Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

The Anchoress

Home
Catholic
Coupla interesting pieces on Journalism

Coupla interesting pieces on Journalism

Last updated on: March 16, 2017 at 7:02 pm by Elizabeth Scalia

Coupla interesting pieces on Journalism 2017-03-16T19:02:48+00:00 Elizabeth Scalia

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

And no, it’s not just me sitting here snarking at journalists! There are several pieces out there on the current state and future of Journalism, and I think they’re all interesting and important in one way or another.

Doug at Bogus Gold links to this Jay Rosen piece on a recent J-School professor’s convention:

Next was Dianne Lynch, dean of the School of Communications at Ithaca College…She told us a startling story about an exceptional student who gave up a four-year scholarship worth over $200,000, including tuition, room and board, even travel money. The student came to the dean’s office to let Lynch know that she was quitting journalism and switching to sociology. “I decided that I just can’t be in such a terrible profession,” the student said, adding that it did not seem to her a field where a young person could “make a difference.”

There was a slight gasp in the room at that. This was because the phrase used, “make a difference,” though tedious and vague, was once the very thing that identified to journalists their own idealism. You didn’t do it for the money, and it wasn’t the wonderful working conditions, or a chance for advancement. For a certain generation (whose mortality was lurking about the panel, way under the laughs) journalism, at its best, was all about “making a difference.” Speaking truth to power, and all that implies.

But for one of Ithaca College’s best students this was a joke. Lynch to crowd: “she gave up a $200,000 scholarship just to get out of journalism.” We let that sink in. To learn, when you are ready to pass the torch, that some of the best and the brightest don’t want your torch, because they think it went out a while ago, counts as a sad day for J-schoolers of a certain generation.

The Rosen piece is well-worth reading. I like Doug’s observation, as well: Journalism schools are struggling with the ability to replace that kind of animating mission with something else. “Just report the news,” seems more like a craft than a profession. Yet so many of the presumed pillars of the profession aren’t standing the test of time.

Maybe it’s time to bring back cub reporters – people who are in the profession because they love to write and they love to tell a story. It seems to me so many of the press’ problems would go away if they would simply get back to reporting news, rather than trying to “frame” it. You know – let good news BE “good news,” stop “framing” it with the everpresent, negative BUT… and tell the anchors to stop reporting such stories with a grimace that suggests they need a dose of magnesia.

Mary Katharine Ham has a look at the press memo heard ’round the world

Yost’s column set off a wicked firestorm on Poynter. He garnered what could only charitably be called undiplomatic criticism from an editor of the Columbia Journalism Review, the Washington editor for Knight-Ridder newspapers, which owns the Pioneer Press, and the director of the Knight-Ridder Baghdad bureau, among many others.

This week, the Minnesota-based bloggers at PowerLine, got their hands on a leaked internal memo instructing the staff of the Press to cover more aspects of the war. The paper, the memo states, is strong on covering the deaths of soldiers and weaker on covering the more mundane details of the war, the reconstruction, and how they affect families on the homefront.

Austin Bay is looking at how the AP’s rather negatively slanted Iraq coverage is being re-evaluated, which is news I am grateful to hear. Jack Kelly seems to have something of a companion piece to it wherein he opines:

I’m not impressed with the argument that journalists can’t report positive news because it is so hard to get around the country. More reporters can embed with U.S. forces. (There are only about three dozen embeds now, down from around 700 during Operation Iraqi Freedom).

Congress and the Pentagon could make it easier for regional newspapers to send embeds by permitting journalists who are embedded with U.S. units to buy Servicemen’s Group Life Insurance. My paper has balked at sending me back to Iraq because of the high price of hazard insurance. If we could buy insurance at the same rate as the GIs do, more of us would go.

An interesting idea. A thing is always doable if you want to do it badly enough. Didn’t Giuliani solve a problem of underinsured citizens by putting allowing them to sign onto a gov’t employee health plan? I believe he did.

Cathy Seipp covers a new documentary on 9/11 which sounds very promising, and which she says mostly manages to stay objective, although she details a press conference about the thing that reveals a great deal.

I don’t much like the tone of this piece in the Canada Free Press, but it does make a point that is worth looking at

It seems that some members of the former mainstream media are suffering from a serious bout of amnesia. Last week CNN ran a promo for its “Situation Room” program, hosted by Wolf Blitzer, their Washington correspondent. The promo posed the question: “What would Clinton do… about AIDS, Africa, terrorism…?”

Stop and think about that for a moment. Does anyone really believe – for one second – that, were President Clinton in office, CNN would be doing a piece called “What Would George Herbert Walker Bush Do?” Does anyone think, for one moment, that if Hillary Clinton were president, CNN would be asking “What Would W Do?”

The truth is, a lot of journalism’s current problems can be summed up thusly: they are completely owned by their infatuations with Bill and Hillary Clinton, and their hatred of most members of the Bush family. And you know what? That’s not Bill or Hillary’s fault, or the Bush family’s fault. It is the fault of the journalists who have lost control of their own objectivity, and thus their credibility – and that is largely the fault of the editors and publishers who became disinterested in reining their people in, or in clearly outlining a committment to objectivity.

Journalists complain about bloggers – that they are amateurish (yes, we are, most of us – unless we’re trained in the craft), that they are biased (well, yes we are, but we’re also up front about it) and that we’re too quick to find fault and harp on them. That might be true. But the thing is…when I read a Mo Dowd or Frank Rich column lately, I find myself wanting to bathe and disinfect afterwards, because their writing – no matter what the subject – always, always, always comes down to “and I hate that bastard George W. Bush so much!” It is a festering, ugly sort of hatred – you feel the pus dripping down from the page and onto your hands- and I always end up thinking…yes, some bloggers on both sides are ridiculous and hateful. But they are amateurs. We are, most of us, amateurs. These people – the Dowds, the Riches, the Ivenses, the Thomases, the Krugmans and the Cohens, are professional journalists spewing this sort of one-sided, myopic, completely closed-minded hate.

If journalism wants to redeem itself, regain some credibility and attract bright, energetic writers, perhaps it needs to rein it its passions a bit, stop continually writing from a place of hate or love and begin to re-embrace objectivity. Or, if not “clean” objectivity, which is perhaps not even possible in an era of blogs and 24 hour news, at least a move to moderation. Can the press still, consciously, force itself to be moderately – rather than stridently – biased? I think that should be do-able. And yes…a thing is always doable if you want it badly enough.

I doubt anyone with a bit of intellectual honesty would try to claim that John Kerry was looked at objectively in 2004. The press carried 3/4’s of his campaign on their shoulders, and never questioned itself about it. They are even now preparing to carry fully 7/8’s of Hillary Clinton’s campaign on their shoulders (with some quick lifting for Bill into the UN.) I would urge the press to re-think that plan. If journalists reduce themselves to being nothing more than the incurious, puff-ball-questioning, obsequious deliverers of a uniquely ambitious person to the White House, they will have assisted in their own demise, utterly shredding their credibility and reducing their once-noble profession to the role of second-water-carrier. And in doing so, they will be precipitating something unhealthy.

No president should ever “own” the press. As much as I sometimes despair over the incessant pounding Bush is handed by the fourth estate, it is at least better than seeing the press throw hearts and flowers at candidates – working toward delivering a starry-eyed victory over delivering the truth…all of which reminds me of nothing so much as Pravda on Prozac.

Co-incidently, neo-neocon is also writing about the fourth estate, as is Michelle. Serendipitous?

The Fourth Estate

Previous Post

August 16, 2005

Carol's looking for the quiet

Next Post

August 16, 2005 Let us storm heaven...

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category "Remaking" Ourselves 'Remaking' America 9/10 Mindset 9/11 trials Abortion ACORN Adoration Advent Advent 2008 Advent 2009 Advent 2010 Alternative Energy Alternative Media America American Catholic Church American Church American Genius Ameridolatry ANCHORESS BOOKSHELF Anglican-Roman Reconciliation Answers & Questions Anti_Semitism Archbishop Hilarion Ayn Rand Bad Mass Barack Obama Baseball Benedict Benedict & Islam Benedict in UK Benedict XVI Benedictine Bill Whittle Birth Control Blogs and Blogging Blogs and Blogging Bloodless Coup Bobby Jindal Bookchat Breitbart Bride at every wedding... Bride at every wedding... Buckley Bullies Bush Bad? Bush Good Buster Capitalism Catholic Fiction Catholic Vocations Catholicism Celibacy Chaput Charitable Stuff Chesterton Chile Chris Christie Christians in Exile Christine O' Donnell Christmas Christmas Gift Ideas Church Hates Science? Church hates women Communion of Saints Compline Conclave 2013 Confession Constitutional Stuff Conversion Crisis & Opportunity Critical Thinking Crooks and Liars Crucible of Faith Cuba Culture of Life Culture of Life/Death Culture of Treason? Dancing Death Dialogue re Islam Dick Meyer Divorce and Remarriage DOJ Domestic Terrorism Dominican Order Don't try me too high Dowd Dumb Democrat moves Dumb GOP moves Economic woe Education Egregious Harry Reid Elder Son Elder Son's Sweet Girlfriend Elderly Election '10 Election '12 Election '16 Election 2004 Election 2006 Election 2008 Election 2010 Election 2016 Elena Kagan Elitism Embryonic Stem Cell Research End Times? English language Enhanced Interrogation Erosion of Rights Eucharist Euthanasia Exorcism Extraordinary Synod Facebook Faith Faith and Reason Faith Friday Faith Perspective Faithful Friday Fascism Again Fascism in America Fatima FCC Feminism Film First Things Forgiveness Fr. James Martin Francis and Islam Francis in America Frassati Fred Thompson Free Speech? Freedom of Worship FutureChurch Global Pandemic GOP Congress Haiti Head Covering Health Care Here and Queer Hermits Heroes Hitchens Holy Spirit Holy Week '09 Holy Week '10 Hoo-Hah & BS Hoo-Hah & BS Icons Illegal Immigration In The Arena Interviews Interwebz Iran Uprising Iraqi Christians ISIL ISIS Islamic State Islamification/Islamofascism Islamification/Islamofascism Isra-El It's all about me! Me! ME! James Burke Jerry Lewis Jesus Christ Joblessness John Boehner John McCain John Paul II John XXIII Juan Williams Just Words Katrina/Rita King is a Fink Latin Mass Leadership Lectio Divina Lent Lent '08 Lent '09 Lent 2010 Lent 2011 Limbaugh Listen to Lizzie Litigious Society Liturgy Liturgy of the Hours Mainstream Media Manliness Marriage Mary Media Excess Medical Merton Michelle Obama Mighty John O' Connor Misc. Miss Ella Missionaries Mitt Romney Monasticism My brother S My Irish Aunties Mystic Monks Nanny Statism Nature NEA Neri New Media Newman Noonan Notre Dame NPR Stuff Nun News Obama Bad? Obama Good? Obama White House Oil Spill Online Retreat '08 Online Retreat Days Oratory Orthodoxy Our Hillary! Parenting Passionists Patheos Patheos Book Club Patrons Paul Ryan Penance Penn Jillette Philosophy PJTV Podcasts Poetry Politics-free zone Pop Culture Pope Emeritus Pope Francis Prayer Predictions Priesthood Pro-Life Public Sector Unions Purgatory Questions about Catholicism Quotes of the Day Quoting the News Race in America rants Recipes Remarried Catholics Reposts by request Retreat thoughts Rome Rudy Giuliani Russia Saints Sarah Palin Scandal Scott Brown SCOTUS Scriptural stuff Secularism Send in the clowns Serving up hot links Sexuality Sherrod Shroud of Turin Sisters and Nuns Social Entrepreneurship Social Media Social Security Socialism doesn't work Sports and Faith Stem Cells Strange Gods Suffering Synod Tea Parties Tea Party Terri Schiavo The 9/11 Commission The Catholic Answer The Constitution The Desert The Fourth Estate The Pelosi The Perpetual Adolescents The Rosary Third Party? Timothy Dolan Touch of evil TSA Tsunami TV/Pop Culture/Music TV/Pop Culture/Music Twitter Uncategorized Unemployment Unintended Consequences US Military Vaginal Musings Vatican Vespers video faves Vile Joe Biden Voter Fraud War by Litigation War on Terror War, What it good for? Why can't weeee be ... World Youth Days Year of Faith Year of the Priest

Select a Month August 2016 July 2016 April 2016 March 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Barnabas" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Son of Encouragement Servant of the Lord God is my help The Chosen One