Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

The Anchoress

Home
Catholic
Just how vehemently DID John Paul oppose the Iraq war?

Just how vehemently DID John Paul oppose the Iraq war?

Last updated on: March 13, 2015 at 8:47 pm by Elizabeth Scalia

Just how vehemently DID John Paul oppose the Iraq war? 2015-03-13T20:47:46+00:00 Elizabeth Scalia

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Are the media presenting this issue fairly or accurately?

It’s a good question. Last night we heard CNN’s Christiane Amanpour, among others, say approximately 7,392 times that Pope John Paul II “deeply opposed President Bush’s Iraq war…”

Sometimes we got the addendum, “…although he was supportive of Americas Just War in the Balkans, under President Clinton.”

I don’t know about that second part – this article seems to suggest otherwise.

Pope John Paul II, in the midst of a talk on the newly beatified Padre Pio, turned his thoughts to Kosovo. “I raise my voice again to implore, in the name of God,” said the Holy Father, “that this attack by man against man come to an end, that the instruments of destruction and death be stopped, that all channels of aid be activated to help those who are obliged to leave their land in the midst of unspeakable atrocities. That dialogue be renewed, with the intelligence and creativity that God has given man to resolve tensions and conflicts, to build a society based on the respect due to every human person.”

But staying focused on Iraq, just how “deeply” did JPII oppose the war? (And while we’re at it, just how “conservative” was he? As conservative as those pesky, never-silent cable-news channels suggest? :-)

There is an excellent commentary from America Magazine re the Legacy of JPII, which quite rightly declares that the man was owned neither by right nor left. You’ll want to read the whole thing, but here is an excerpt:

John Paul was often mislabeled as a conservative. True, he stressed traditional church teaching. He also allowed his subordinates to silence and remove theologians from teaching positions. But anyone who listened to him carefully realized that he did not fit into the normal liberal-conservative boxes of American politics and culture. True he opposed abortion, the use of condoms, gay marriage, women priests and a married clergy. But he was to the left of liberal Democrats when it came to opposing capital punishment and the war in Iraq and supporting foreign aid and the United Nations. And while he opposed women’s ordination, he also opened practically every other church position to women, from altar servers to diocesan chancellors.

John Paul will also be remembered for his incredibly successful pastoral visits to every corner of the world. People by the millions came out to pray with him and hear him preach. “What did they come out to see? A reed shaken by the wind?” They came to see a holy man, a man of conviction and principle, a man who cared about them and a man who had changed the course of history. In this day of world leaders who tell us what their handlers think we want to hear, who don’t open their mouths without checking the polls and focus groups, John Paul was clearly different. He spoke with conviction, he was principled, he challenged us and said hard things. Even those who disagreed with him admired his honesty and conviction. He will be sorely missed; he will be a hard act to follow. May he rest in Peace.

That’s awfully good. My one question is whether or not America is right in asserting with such certainty that the Pope did, in fact, oppose the Iraq war.

As near as I can find, and I have only looked for a short time, while members of the Vatican – who are (let us be clear) NOT the pope – did make very public negative remarks about the war and even about the capture of Saddam Hussein, the pope himself said very little in public, making only one remark which could be arguably be called an outright complaint:

“When war, as in these days in Iraq, threatens the fate of humanity, it is ever more urgent to proclaim, with a strong and decisive voice, that only peace is the road to follow to construct a more just and united society,” John Paul said. “Violence and arms can never resolve the problems of man.”

John Paul II “implored for the world’s deliverance from the peril of the tragic clash between cultures and religions.” The Pope also sent his message to terrorists: “Let there be an end to the chain of hatred and terrorism which threatens the orderly development of the human family.”

My source here is The Catholic Worker, so it’s pretty heavily left-centered; it is a frequent critic of JPII for what they take to be his inflexible conservatism on matters birth-control, women’s rights, etc, but when he suits their politics, they don’t mind holding him up! (I am certain they would say the same about folks like me who appreciate the pope’s stance on those issues…) But in reading these responses one sees that JPII could just as easily be talking of all war, using “Iraq” as an example.

The pope would have been derelict in his duties, I think, had he NOT preferred and recommended peace over war. Contrary to the charges of some, no one likes war or wants it; some simply see it as necessary where others do not and – given the intelligence available – intelligence which even Bill and Hillary Clinton and Al Gore have stated they emphatically believed, this war was thought to be necessary.

The Worker, frustrated in not finding more anti-war quotes from the pope, makes the rather stunning charge that the media were somehow not publishing the pope’s emphatic opposition – seemingly because the press…supported Bush…or something. For those of us who have observed the international media’s relentless anti-war coverage, that is a little strange to read, and difficult to accept. While this particular article suggests that JPII’s message to President Bush was “God is not on your side if you invade Iraq,” the fact is, we have no record of those words coming from the pope’s mouth.

We do, however, see the fruits of the Iraq war: people voting for a democratic government, other countries – having witnessed that vote – fighting to obtain their freedom. We don’t know how all of that will end, yet – there are long, long rows to hoe before what has been begun in that region can be defined as successful or unsuccessful, but one may consider (or presume) that perhaps JPII saw all of that and remembered the words, “by their fruits you shall know them…”

National Review Online’s weblog, The Corner had a lengthy debate on this issue some time ago, and it is worth reading. Some excerpts:

RE: THE PONTIFF AND THE WAR [Peter Robinson]
Recap: In an article about Italy last week, Ian Fisher of the New York Times claimed the Pope has displayed “outspoken opposition to the war in Iraq.” I asked if readers of this happy Corner could provide me with as much as a single instance in which the Pontiff has denounced the war. Sean Gleeson linked to my post, issuing the same challenge to readers of his website.

Results: One reader–count ‘em, one–met the challe
nge, referring Sean and me to a piece that William McGurn published in the Wall Street Journal on March 14, 2003: “If there were any doubts left about where Pope John Paul II stands on war with Iraq, they ought to have been answered by his characterization of any military effort against Saddam as a ‘crime against humanity.’”

Before Sean and I award this reader the Sean Gleeson Researcher of the Century Award, however, we note one problem. The Pope never said any such thing.

“I got the quote from the Telegraph [a British newspaper],” Bill McGurn told me when I called him, “and as soon as my piece came out Father Neuhaus [editor of First Things] got in touch to tell me it was wrong. I asked the guys at the Telegraph. They admitted they’d gotten it wrong. They were garbling a different statement.”

On March 28, 2003, Bill published a correction, combining it with a pointed meditation on the Pope and just war doctrine.

Which takes Sean and me back where we started. The New York Times may have convinced itself that John Paul II is “outspoken [in] opposition to the war in Iraq,” but neither that newspaper’s fine reporters nor anyone else can quote the Pontiff condemning the war, because no such quotation exists.

NRO appears to be correct, that no such direct condemnation exists.

I expect this question will be debated at length, and by much better minds than mine, and that is perhaps a good and necessary back-and-forth to have. But it would be nice if, while the question is so clearly under debate, the folks as the various news and cable outlets and papers would perhaps refrain from repeating – ad nauseum – “the pope deeply opposed the war in Iraq.” Christiane Amanpour, Chris Matthews…yeah, I’m talking to you! :-)

John Paul II

The Fourth Estate

War, What it good for?

Previous Post

April 2, 2005

JPII on Christ's love - Youth Day, 2000

Next Post

April 3, 2005 A personal resolve to try to be more balanced

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category "Remaking" Ourselves 'Remaking' America 9/10 Mindset 9/11 trials Abortion ACORN Adoration Advent Advent 2008 Advent 2009 Advent 2010 Alternative Energy Alternative Media America American Catholic Church American Church American Genius Ameridolatry ANCHORESS BOOKSHELF Anglican-Roman Reconciliation Answers & Questions Anti_Semitism Archbishop Hilarion Ayn Rand Bad Mass Barack Obama Baseball Benedict Benedict & Islam Benedict in UK Benedict XVI Benedictine Bill Whittle Birth Control Blogs and Blogging Blogs and Blogging Bloodless Coup Bobby Jindal Bookchat Breitbart Bride at every wedding... Bride at every wedding... Buckley Bullies Bush Bad? Bush Good Buster Capitalism Catholic Fiction Catholic Vocations Catholicism Celibacy Chaput Charitable Stuff Chesterton Chile Chris Christie Christians in Exile Christine O' Donnell Christmas Christmas Gift Ideas Church Hates Science? Church hates women Communion of Saints Compline Conclave 2013 Confession Constitutional Stuff Conversion Crisis & Opportunity Critical Thinking Crooks and Liars Crucible of Faith Cuba Culture of Life Culture of Life/Death Culture of Treason? Dancing Death Dialogue re Islam Dick Meyer Divorce and Remarriage DOJ Domestic Terrorism Dominican Order Don't try me too high Dowd Dumb Democrat moves Dumb GOP moves Economic woe Education Egregious Harry Reid Elder Son Elder Son's Sweet Girlfriend Elderly Election '10 Election '12 Election '16 Election 2004 Election 2006 Election 2008 Election 2010 Election 2016 Elena Kagan Elitism Embryonic Stem Cell Research End Times? English language Enhanced Interrogation Erosion of Rights Eucharist Euthanasia Exorcism Extraordinary Synod Facebook Faith Faith and Reason Faith Friday Faith Perspective Faithful Friday Fascism Again Fascism in America Fatima FCC Feminism Film First Things Forgiveness Fr. James Martin Francis and Islam Francis in America Frassati Fred Thompson Free Speech? Freedom of Worship FutureChurch Global Pandemic GOP Congress Haiti Head Covering Health Care Here and Queer Hermits Heroes Hitchens Holy Spirit Holy Week '09 Holy Week '10 Hoo-Hah & BS Hoo-Hah & BS Icons Illegal Immigration In The Arena Interviews Interwebz Iran Uprising Iraqi Christians ISIL ISIS Islamic State Islamification/Islamofascism Islamification/Islamofascism Isra-El It's all about me! Me! ME! James Burke Jerry Lewis Jesus Christ Joblessness John Boehner John McCain John Paul II John XXIII Juan Williams Just Words Katrina/Rita King is a Fink Latin Mass Leadership Lectio Divina Lent Lent '08 Lent '09 Lent 2010 Lent 2011 Limbaugh Listen to Lizzie Litigious Society Liturgy Liturgy of the Hours Mainstream Media Manliness Marriage Mary Media Excess Medical Merton Michelle Obama Mighty John O' Connor Misc. Miss Ella Missionaries Mitt Romney Monasticism My brother S My Irish Aunties Mystic Monks Nanny Statism Nature NEA Neri New Media Newman Noonan Notre Dame NPR Stuff Nun News Obama Bad? Obama Good? Obama White House Oil Spill Online Retreat '08 Online Retreat Days Oratory Orthodoxy Our Hillary! Parenting Passionists Patheos Patheos Book Club Patrons Paul Ryan Penance Penn Jillette Philosophy PJTV Podcasts Poetry Politics-free zone Pop Culture Pope Emeritus Pope Francis Prayer Predictions Priesthood Pro-Life Public Sector Unions Purgatory Questions about Catholicism Quotes of the Day Quoting the News Race in America rants Recipes Remarried Catholics Reposts by request Retreat thoughts Rome Rudy Giuliani Russia Saints Sarah Palin Scandal Scott Brown SCOTUS Scriptural stuff Secularism Send in the clowns Serving up hot links Sexuality Sherrod Shroud of Turin Sisters and Nuns Social Entrepreneurship Social Media Social Security Socialism doesn't work Sports and Faith Stem Cells Strange Gods Suffering Synod Tea Parties Tea Party Terri Schiavo The 9/11 Commission The Catholic Answer The Constitution The Desert The Fourth Estate The Pelosi The Perpetual Adolescents The Rosary Third Party? Timothy Dolan Touch of evil TSA Tsunami TV/Pop Culture/Music TV/Pop Culture/Music Twitter Uncategorized Unemployment Unintended Consequences US Military Vaginal Musings Vatican Vespers video faves Vile Joe Biden Voter Fraud War by Litigation War on Terror War, What it good for? Why can't weeee be ... World Youth Days Year of Faith Year of the Priest

Select a Month August 2016 July 2016 April 2016 March 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which book of the Bible has a talking tree?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Genesis Proverbs Ezekiel Judges