Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Pagan
Slagging Down The Moon

Slagging Down The Moon

Last updated on: July 10, 2017 at 3:48 am by Laura Tempest Zakroff

Slagging Down The Moon 2017-07-10T03:48:30-08:00 Laura Tempest Zakroff

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The question I’ve gotten most often on The Witch’s Cauldron book tour surprisingly doesn’t have anything to do with cauldrons. It’s “What is it like working with Llewellyn?”

The easiest answer is, “Well, I’ve contracted for my third book with them, so obviously I’m pretty happy about working with them.”

But there’s more to it than that. And considering the load of tired, out-dated rumor-mongering I saw on a recent thread where a friend asked if they should consider sending a manuscript to Llewellyn, I’d like to talk about it. Because people talking bullshit is a pet peeve of mine.

I can’t speak for everyone’s experience, but I can certainly speak from mine.

"I Bring The Moon In Hand" art by the author

“I Bring The Moon In Hand” art by the author

I’m no stranger to P-word publishing. I was the associate editor of a Pagan publication for several years from the late 90’s to the early 00’s and part of that work included both receiving and soliciting books for reviews. We got books from a wide variety of publishers – small and large, as well as self-published works. I particularly remember receiving some work that was questionable in content and quality from Llewellyn in that time period. It was a boom time, and the boom time in any industry means there’s a pressure to release as much material as possible. It’s not a great recipe for generating quality content from the best qualified. But they certainly weren’t the only publisher turning out some less than stellar work. (I can think of quite a few publishers who put out books in that period they would rather forget.)

But I get it. I’m of the generation that did a fair amount of eye-rolling at certain titles and authors back then. There were a few titles in my personal library from Llewellyn, but they were in the minority. Then I stopped keeping track of publishing in general for about a decade as I stepped away from being actively involved in the community.

A decade later, I’m back at PantheaCon, and catching up on what I’ve missed. Titles and authors catching my eye in the vendor room, I was pleasantly surprised with what I was finding from books bearing little crescent moon on their spines. New names, works with historical focus, explorations of different traditions, bibliographies and good design. I attended some of the Llewellyn suite events and met the attending staff. I was intrigued and put them on my radar. This wasn’t the same old stuff from the 90’s.

Meanwhile, I was contemplating several projects for publishing (self-done or proposing to publishers), but those kept being put on the backburner. That’s when I saw the call-out for the The Witch’s Cauldron. I thought to myself – that’s a really neat series, and a good way to jump into the publishing pool, with the support of a major publisher no less. But I had my reservations – and several folks warning me to be careful, though with the added note that they hadn’t known anyone who had worked with Llewellyn in more recent years – so things could have changed. (Which shows their wisdom – they admitted they didn’t know if things were still the way they heard they were since they lacked personal or recent experience to reference.)

When I was awarded the contract, I had a professional who is well-versed in the publishing world look it over for me – and she found it to be quite standard for the industry, with just a few suggestions. And even though I’m not a lawyer, I knew contracts could be negotiated, so we were able to come to a contract everyone was happy with – and quite easily.

But I was still worried after turning in my first draft – how much would get cut out? Would it still be my voice? Would it get “dumbed down” (the common accusation I see tossed their way) or would the fun parts being taken out for being too witchy?

The answer: NOPE. Instead, the guidance I received encouraged me to dig deeper in some areas, to explain things in more detail. The editing focus was on clarity (because surprise! not everyone lives in my head), and making sure references had their sources properly cited. No content was cut out by my editors, my inherent SAT/AP Honors English vocabulary well-preserved. The editorial staff was very complementary of my work – and I have to say they were a pleasure to work with. They helped to push me in all the right ways to put out a work I am proud of. I really respect the folks I work with, and the process has definitely been an excellent experience.

photo - book cover How? Why? What changed? Well, companies change as the market shifts (print publishing has seen a LOT of changes in the last decade) – affecting staff, policies, and focus. My understanding is that Llewellyn in the last decade made some conscious and focused changes, and it shows.

It’s not only been apparent to me, but to other friends whose opinions and work I value – Devin Hunter, Storm Faerywolf, Jason Mankey, John Beckett, among quite a few other folks I’ve had the pleasure of making the acquaintance of in recent years. It’s a different era. And none of these folks are pushovers when it comes to contracts or preserving their work and related content.

So authors are not being bullied into crap contracts. Content is not being “watered down” or made for the “lowest common denominator.” Not everything a publisher puts out will be for all audiences, but it would be silly to think otherwise.

So if you’ve read my book and you’ve had the reaction, “wow, this doesn’t seem like a Llewellyn book to me” – well, there’s more where that came from. Time to allow for change – and remember – don’t judge a book by its spine.

(Also to note, my publisher did not prompt me to write this post in any way. Random posts from people talking out their rears may have though. Rule #4 of Witchcraft: seek the truth.)

Previous Post

July 5, 2017

In Which I Survived the Elements

Next Post

July 8, 2017 I Didn't Find the Witch Life, the Witch Life Found me...

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Art Books cats cauldron month community contest Events home Metaphysics Modern Practice Movement Myth & Folklore satire sigils Tradition travel Uncategorized video

Select a Month May 2026 March 2026 January 2026 September 2025 August 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 August 2024 June 2024 May 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 February 2023 December 2022 November 2022 September 2022 July 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz