Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

The Anchoress

Home
Catholic
Grunt, Grunt, “Us Good, Them Bad” Snort, Snort

Grunt, Grunt, “Us Good, Them Bad” Snort, Snort

Last updated on: March 16, 2017 at 5:16 pm by Elizabeth Scalia

Grunt, Grunt, “Us Good, Them Bad” Snort, Snort 2017-03-16T17:16:50+00:00 Elizabeth Scalia

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

That’s the sound of political discourse in the United States of America, in the year of our Lord, 2005. It is a rude sound and an unsophisticated philosophy, and it has – sadly – infected large numbers of people in both political parties.

On the left, that sound is the sound of people who utterly refuse to find one positive thing in George W. Bush, or to give him the benefit of the doubt on any issue, any at all. Any charge brought against him is immediately “credible and true,” and his humanity is completely discounted. He has become so demonized that he is no longer a human being to these people. He is something to hate. And hate…as we all know…is easy.

Conversely, they utterly refuse to allow any criticism whatsoever, no matter how temperate or constructive, against the Clinton Administration. Every charge is “trumped up,” every word uttered by a “Clintonista” is “credible and true.”

On the right, that sound is the sound of people who utterly refuse to find one positive thing in Bill Clinton, or to give him the benefit of the doubt on any issue, any at all. Any charge brought against him is immediately “credible and true,” and his humanity is completely discounted. He has become so demonized, that he is no longer a human being to these people. He is something to hate. And hate…as we all know…is easy.

Conversely, they utterly refuse to allow any criticism whatsoever, no matter how temperate or constructive, against the Bush Administration. Every charge is “trumped up,” every word uttered by a “Bushie” is “credible and true.”

People, people, people…this has got to stop. I am calling for a time-out. Everyone back in the sandboxes and listen up for a second!

Admittedly, there are some – hopefully many – in both parties who have not completely absorbed the “Grunting Philosophy,” who are able to look at a news story with some small amount of objectivity, who do not immediately spring into heated rhetoric. But…I’d say most of them are not blogging. :-)

I will admit that sometimes, on the blogs, it is extremely easy to get caught up in the heat of things. You read something and it irks you, particularly if the press seems to be “framing” a story instead of just telling it, then you read a few comments that are rude and obnoxious, and you feel your blood pressure rising, your jaw tenses up and you bang out an intemperate response that, were you face-to-face with your adversary, you might have either held back or made more carefully, and diplomatically. Because it is easy to lose your cool and not be in control. Discipline is more difficult. It is easy to be a hothead, and I know it, because I am an Irish one, myself. It is easy to be cynical, and not subject yourself to a charge of naivete’. It is easy to follow the lead of a mob, and easy – so easy – to hate. Oh, it is so much easier to hate than it is to love.

Chesteron said it is easy to be hard; hard to be light.

I can say all of this because I myself, to my shame, have now and then gotten caught up in it. Not for nothing did my friend Joe Marshall once refer to me as a “glittering holy terror when annoyed.” (Friend? But Anchoress, he’s a liberal, and a really, really staunch, Bush-hating one.)

Yeah, he is. But he’s my friend, too. Politically we agree on almost nothing, and we never will, but we have found a way to respect each other, even though Joe is vastly better educated than I, and I am vastly prettier than he.

Lyle, who comments here often, keeps dropping me emails telling me that he does not understand how we can be friendly, because he disagrees with every word I write. But we’ve developed a warm and surprisingly intimate sort of emailing pen-pal relationship.

In the past few days, I have had the pleasure of corresponding with a few liberals who will never, never, never move from their positions and who disagree with me and will for ages unto ages, amen. And each time we correspond successfully, and the civility between missives holds, I pray.

I pray that simple civil discourse can somehow enter into the arena of politics, that invective will lose its charms for some, and frenzied, overwrought political theatrics – whether they involve Randall Terry hanging around the Schindler family in Florida or the agenda-movers surrounding Mrs. Sheehan, in Texas – can be shut down like the bad farces they are.

I’ve been praying for it a lot, this week, because I really am becoming quite worried. The blogs are becoming powerful political forces, and as such, I am thinking that we who manage them must find a way to promote civility in our intra-blog discourses and in our commenters. If political parties on both sides cannot move beyond hands-over-the-ears-la-la-la-I-can’t-hear-you, you freakish #*&@* echo chambering, if people do not put the brakes on the “Grunting Philosophy,” the blogosphere, and perhaps the nation, may yet eat its own heart out.

In the desert
I saw a creature, naked, bestial,
Who, squatting upon the ground,
Held his heart in his hands,
And ate of it.
I said, “Is it good, friend?”
“It is bitter – bitter”, he answered,
“But I like it
Because it is bitter,
And because it is my heart.”
– Stephen Crane

I think the blogs can be a force for either building up dialogue and serious debate, or for hastening the devolution of political give-and-take in America. And I am beginning to feel, strongly, that if we bloggers can help re-build constructive discourse, we need to begin to undertake such re-building now. There is not a moment to waste.

The two stories that are getting the most blog-play today, throughout the so-called blogosphere are the stories about the utter failure of the the 9/11 Commission to play straight with information that came to them, and which would have materially changed their final report, and the story of Mrs. Sheehan. I am not going to expound on the details of either case – if you are reading this, you can google and technorati as well as I can, and you can see the lines drawn on both sides, for yourself.

What I am going to do is ask the blogs – both sides – (which are, contrary to the opinion of some managed by mostly intelligent, educated people) to take both stories and eliminate the noise, eliminate the knee-jerk suspicions and raised eyebrows. I’m asking the blogs to suppress the urge to bellow at “those fiends!” on the “other side” of each story and consider what the story, finally, means for America. I’m asking the bloggers to, having hacked through the clinging vines, obfuscation and media frames and narratives, look at the very serious and fundamental questions that exist within each story.

In the Able Danger story, let us ask this: Aside from all of the political noise and hyperventilation, the 9/11 Commission now admits that it actually omitted from its final report information that illustrated a specific failure in intelligence gathering that – had it been included – would have materially changed the thrust and tenor of its report, and seriously called into question a rather bold conflict-of-interest involving a panel member. Since the 9/11 Commission admits it, and has thereby destroyed the credibility of its own report, is it not in the interest of the country to determine how, and by whom, the decision to omit this finding came to be, considering the Commission’s cost to the nation in terms of both hard dollars and public angst? We can stipulate that neither President Clinton nor President Bush “caused” 9/11. With that stipulation, can we join together to call for an investigation that is in the best interests of the country?

As to the Sheehan story, the question is a simple one made more difficult by the extreme emotional foundation of the story, and it is this: Beyond the emotion, beyond the spin which – it must be acknowledged – is quite possibly a help and an amusement to the very people who killed Casey Sheehan, people who would be frankly delighted to see America pull out of Iraq and render the deaths of 1800 soldiers and thousands of Iraqi citizens utterly meaningless, beyond all of that, what will a second meeting with President Bush bring to Mrs. Sheehan that the first meeting did not, why does she need a second meeting when other grieving mothers and fathers seem content with one, and how are her words and actions affecting the morale and safety of the 100,000 other young men and women who are still in Iraq?

Those are the questions – all the rest of it is sound and fury, signifying nothing.

The blogosphere is fun, and fast, and furious and funny, fierce and frenzied – it can be a tremendous boon, but not if – in the course of our dashed-off conceits and constructs, we lose sight of each other’s humanity. What I saw today – on many different blogs, both liberal and conservative – were commentors (or emailers) who crossed clear lines of simple decency, with no suggestions that they “rein it in” from blog-hosts. In several cases, bloggers under particularly vicious attack felt they had no recourse but to threaten to go after their attacker’s livelihoods, as the emailers and commenters had launched their attacks from their places of business. Having read the vituperative emails, I cannot say I blame the bloggers for doing so, but on the other hand, when we’ve reached that point, when such clear lines are routinely crossed and the victims of the invective feel that action must be taken which can prove very severe, then things are literally like dried tinder waiting for the right spark – a dangerous situation.

So, really – there are two more questions:

Bloggers need to ask themselves if their rhetoric is so inflammatory and undisciplined that it could possibly inspire a hateful spark that could mean danger for another human being. Blog commenters need to ask themselves if they are ready to pay for a fast unleashing of pent up hate and frustration with their jobs or their liberty.

There is no excuse for writing to anyone using vulgar language. If it is all you can do, then restrain yourself – go get a cup of coffee and calm down. And there is no excuse for blogging like Al Pacino on crack.

I once heard Peggy Noonan on a panel show say “Decent people may disagree and still be decent people!” I have never forgotten that, because it was so obvious, and so true, and yet…

Earlier this week, the “noise” of various media almost made me shut down. And then I remembered Ms. Noonan’s words, and I committed myself, then and there, to promoting civility – as much as a hotheaded Irishwoman can (there is that genetic limitation, you know) and to reminding visitors to my site, at least, that decent people may disagree, and still be decent people.

Luckily for me, I have some very excellent readers from every side of the spectrum, and from every religious gang, too. Decent people, all. We all can be. Shall we try? I am ready to pledge myself to it. I hope other bloggers will, too.

UPDATE: And…I guess…some will not.

Blogs and Blogging

Previous Post

August 11, 2005

Varifrank responds to Mrs. Sheehan

Next Post

August 12, 2005 Ah, now that's lovely

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category "Remaking" Ourselves 'Remaking' America 9/10 Mindset 9/11 trials Abortion ACORN Adoration Advent Advent 2008 Advent 2009 Advent 2010 Alternative Energy Alternative Media America American Catholic Church American Church American Genius Ameridolatry ANCHORESS BOOKSHELF Anglican-Roman Reconciliation Answers & Questions Anti_Semitism Archbishop Hilarion Ayn Rand Bad Mass Barack Obama Baseball Benedict Benedict & Islam Benedict in UK Benedict XVI Benedictine Bill Whittle Birth Control Blogs and Blogging Blogs and Blogging Bloodless Coup Bobby Jindal Bookchat Breitbart Bride at every wedding... Bride at every wedding... Buckley Bullies Bush Bad? Bush Good Buster Capitalism Catholic Fiction Catholic Vocations Catholicism Celibacy Chaput Charitable Stuff Chesterton Chile Chris Christie Christians in Exile Christine O' Donnell Christmas Christmas Gift Ideas Church Hates Science? Church hates women Communion of Saints Compline Conclave 2013 Confession Constitutional Stuff Conversion Crisis & Opportunity Critical Thinking Crooks and Liars Crucible of Faith Cuba Culture of Life Culture of Life/Death Culture of Treason? Dancing Death Dialogue re Islam Dick Meyer Divorce and Remarriage DOJ Domestic Terrorism Dominican Order Don't try me too high Dowd Dumb Democrat moves Dumb GOP moves Economic woe Education Egregious Harry Reid Elder Son Elder Son's Sweet Girlfriend Elderly Election '10 Election '12 Election '16 Election 2004 Election 2006 Election 2008 Election 2010 Election 2016 Elena Kagan Elitism Embryonic Stem Cell Research End Times? English language Enhanced Interrogation Erosion of Rights Eucharist Euthanasia Exorcism Extraordinary Synod Facebook Faith Faith and Reason Faith Friday Faith Perspective Faithful Friday Fascism Again Fascism in America Fatima FCC Feminism Film First Things Forgiveness Fr. James Martin Francis and Islam Francis in America Frassati Fred Thompson Free Speech? Freedom of Worship FutureChurch Global Pandemic GOP Congress Haiti Head Covering Health Care Here and Queer Hermits Heroes Hitchens Holy Spirit Holy Week '09 Holy Week '10 Hoo-Hah & BS Hoo-Hah & BS Icons Illegal Immigration In The Arena Interviews Interwebz Iran Uprising Iraqi Christians ISIL ISIS Islamic State Islamification/Islamofascism Islamification/Islamofascism Isra-El It's all about me! Me! ME! James Burke Jerry Lewis Jesus Christ Joblessness John Boehner John McCain John Paul II John XXIII Juan Williams Just Words Katrina/Rita King is a Fink Latin Mass Leadership Lectio Divina Lent Lent '08 Lent '09 Lent 2010 Lent 2011 Limbaugh Listen to Lizzie Litigious Society Liturgy Liturgy of the Hours Mainstream Media Manliness Marriage Mary Media Excess Medical Merton Michelle Obama Mighty John O' Connor Misc. Miss Ella Missionaries Mitt Romney Monasticism My brother S My Irish Aunties Mystic Monks Nanny Statism Nature NEA Neri New Media Newman Noonan Notre Dame NPR Stuff Nun News Obama Bad? Obama Good? Obama White House Oil Spill Online Retreat '08 Online Retreat Days Oratory Orthodoxy Our Hillary! Parenting Passionists Patheos Patheos Book Club Patrons Paul Ryan Penance Penn Jillette Philosophy PJTV Podcasts Poetry Politics-free zone Pop Culture Pope Emeritus Pope Francis Prayer Predictions Priesthood Pro-Life Public Sector Unions Purgatory Questions about Catholicism Quotes of the Day Quoting the News Race in America rants Recipes Remarried Catholics Reposts by request Retreat thoughts Rome Rudy Giuliani Russia Saints Sarah Palin Scandal Scott Brown SCOTUS Scriptural stuff Secularism Send in the clowns Serving up hot links Sexuality Sherrod Shroud of Turin Sisters and Nuns Social Entrepreneurship Social Media Social Security Socialism doesn't work Sports and Faith Stem Cells Strange Gods Suffering Synod Tea Parties Tea Party Terri Schiavo The 9/11 Commission The Catholic Answer The Constitution The Desert The Fourth Estate The Pelosi The Perpetual Adolescents The Rosary Third Party? Timothy Dolan Touch of evil TSA Tsunami TV/Pop Culture/Music TV/Pop Culture/Music Twitter Uncategorized Unemployment Unintended Consequences US Military Vaginal Musings Vatican Vespers video faves Vile Joe Biden Voter Fraud War by Litigation War on Terror War, What it good for? Why can't weeee be ... World Youth Days Year of Faith Year of the Priest

Select a Month August 2016 July 2016 April 2016 March 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Tamar" mean in Hebrew?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Palm tree The Lord is my refuge My delight Daughter of the King