Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

The Anchoress

Home
Catholic
Playing the Catholic card AND the Gay Card?

Playing the Catholic card AND the Gay Card?

Last updated on: March 13, 2015 at 8:46 pm by Elizabeth Scalia

Playing the Catholic card AND the Gay Card? 2015-03-13T20:46:18+00:00 Elizabeth Scalia

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I noticed this yesterday on Ann Althouse’s blog and I was really hoping it would just go away, that we wouldn’t have to see the Democrats and some on the left once again bring themselves to the edge of something truly ugly by playing the “gay, gay, gay” card. But I should have known better. And this time, the left is going to really out-do itself, by the way, because they’re not only going to whisper “gay,” as they do often, they’re going to do it while playing the Catholic card. That’s right, they’re trying for a two-fer.

In other words…they have nothing on John Roberts, they cannot really attack him on his qualifications or his record. So they are going to go after his religion and his wife, and while they’re at it, they’re going to start “gay” rumors, because…well…because they still think we care. As usual, they project their identity politics onto their opponents, because it is what obsesses most of them, and they can’t believe it does not obsess most of us.

From the beginning: President Bush introduces John Roberts to the press and the world. Some liberals and Democrats immediately assume that because Mrs. Roberts looks a bit anguished at the mention of their son, Jack, “he must be gay, let’s look into Jack!”. Upon learning that Jack is a four-year-old breakdance wannabe, they pull back a little, look at the blondness of these children, and begin to wonder why these blonde, “aryan” children were adopted from South America.

Then, WaPo’s Robin Givhan, who is probably paid pretty well for superficial crap like this makes withering, unnecessary and small remarks about the manner in which Mrs. Roberts dresses her children:

In a time when most children are dressed in Gap Kids and retailers of similar price-point and modernity, the parents put young master Jack in an ensemble that calls to mind John F. “John-John” Kennedy Jr.

Got that? The whole tone of her piece is that by dressing their children in (what I thought was) a very cute manner the Roberts are signalling either that they are climbers, or that they are hopelessly retrograde (hint: that’s code for “uncool and anti-abortion”).

Hmmm, I wonder what Ms. Givhans would have said about me back when I (still quite the raging liberal Democrat) dressed Buster like this:

Awww…I do love that shot!

Anyway, so now the Roberts not-gay-but-adopted-and-maybe-aryan-son-and-daughter have been used for about all their worth, right?

Well, no. Because John Roberts and his wife married in their forties (gasp!) and…and…they couldn’t have children of their own!!! But why not assign a simple explanation to their sad infertility, for example, the very common one that very often power couples who waited to establish their careers before settling down sometimes find themselves infertile?

Too simple, too naive, no, no…Roberts and his wife married late and adopted children because…wait for it…he must be gay! He must be gay! He must be gay! His son isn’t but he must be! GAY!

As if…you know…there is (suddenly) something wrong with that! Oh, but I forget, if a conservative is gay, like Mary Cheney or Rick Santorum’s spokesman, then there is something wrong with that, there is!

Not that I am saying Roberts is gay. Quite the contrary, I married a man who went to an all-boys Catholic school (on a scholarship) wrestled, and worked on school plays, and posed for “all guy” pictures at our wedding. Oh, and my Mother-in-Law (bless her) did dress him in atrocious plaid pants in the late 60’s and early 70’s, just like everyone else’s mother did.

As Charmaine Yoest points out:

Just a caution for my male readers: if there are any extant photos of you from the ’70’s in plaid pants, better get rid of them now. And it’s not just the evidence of questionable fashion sense. Apparently now that’s the goods on being gay.

Call it the Mary Cheney Strategy. Call it desperation. Some on the Left have started a “maybe he’s gay” whisper campaign against John Roberts…Of course it is the height of hypocrisy for the (allegedly) pro-tolerance crowd to start questioning someone’s sexual preference. It’s a strange and twisted tactic for those who are allied with the gay rights movement to try to make an issue out of someone supposedly being gay.

Who cares?

Well, that’s just the point: they think we do.

Yup.

But wait, there’s MORE!

While the “gay” campaign is swirling its way up from the fever-swamps, Mrs. Roberts is also being hyper-scrutinzed for daring to be pro-life and, you know, not dressing right. Because, as I said just a couple days ago, not all but too many of these folks on the left – and the press – simply do not care if their words, actions or suppositions affect the families of those they do not like. They seem not to want to consider common humanity and decency as they scurry about looking for ways to undermine a man’s career.

I can’t remember ever seeing another SCOTUS nominee’s spouse being rigorously looked into, can you?

Then, of course, there is Chuck Schumer (I kick myself every day for voting for him instead of D’Amato!) who loves nothing more than to sing the “your deeply held beliefs are cause for concern” dirge. I am loath to call anyone a bigot, but I do start to wonder about Sen. Schumer. He certainly does seem to have a problem with Catholics and, as Hugh Hewitt points out, Schumer is about to mount an all out assault on the Roberts’ religious beliefs. Which is just deplorable.

But then Schumer and his pals on the committee have had a little practice on this. Recall that when Bill Pryor was put before them, Schumer and Diane Feinstein and the rest had a field day carrying on about his faith…and now that I think about it…they also used the occasion to play a gay card, albeit a homophobic one. “Tell us again why you decided not to take your children to Walt Disney World during Gay Days, Mr. Pryor…(isn’t it true it’s because you’re a hater and a homophobe????)

So, there you have it, be prepared. For some on the left (and please note how carefully I keep saying “some” on the left. I know there are folks on that side who must be appalled at all this…at least I hope there are!) the issue is already a “settled” thing. Roberts is gay, his wife is his beard, his children are the spawn of Nazis who have been hiding out in Brazil, they hate gays, they want to turn the clock back to 1950 and bring women into back alleys for abortions, oh, and….(sneer) they’re “devout Catholics” who want nothing less than to bring Pope Benedict XVI into the Congress where he can dance on the ovaries and uterai of all of those self-aborting women who will be dead by the thousands, this time next year, if John Roberts is confirmed to the Supreme Court of the United States.

That about cover it?

Also blogging on all or parts of this: Hugh Hewitt
Ann Althouse
Charmaine Yoest
Red State.org
Lorie Byrd
Dirty Harry
Closed Cafeteria
Mary Katharine Ham
Charlotte Allen
Charlotte Hays
Hoystory
Locker Room
Wuzzadem
Betsy Newmark
Michelle Malkin
Kerfuffles
Gullyborg

Dumb Democrat moves

The Perpetual Adolescents

Previous Post

July 22, 2005

A "screw abstinence" party. The mind reels

Next Post

July 23, 2005 Marriage in Temporary Vows

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category "Remaking" Ourselves 'Remaking' America 9/10 Mindset 9/11 trials Abortion ACORN Adoration Advent Advent 2008 Advent 2009 Advent 2010 Alternative Energy Alternative Media America American Catholic Church American Church American Genius Ameridolatry ANCHORESS BOOKSHELF Anglican-Roman Reconciliation Answers & Questions Anti_Semitism Archbishop Hilarion Ayn Rand Bad Mass Barack Obama Baseball Benedict Benedict & Islam Benedict in UK Benedict XVI Benedictine Bill Whittle Birth Control Blogs and Blogging Blogs and Blogging Bloodless Coup Bobby Jindal Bookchat Breitbart Bride at every wedding... Bride at every wedding... Buckley Bullies Bush Bad? Bush Good Buster Capitalism Catholic Fiction Catholic Vocations Catholicism Celibacy Chaput Charitable Stuff Chesterton Chile Chris Christie Christians in Exile Christine O' Donnell Christmas Christmas Gift Ideas Church Hates Science? Church hates women Communion of Saints Compline Conclave 2013 Confession Constitutional Stuff Conversion Crisis & Opportunity Critical Thinking Crooks and Liars Crucible of Faith Cuba Culture of Life Culture of Life/Death Culture of Treason? Dancing Death Dialogue re Islam Dick Meyer Divorce and Remarriage DOJ Domestic Terrorism Dominican Order Don't try me too high Dowd Dumb Democrat moves Dumb GOP moves Economic woe Education Egregious Harry Reid Elder Son Elder Son's Sweet Girlfriend Elderly Election '10 Election '12 Election '16 Election 2004 Election 2006 Election 2008 Election 2010 Election 2016 Elena Kagan Elitism Embryonic Stem Cell Research End Times? English language Enhanced Interrogation Erosion of Rights Eucharist Euthanasia Exorcism Extraordinary Synod Facebook Faith Faith and Reason Faith Friday Faith Perspective Faithful Friday Fascism Again Fascism in America Fatima FCC Feminism Film First Things Forgiveness Fr. James Martin Francis and Islam Francis in America Frassati Fred Thompson Free Speech? Freedom of Worship FutureChurch Global Pandemic GOP Congress Haiti Head Covering Health Care Here and Queer Hermits Heroes Hitchens Holy Spirit Holy Week '09 Holy Week '10 Hoo-Hah & BS Hoo-Hah & BS Icons Illegal Immigration In The Arena Interviews Interwebz Iran Uprising Iraqi Christians ISIL ISIS Islamic State Islamification/Islamofascism Islamification/Islamofascism Isra-El It's all about me! Me! ME! James Burke Jerry Lewis Jesus Christ Joblessness John Boehner John McCain John Paul II John XXIII Juan Williams Just Words Katrina/Rita King is a Fink Latin Mass Leadership Lectio Divina Lent Lent '08 Lent '09 Lent 2010 Lent 2011 Limbaugh Listen to Lizzie Litigious Society Liturgy Liturgy of the Hours Mainstream Media Manliness Marriage Mary Media Excess Medical Merton Michelle Obama Mighty John O' Connor Misc. Miss Ella Missionaries Mitt Romney Monasticism My brother S My Irish Aunties Mystic Monks Nanny Statism Nature NEA Neri New Media Newman Noonan Notre Dame NPR Stuff Nun News Obama Bad? Obama Good? Obama White House Oil Spill Online Retreat '08 Online Retreat Days Oratory Orthodoxy Our Hillary! Parenting Passionists Patheos Patheos Book Club Patrons Paul Ryan Penance Penn Jillette Philosophy PJTV Podcasts Poetry Politics-free zone Pop Culture Pope Emeritus Pope Francis Prayer Predictions Priesthood Pro-Life Public Sector Unions Purgatory Questions about Catholicism Quotes of the Day Quoting the News Race in America rants Recipes Remarried Catholics Reposts by request Retreat thoughts Rome Rudy Giuliani Russia Saints Sarah Palin Scandal Scott Brown SCOTUS Scriptural stuff Secularism Send in the clowns Serving up hot links Sexuality Sherrod Shroud of Turin Sisters and Nuns Social Entrepreneurship Social Media Social Security Socialism doesn't work Sports and Faith Stem Cells Strange Gods Suffering Synod Tea Parties Tea Party Terri Schiavo The 9/11 Commission The Catholic Answer The Constitution The Desert The Fourth Estate The Pelosi The Perpetual Adolescents The Rosary Third Party? Timothy Dolan Touch of evil TSA Tsunami TV/Pop Culture/Music TV/Pop Culture/Music Twitter Uncategorized Unemployment Unintended Consequences US Military Vaginal Musings Vatican Vespers video faves Vile Joe Biden Voter Fraud War by Litigation War on Terror War, What it good for? Why can't weeee be ... World Youth Days Year of Faith Year of the Priest

Select a Month August 2016 July 2016 April 2016 March 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does James say someone who doubts is like?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A house built on sand A wave of the sea, blown and tossed by the wind A leaf falling from a tree A sheep without a shepherd