his very odd pronouncement that we are “losing in Afghanistan.” She has links. Lots of links!

Bride at every wedding...

Previous Post

September 18, 2005

This is not permission...

Next Post

September 19, 2005 A masterful exposition (updated)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category "Remaking" Ourselves 'Remaking' America 9/10 Mindset 9/11 trials Abortion ACORN Adoration Advent Advent 2008 Advent 2009 Advent 2010 Alternative Energy Alternative Media America American Catholic Church American Church American Genius Ameridolatry ANCHORESS BOOKSHELF Anglican-Roman Reconciliation Answers & Questions Anti_Semitism Archbishop Hilarion Ayn Rand Bad Mass Barack Obama Baseball Benedict Benedict & Islam Benedict in UK Benedict XVI Benedictine Bill Whittle Birth Control Blogs and Blogging Blogs and Blogging Bloodless Coup Bobby Jindal Bookchat Breitbart Bride at every wedding... Bride at every wedding... Buckley Bullies Bush Bad? Bush Good Buster Capitalism Catholic Fiction Catholic Vocations Catholicism Celibacy Chaput Charitable Stuff Chesterton Chile Chris Christie Christians in Exile Christine O' Donnell Christmas Christmas Gift Ideas Church Hates Science? Church hates women Communion of Saints Compline Conclave 2013 Confession Constitutional Stuff Conversion Crisis & Opportunity Critical Thinking Crooks and Liars Crucible of Faith Cuba Culture of Life Culture of Life/Death Culture of Treason? Dancing Death Dialogue re Islam Dick Meyer Divorce and Remarriage DOJ Domestic Terrorism Dominican Order Don't try me too high Dowd Dumb Democrat moves Dumb GOP moves Economic woe Education Egregious Harry Reid Elder Son Elder Son's Sweet Girlfriend Elderly Election '10 Election '12 Election '16 Election 2004 Election 2006 Election 2008 Election 2010 Election 2016 Elena Kagan Elitism Embryonic Stem Cell Research End Times? English language Enhanced Interrogation Erosion of Rights Eucharist Euthanasia Exorcism Extraordinary Synod Facebook Faith Faith and Reason Faith Friday Faith Perspective Faithful Friday Fascism Again Fascism in America Fatima FCC Feminism Film First Things Forgiveness Fr. James Martin Francis and Islam Francis in America Frassati Fred Thompson Free Speech? Freedom of Worship FutureChurch Global Pandemic GOP Congress Haiti Head Covering Health Care Here and Queer Hermits Heroes Hitchens Holy Spirit Holy Week '09 Holy Week '10 Hoo-Hah & BS Hoo-Hah & BS Icons Illegal Immigration In The Arena Interviews Interwebz Iran Uprising Iraqi Christians ISIL ISIS Islamic State Islamification/Islamofascism Islamification/Islamofascism Isra-El It's all about me! Me! ME! James Burke Jerry Lewis Jesus Christ Joblessness John Boehner John McCain John Paul II John XXIII Juan Williams Just Words Katrina/Rita King is a Fink Latin Mass Leadership Lectio Divina Lent Lent '08 Lent '09 Lent 2010 Lent 2011 Limbaugh Listen to Lizzie Litigious Society Liturgy Liturgy of the Hours Mainstream Media Manliness Marriage Mary Media Excess Medical Merton Michelle Obama Mighty John O' Connor Misc. Miss Ella Missionaries Mitt Romney Monasticism My brother S My Irish Aunties Mystic Monks Nanny Statism Nature NEA Neri New Media Newman Noonan Notre Dame NPR Stuff Nun News Obama Bad? Obama Good? Obama White House Oil Spill Online Retreat '08 Online Retreat Days Oratory Orthodoxy Our Hillary! Parenting Passionists Patheos Patheos Book Club Patrons Paul Ryan Penance Penn Jillette Philosophy PJTV Podcasts Poetry Politics-free zone Pop Culture Pope Emeritus Pope Francis Prayer Predictions Priesthood Pro-Life Public Sector Unions Purgatory Questions about Catholicism Quotes of the Day Quoting the News Race in America rants Recipes Remarried Catholics Reposts by request Retreat thoughts Rome Rudy Giuliani Russia Saints Sarah Palin Scandal Scott Brown SCOTUS Scriptural stuff Secularism Send in the clowns Serving up hot links Sexuality Sherrod Shroud of Turin Sisters and Nuns Social Entrepreneurship Social Media Social Security Socialism doesn't work Sports and Faith Stem Cells Strange Gods Suffering Synod Tea Parties Tea Party Terri Schiavo The 9/11 Commission The Catholic Answer The Constitution The Desert The Fourth Estate The Pelosi The Perpetual Adolescents The Rosary Third Party? Timothy Dolan Touch of evil TSA Tsunami TV/Pop Culture/Music TV/Pop Culture/Music Twitter Uncategorized Unemployment Unintended Consequences US Military Vaginal Musings Vatican Vespers video faves Vile Joe Biden Voter Fraud War by Litigation War on Terror War, What it good for? Why can't weeee be ... World Youth Days Year of Faith Year of the Priest

Select a Month August 2016 July 2016 April 2016 March 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who led a rebellion called "the men of Belial" against David near his end?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Amasa Sheba son of Bichri Adonijah Absalom