Hell: Tacit Knowledge and the Impossible Claims Some People Make

Last updated on: October 30, 2015 at 11:51 am by Guest Contributor

Hell: Tacit Knowledge and the Impossible Claims Some People Make 2015-10-30T11:51:45-05:00 Guest Contributor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This is a guest post by Matthew Distefano, whose book “All Set Free: How God is Revealed in Jesus and Why That is Really Good News” was recently published by Wipf and Stock. Read more of Matthew’s excellent work at his website All Set Free and at the Raven Foundation.

Tacit knowledge is the sort of knowledge that is experienced. It is difficult, if not impossible, to use language to explain it. An example should make this clear so let me offer one.

If I wanted to prove that I knew how to ride a bicycle, what proof would I offer? Would I state something like, “When analyzing bicycle stability it is common to use two parameters; the lean angle and steering angle of the bike” or, rather, simply model that I have experienced riding a bike? I believe the answer is self-evident.

If I merely explained the physics of how to ride a bike to somebody, I would not have transferred any knowledge to the person. They would have to get on a bike, find the balance point, learn how to pedal, and experience all the ins and outs that go into actually riding the bike. Then they would tacitly know how to ride a bike, which of course, is the only way to know how to ride a bike. The same thing goes for love and since God is love I think you see where I will be going with this.

Hopefully all of us have experienced love in one way or another. If we have, then we all have knowledge that cannot be put into words. Transferring the knowledge of what it felt like to hold my daughter, Elyse, for the first time, will never be accomplished. Yet, for those who have held their own newborn child, we all just sort of know what we are trying to talk about when we talk about the experience. The same thing can be said about the love of God.

So, why then, do so many Christians make impossible claims about God, the nature of the supposed dualistic afterlife God has set up (assuming that there should be an afterlife at all), and how he relates to and with his son Jesus? For instance, how can we claim that God is love, which we’ve all experienced, and also that he is the creator of, let’s say, a place or state of everlasting torment, which based on our experience, cannot possibly be the product of love?

Think about it!

People can quote their favorite Bible verse all they want—and assuming their interpretation is the correct one—but having never experienced love in their own lives doing such a thing, this common Western eschatological view tacitly carries little weight. Should one of our loved ones behave in the same way many people claim God does, there is no doubt we would not consider that love. But somehow it is if God does it?

Now, if we choose to listen to what Scripture does say about the afterlife, we can certainly find a strong statement in Revelation 21:4, where John the Revelator envisions a time when God will “wipe every tear from their eyes.” How can any human being possibly say this unless there is hope that all will be reconciled in the end?

Again, think about it!

One can shout until they are blue in the face that God may make those in heaven ignorant to the existence of their lost loved ones or even sicker, that the torment of the damned—which inevitably includes those same loved ones—would be viewed as something to give glory to God for, but these claims again cannot be experienced. Thus, it would seem utterly irresponsible for John to tell us that someday, all of our pain, sorrow, grief, guilt, hurt, and torment would melt away unless he envisioned a time when all who ever existed would live in harmony with one another forever.

Certainly, should we actually believe that we will no longer see our sons and daughters, husbands and wives, brothers and sisters, fathers and mothers; we would live in a state of hopelessness and thus, lose our very humanity. I feel as if everyone, including John the Revelator, knows that in their “gut.” I feel this way because I have experienced such a strong love for my wife and daughter that I cannot believe I would ever be consoled should either one of them be lost from me forever. If they are someday lost—or if anyone is for that matter—I would have to include the Apostle Paul as being just as irresponsible as John when he mocks death itself in 1 Corinthians 15:55. Indeed, death stings like hell should the dualistic ending to the human story in fact be the correct one, as many Christians often unflinchingly claim it is.

Now, I would like to address one other claim that a large portion of these very same Christians make about God, which is that in order for the Father to forgive our sins, he had to have his son sacrificed first. I will be blunt: there cannot be a single Christian who has ever experienced a claim such as this. Again, interpreting Scripture is one thing, but without the possibility of tacitly knowing this supposed “truth,” how much attention should such a theory garner? I say: not much! As a father, to experience this would force me to become a monster. As a son, I would have to become a victim of my father’s insanity. Either way, to experience penal substitutionary atonement theory is to experience darkness but in God there is no darkness at all. Selah!

Drawing from my own tacit knowledge, I can honestly say that I have experienced God in multiple ways—both his wrath and his mercy. During my younger years, when I was more angry and resentful, I experienced God’s love as wrath. My view of God was through the lens of anger and hostility—wood, hay, and stubble as Paul would put it[1]—and the purifying flames of God’s love seared as if it were vengeance and wrath. However, when I began to consent to God’s love and when I began to follow the Way of Jesus, the Father’s steadfast love was now experienced as such. I was the one who changed, not God.

I believe that all who have experienced love have experienced the divine. That love is the grounding of our existence. It permeates the cosmos and self-evidently can only be known by experience. Once this is truly experienced, no darkness can overcome it (John 1:5). In the end, no darkness will. At least, that is the hope I have based on my experiences.

Let us at least have hope.

[1] 1 Corinthians 3:12.

Stay in the loop! Like Teaching Nonviolent Atonement on Facebook!

penal substitutionary atonement

revelation

Previous Post

October 29, 2015

Open Letter to President Obama: End the War in Afghanistan

Next Post

November 2, 2015 "The Soul of Shame" - Republicans and the CNBC Debate

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atonement and Current Events Curriculum Faith and Families Interviews Jesus the Forgiving Victim Lent Montessori politics Reviews The Bible Explained Uncategorized Valentine's Day Wednesday Sermon Who is God?

Select a Month July 2020 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 January 2014 December 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz